SCALABILITY AND ANTIFRAGILITY OF THE REPORTING SYSTEM AS A KEY TO ORGANIZATIONAL SUSTAINABILITY

Authors

  • Sviatoslav Biloblovskyi Educational and Scientific Institute of Management, Economics and Business, Private Joint-Stock Company "Higher Education Institution Interregional Academy of Personnel Management" https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1635-8093

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32689/2523-4536/71-12

Keywords:

scalability, antifragile, management, integrated reporting, sustainable reporting, reporting system, data management system, IFRS

Abstract

The article examines the regulatory requirements that cannot be ignored, and subsequent mitigation measures organisations could take. The regulatory requirements regarding the reporting that organisations must follow have recently increased significantly - in addition to the already familiar and widely used financial statements and financial reporting (in particular, International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) or financial reporting standards based on similar conceptual reporting frameworks (US GAAP), such concepts as sustainability reporting and integrated reporting have been introduced. The challenge is that even an incorrect interpretation or incomplete compliance with regulatory requirements may lead to negative consequences for organisations, which may be multilayered - from direct monetary sanctions in the form of fines to reputational consequences, which in some cases may even result in threats to the business continuity (going concern). Global challenges for society impose new, rather stringent requirements on specific organisations. The practice shows that significant identified cases of regulation breaches or fraud lead to a straightforward response from national regulators, professional communities, and foundations. Such reactions are often expressed in creating and implementing new, usually quite strict and rigid rules and requirements related to reporting and the functioning of corporate governance and reporting systems. Based on the discussion above, it is clear that the environment in which organisations operate has a corresponding impact on the policies and procedures that should be applied in reporting. If an organisation operates on a multinational or global basis, it faces the challenge of considering detailed rules and broad principles. In order to minimise the impact of cultural sensitivities on an internal reporting system, organisations need to consider cultural differences when designing and implementing such a system. A critical issue for organisations is how quickly and efficiently they can adapt their internal processes and data management systems to new or enhanced rules and regulations. The complexity of the issue often lies in the fact that the world is moving towards total digitalisation, and a critical issue is how the system of processing and managing data, which is the basis for obtaining proper information, is built. Developing a scalable system is often the key to responding adequately to changes in the regulatory environment. An essential aspect of any system is its ability to withstand challenges, which is reflected in its robustness and reliability. Based on this, the author believes that for organisations that have identified compliance with the concept of sustainable development as one of their key goals, the necessity to build an integrated reporting system that considers the top-level concept of "antifragility" can be identified.

References

Безверхий К.В. Методичні засади формування інтегрованої звітності підприємства. Облік і фінанси. 2014. № 3(65). C. 8–14.

Голов С.Ф., Костюченко В.М., Кузіна Р.В. Інтегроване звітування: концепція, методологія та організація: монографія. Херсон : Видавничий дім «Гельветика», 2018. 252 с.

Корягін М.В., Куцик П.О. Проблеми та перспективи розвитку бухгалтерської звітності: монографія. Київ : Інтерсервіс, 2016. 276 с.

Roberts C., Weetman P., Gordon P. International corporate reporting: a comparative approach. 4th ed. Harlow, United Kingdom: FT Prentice Hall, 2008. 704 P.

David J. Cooper & Wayne Morgan. Meeting the evolving corporate reporting needs of government and society: arguments for a deliberative approach to accounting rule making, Accounting and Business Research. 2013. Vol. 43. No. 4. P. 418–441, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2013.794411 (дата звернення: 05.05.2023).

Bosi M.K., Lajuni N., Wellfren A.C., Lim T.S. Sustainability reporting through environmental, social, and governance: a bibliometric review. Sustainability. 2022. Vol. 14. No. 19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912071 (дата звернення: 05.05.2023).

Gond J.-P. Grubnic S., Herzig C., Moon J. Configuring Management Control Systems: Theorising the Integration of Strategy and Sustainability. Management Accounting Research. 2012. Vol. 23. No. 3. P. 205–223. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2012.06.003 (дата звернення: 05.08.2023).

Elkington J. Accounting for the triple bottom line. Measuring Business Excellence. 1998. Vol. 2. No. 3. P. 18–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/eb025539 (дата звернення: 05.08.2023).

