ANALYSIS OF FOREIGN EXPERIENCE OF THE METHODOLOGY OF ASSESSING INNOVATION PROJECTS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32689/2523-4536/76-3Keywords:
innovations, socio-economic development, innovation project, economy, state, scientific institutions, ranking, innovation potentialAbstract
Innovative development of the country's potential based on digital transformation is an urgent task for any competitive economic policy. It is able to ensure the implementation of an innovative strategy and the digital transformation of the state. In connection with the high speed of development and renewal of the economic market, the problem is the lack of methods for the rational selection of innovative projects. In practice, scientific institutions and companies often implement innovative projects without reasonable selection and ranking, which in turn leads to a high proportion of unsuccessful innovative projects and final results, implementations. As a result of implementation, the institution and the state as a whole do not receive a commercially successful product or service that is distinguished by the consumer among competitors. The evaluation of innovative projects is based on the analysis of financial indicators of the expected results from implementation, implementation. The evaluation of the strategic coherence of the innovative project is ignored. The purpose of the study was to analyze approaches to the methodology of ranking innovative projects. The method used is a comprehensive analysis of the impact of the proposed project results on various aspects of the companies' activities (strategic, environmental, organizational and technological). The study highlighted the features of innovative projects in the field of new technologies, carried out a comparative analysis of methodological approaches to the evaluation of innovative projects, modified the model of adopting innovations and their implementation. The authors analyzed the foreign experience of applying the methodology of evaluating innovative projects, their features and implementation. Ensuring the sustainable development of the economy largely depends on the implementation of the innovation model, in which the innovation infrastructure plays a key role. The search for appropriate methods and approaches to project assessment determined the relevance of the research topic. The article summarizes the methods of evaluation of innovative projects, identifies their advantages and disadvantages. In addition, the peculiarities of the assessment of innovative projects are revealed. The novelty of the work is the improvement of the methodical approach and model for evaluating the efficiency of innovative projects, which takes into account the specifics of the investment, technological process and project implementation. The application of the proposed methodical approach to the evaluation of innovative projects, in turn, will make it possible to speed up the process of selecting innovative projects and their implementation, will contribute to the activation of innovative activities and the formation of a sustainable innovation culture of Ukraine, which will contribute to the sustainable development of the country.
References
Антонюк Л., Поручник А., Савчук В. Інновації: теорія, механізм розробки та комерціалізації. Київ : КНЕУ, 2003. 394 с.
Вергун В. А. Інформаційно-технологічний вимір міжнародної конкурентоспроможності України. Актуальні проблеми міжнародних відносин. 2011. Вип. 102. Ч. 1. С. 29–33.
Геєць В. М., Семиноженко В. П. Інноваційні перспективи України : монографія. Харків : Константа, 2006. 272 с.
Довгаль О. А., Довгаль Г. В. Глобальний інноваційний простір: передумови, специфіка й інструменти формування. Проблеми економіки. 2017. № 1. С. 15–20.
Мартюшева Л., Калишенко В. Інноваційний потенціал підприємства як об’єкт економічного дослідження. Фінанси України. 2002. № 10. С. 61–66.
Mumford M. D., Bedell-Avers K. E., Hunter S. T. Planning for innovation: A multi-level perspective. Multi-Level Issues in Creativity and Innovation. 2007. Vol. 7. Pp. 107–154.
Rogers E. M. Diffusion of innovations. USA : Free Press, 2010. 518 p.
Bikse V., Lusena-Ezera I., Rivza B. Innovative startups: challenges and development opportunities in Latvia. Int. J. Innov. Sci. 2018. Vol. 10. Pp. 261–273.
Linton J., Walsh S., Morabito J. Analysis, ranking and selection of R&D projects in a portfolio. R& D Management. 2000. Vol. 32 (2). Pp. 139–148.
Старигін Д. О., Гук О. В. Оцінка ефективності інноваційних проєктів: сутність та шляхи вдосконалення. Modern Economics. 2020. Вип. 23. С. 204–210.
Miorando R., Ribeiro J., Cortimiglia M. An economic-probabilistic model for risk analysis in technological innovation projects. J. Technovation. 2014. Vol. 8. Pp. 485–498.
Тебенко В. М. Економіка та організація інноваційної діяльності : Електронний навчальний посібник. 2-е вид., 2018. URL: https://elib.tsatu.edu.ua/dep/feb/ptbd_1/page34.html
Янковець Т. М. Управління інноваційними проєктами і програмами для забезпечення економічної безпеки підприємств. Проблеми науки. 2014. № 2. С. 26–31.