Herremans I.M., Nazari J.A. Sustainability Reporting Driving Forces and Management Control Systems. Journal of Management Accounting Research. 2016. Vol. 28. No. 2. P. 103–124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2308/jmar-51470 (дата звернення: 05.08.2023).

Said Hassan A. Corporate financial reporting complexity: recommendations for improvement. Review of Business. 2011. Vol. 31, No. 2, pp. 69. URL: https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A267204747/AONE?u=anon~95d7edde&sid=googleScholar&xid=75bbaa9d (дата звернення: 05.08.2023).

Our Purpose. URL: https://www.frc.org.uk/about-the-frc/our-purpose (дата звернення: 12.08.2023).

Our Goals. URL: https://www.sec.gov/our-goals (дата звернення: 12.08.2023).

Положення про Міністерство фінансів України. Постанова Кабінету Міністрів України від 20.08.2014 № 375. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/375-2014-%D0%BF#Text (дата звернення: 16.08.2023).

Про Національний банк України: Закон України від 1999 № 29. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/679-14#Text (дата звернення: 20.08.2023).

The Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales. Fraudulent financial reporting: fresh thinking. URL: https://www.icaew.com/-/media/corporate/files/technical/audit-and-assurance/the-future-of-audit/fraudulent-financial-reporting-fresh-thinking.ashx (дата звернення: 29.07.2023).

Benston G., Bromwich M., Wagenhofer A. Principles -Versus Rules- Based Accounting Standards: the FASB’s Standard Setting Strategy. Abacus. 2006. Vol. 42. No. 2. Pp. 165–188.

McLean B. and Elkind P. The Smartest Guys in the Room. Penguin Books, 2004. 464 P.

Wagner S. and Dittmar L. The Unexpected Benefits of Sarbanes-Oxley. Harvard Business Review. 2006. Vol. 4. URL: https://hbr.org/2006/04/the-unexpected-benefits-of-sarbanes-oxley (дата звернення: 16.08.2023).

Skotarczyk Mitchell A. The Effect of Culture on the Implementation of International Financial Reporting Standards. 2011. 165 p. URL: https://scholarship.claremont.edu/cmc_theses/165 (дата звернення: 16.08.2023).

Wiener N. Cybernetics or Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press; Fourth printing, 1985. 212 p.

What Is Scalability? URL: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/what-scalability-bent-flyvbjerg-%E5%82%85%E4%BB%A5%E6%96%8C-/ (дата звернення: 19.08.2023).

Ansar A., Flyvbjerg B., Budzier A. and Lunn D. Big Is Fragile: An Attempt at Theorizing Scale. The Oxford Handbook of Megaproject Management. 2017. Chapter 4. P. 60–95.

Bondi A.B. Characteristics of scalability and their impact on performance. Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Software and Performance. 2000. P. 195–203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/350391.350432 (дата звернення: 20.08.2023).

Taleb Nassim N. Antifragile: Things That Gain From Disorder. New York: Random House Trade Paperbacks, 2014. 519 p.

Білобловський С.В. Розвиток концептуальних основ звітування – питання сталого розвитку або регуляторне зобов’язання. Наукові праці Міжрегіональної Академії управління персоналом. Економічні науки. 2023. № 2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32689/2523-4536/69-13

Bezverkhyi K. V. (2014) Metodychni zasady formuvannia intehrovanoi zvitnosti pidpryiemstva [Methodological principles of the formation of integrated reporting of the enterprise]. Accounting and finances, no. 3(65), pp. 8–14. (in Ukrainian)

Holov P. F., Kostiuchenko V. M., Kuzina R. V. (2018) Intehrovane zvituvannia: kontseptsiia, metodolohiia ta orhanizatsiia: Monohrafiia [Integrated reporting: concept, methodology and organization: Monograph]. Kherson: “Helvetica” Publishing House, 252 p. (in Ukrainian)

Koriahin M. V., Kutsyk P. O. (2016) Problemy ta perspektyvy rozvytku bukhhalterskoi zvitnosti: monohrafiia [Problems and prospects for the development of accounting reporting: monograph]. Kyiv: Interservice, 276 p. (in Ukrainian)

Roberts C., Weetman P., Gordon P. (2008) International corporate reporting: a comparative approach. 4th ed. Harlow, United Kingdom: FT Prentice Hall. 704 P.

David J. Cooper & Wayne Morgan (2013) Meeting the evolving corporate reporting needs of government and society: arguments for a deliberative approach to accounting rule making. Accounting and Business Research, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 418–441, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2013.794411 (accessed May 5, 2023).

Bosi M. K., Lajuni N., Wellfren A. C., Lim T. S. (2022) Sustainability reporting through environmental, social, and governance: a bibliometric review. Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912071 (accessed May 5, 2023).

Gond J.-P. Grubnic S., Herzig C., Moon J. (2012) Configuring Management Control Systems: Theorising the Integration of Strategy and Sustainability. Management Accounting Research, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 205–223. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2012.06.003 (accessed August 5, 2023).

Elkington J. (1998) Accounting for the triple bottom line. Measuring Business Excellence, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 18–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/eb025539 (accessed August 5, 2023).

Herremans I. M., Nazari J. A. (2016) Sustainability Reporting Driving Forces and Management Control Systems. Journal of Management Accounting Research, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 103–124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2308/jmar-51470 (accessed August 5, 2023).

Said Hassan A. (2016) Corporate financial reporting complexity: recommendations for improvement. Review of Business, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 69. Available at: https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A267204747/AONE?u=anon~95d7edde&sid=googleScholar&xid=75bbaa9d (accessed August 5, 2023).

Our Purpose. Available at: https://www.frc.org.uk/about-the-frc/our-purpose (accessed August 12, 2023).

Our Goals. Available at: https://www.sec.gov/our-goals (accessed August 12, 2023).

Polozhennja pro Ministerstvo finansiv Ukrajiny. Postanova Kabinetu Ministriv Ukrajiny [Regulation on The Ministry of Finance of Ukraine: Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine] 20.08.2014 No. 375. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/375-2014-%D0%BF#Text (accessed August 16, 2023).

Pro Nacionaljnyj bank Ukrajiny: Zakon Ukrainy [About the National Bank of Ukraine: Law of Ukraine] 1999 No. 29. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/679-14#Text (accessed August 20, 2023).

The Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales. Fraudulent financial reporting: fresh thinking. Available at: https://www.icaew.com/-/media/corporate/files/technical/audit-and-assurance/the-future-of-audit/fraudulent-financial-reporting-fresh-thinking.ashx (accessed July 29, 2023).

Benston G., Bromwich M., Wagenhofer A. (2006) Principles -Versus Rules- Based Accounting Standards: The FASB’s Standard Setting Strategy. Abacus, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 165–188.

McLean B. and Elkind P. (2004) The Smartest Guys in the Room. Penguin Books, 464 p.

Wagner S. and Dittmar L. (2006) The Unexpected Benefits of Sarbanes-Oxley. Harvard Business Review, vol. 4. Available at: https://hbr.org/2006/04/the-unexpected-benefits-of-sarbanes-oxley (accessed August 16, 2023).

Skotarczyk Mitchell A. (2011) The Effect of Culture on the Implementation of International Financial Reporting Standards. CMC Senior Theses. 165 p. Available at: https://scholarship.claremont.edu/cmc_theses/165 (accessed August 16, 2023).

Wiener N. (1985) Cybernetics or Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press; Fourth printing, 212 p.

What Is Scalability? Available at: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/what-scalability-bent-flyvbjerg-%E5%82%85%E4%BB%A5%E6%96%8C-/ (accessed August 19, 2023).

Ansar A., Flyvbjerg B., Budzier A. and Lunn D. n (2017) Big Is Fragile: An Attempt at Theorizing Scale. The Oxford Handbook of Megaproject Management, chapter 4, pp. 60–95.

Bondi A. B. (2000) Characteristics of scalability and their impact on performance. Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Software and Performance. pp. 195–203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/350391.350432 (accessed August 20, 2023).

Taleb Nassim N. (2014) Antifragile: Things That Gain From Disorder. New York: Random House Trade Paperbacks, 519 p.

Biloblovskyi S. V. (2023) Evolving of reporting frameworks - issue of sustainability or regulatory burden. Scientific Works of Interregional Academy of Personnel Management. Economic Sciences, no. 2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32689/2523-4536/69-13

Published

2023-10-20