Katić A., Ćosić I., Kupusinac A., Vasiljević M., Stojić I. Knowledge-based competitiveness indices and its connection with energy indices. Thermal Science. 2016. Vol. 20, pp. 451–461.
Bezuhla, L., Kinash, I., Andrusiv, U., Dovgal, O. Attracting Foreign Direct Investment as an Economic Challenge for Ukraine in the Context of Globalization. Моделювання, розвиток та стратегічне управління економічними системами : матеріали VII Міжнародної науково-практичної конференції; Івано-Франківський національний технічний університет нафти і газу (м. Буковель, 24-25 жовтня 2019). Буковель. С. 195–200.
Marlen A. Fostering sustainability by linking cocreation and relationship management concepts. J. Clean. Prod. 2017. Vol. 140. Pp. 179–188.
Schamberger D., Cleven N. Performance Effects of Exploratory and Exploitative Innovation Strategies and the Moderating Role of External Innovation Partners. Ind. Innovat. 2013. Vol. 20. Pp. 336–356.
Rauter R., Globocnik D., Perl-Vorbach E., Baumgartner R. Open innovation and its effects on economic and sustainability innovation performance. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge. 2019. Vol. 4(4). Pp. 226–233.
OECD Oslo Manual. Paris : OECD, 2005. 203 p.
Фатхутдінов Р. А. Інноваційний менеджмент : підручник. Миколаїв : ЗАТ «Бізнес-школа», 2006. 256 с.
Grover V., Teng J., Fiedler K. Empirical Evidence on Swanson's Tri-Core Model of Information Systems Innovation. Information Systems Research. 1997. Vol. 8, 3. pp. 273–287.
Swanson E. B., Ramiller N. C. The Organizing Vision in Information Systems Innovation. Organization Science. 1997. Vol. 8. Pp. 458–474.
One-Ki Lee, Mo Wang, Kai H. Lim, Zeyu Peng Knowledge management systems diffusion in chinese enterprises : A multistage approach using the technology-organization-environment framework. Journal of Global Information Management. 2009. Vol. 17, № 1. Рp. 70–84.
Stevens S. S. On the theory of scales of measurement. Science. 1946. Vol. 103. Pp. 677–680.
Ajzen I. Organizational behavior and human decision processes. The theory of planned behavior. 1991. Vol. 50, № 2. Pp. 179–211.
Kuan K., Chau P. A perception-based model for EDI adoption in small businesses using a technology-organization-environment framework. Information & Management. 2001. Vol. 38 (8). Pp. 507–521.
Tornatzky L., Fleischer M., Chakrabarti A. Processes of technological innovation. Publisher: Lexington Books, 1990. 298 p.
Pan M. J., Jang W. Y. Determinants of the Adoption of Enterprise Resource Planning within the Technology-Organization-Environment Framework: Taiwan’s Communications Industry. Journal of Computer Information Systems. 2008. Vol. 48. Pp. 94–102.
Antonyuk, L., Poruchnyk, A., Savchuk, V. (2003). Innovatsiyi: teoriya, mekhanizm rozrobky ta komertsializatsiyi [Innovations: theory, mechanism of development and commercialization]. Kyiv : KNEU, 394. (in Ukrainian)
Vergun, V. A. (2011). Informatsiyno-tekhnolohichnyy vymir mizhnarodnoyi konkurentospromozhnosti Ukrayiny [Information and technological dimension of international competitiveness of Ukraine]. Actual problems of international relations, 102, 1, 29–33. (in Ukrainian)
Geets, V. M., Seminozhenko, V. P. (2006). Innovatsiyni perspektyvy Ukrayiny [Innovative prospects of Ukraine]. Kharkiv : Constanta, 272. (in Ukrainian)
Dovgal, O. A., Dovgal, G. V. (2017). Hlobalʹnyy innovatsiynyy prostir: peredumovy, spetsyfika y instrumenty formuvannya [Global innovation space: prerequisites, specifics and tools of formation]. Problems of the economy, 1, 15–20. (in Ukrainian)
Martyusheva, L., Kalyshenko, V. (2002). Innovatsiynyy potentsial pidpryyemstva yak obyekt ekonomichnoho doslidzhennya [Innovative potential of the enterprise as an object of economic research]. Finances of Ukraine, 10, 61–66. (in Ukrainian)
Mumford, M., Bedell-Avers, K., Hunter, S. (2007). Multi-level issues in creativity and innovation, Planning for innovation: A multi-level perspective. Multi-Level Issues in Creativity and Innovation, 7, 107–154.
Rogers, E. M. (2010). Diffusion of innovations. USA : Free Press, 518.
Bikse, V., Lusena-Ezera, I., Rivza, B. (2018). Innovative startups: challenges and development opportunities in Latvia. Int. J. Innov. Sci., 10, 261–273.
Linton, J., Walsh, S., Morabito, J. (2000). Analysis, ranking and selection of R&D projects in a portfolio. R& D Management, 32 (2), 139–148.
Starygin, D. O., Huk, O. V. (2020). Otsinka efektyvnosti innovatsiynykh proyektiv: sutnistʹ ta shlyakhy vdoskonalennya [Evaluation of the effectiveness of innovative projects: essence and ways of improvement]. Modern Economics, 23, 204–210. (in Ukrainian)
Miorando, R., Ribeiro, J., Cortimiglia, M. (2014). An economic-probabilistic model for risk analysis in technological innovation projects. J. Technovation, 8, 485–498.
Tebenko, V. M. (2018). Ekonomika ta orhanizatsiya innovatsiynoyi diyalʹnosti [Economics and organization of innovative activity]. Available at: https://elib.tsatu.edu.ua/dep/feb/ptbd_1/page34.html (in Ukrainian)
Yankovets, T. M. (2014). Upravlinnya innovatsiynymy proyektamy i prohramamy dlya zabezpechennya ekonomichnoyi bezpeky pidpryyemstv [Management of innovative projects and programs to ensure the economic security of enterprises]. Problems of science, 2, 26–31. (in Ukrainian)
Katić, A., Ćosić, I., Kupusinac, A., Vasiljević, M., Stojić, I. (2016). Knowledge-based competitiveness indices and its connection with energy indices. Thermal Science, 20, 451–461.
Bezuhla, L., Kinash, I., Andrusiv, U., Dovgal, O. (2019). Attracting Foreign Direct Investment as an Economic Challenge for Ukraine in the Context of Globalization. Paper presented at the 7th International Conference on Modeling, Development and Strategic Management of Economic System; Ivano-Frankivsk National Technical University of oil and gas, TC Bukovel, 24-25 October 2019. 195–200.
Marlen, A. (2017). Fostering sustainability by linking cocreation and relationship management concepts. J. Clean. Prod, 140, 179–188.
Schamberger, D., Cleven, N. (2013). Performance Effects of Exploratory and Exploitative Innovation Strategies and the Moderating Role of External Innovation Partners. Ind. Innovat, 20, 336–356.
Rauter, R., Globocnik, D., Perl-Vorbach, E., Baumgartner, R. (2019). Open innovation and its effects on economic and sustainability innovation performance. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 4(4), 226–233.
OECD Oslo Manual. (2005). Paris : OECD. 203.
Fathutdinov, R. A. (2006). Innovatsiynyy menedzhment: pidruchnyk [Innovative management: a textbook]. Mykolaiv : CJSC "Business School", 256. (in Ukrainian)
Grover, V., Fiedler, K., Teng, J. (1997). Information systems research, Empirical evidence on Swanson's tri-core model of information systems innovation. Information Systems Research, 8, 3, 273–287.
Swanson, E. B., Ramiller, N. C. (1997). The Organizing Vision in Information Systems Innovstion. Organization Science, 8, 458–474.
Lee, O., Wang, M. (2009). Knowledge management systems diffusion in chinese enterprises : A multistage approach using the technology-organization-environment framework. Journal of Global Information Management, 17, 1, 70–84.
Stevens, S. S. (1946). On the theory of scales of measurement. Science, 103, 677–680.
Ajzen, I. (1991). Organizational behavior and human decision processes. The theory of planned behavior, 50, 2, 179–211.
Kuan, K., Chau, P. (2001). A perception-based model for EDI adoption in small businesses using a technology-organization-environment framework. Information & Management, 38 (8), 507–521.
Tornatzky, L., Fleischer, M., Chakrabarti, A. Processes of technological innovation. Publisher: Lexington Books, 298.
Pan, M. J., Jang, W. Y. (2008). Determinants of the Adoption of Enterprise Resource Planning within the Technology-Organization-Environment Framework: Taiwan’s Communications Industry. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 48, 94–102.
