ANALYSIS OF THE CHARACTERISTICS OF THE EVOLUTIONARY AND REVOLUTIONARY PATHS OF DEVELOPMENT OF THE STATE'S INNOVATIVE ECONOMY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32689/2523-4536/73-4Keywords:
innovation development, economic growth, evolutionary and revolutionary, innovation economy, globalization, technological revolutions, geopolitical changesAbstract
The article explores the concepts of “evolutionary innovation economy” and “revolutionary innovation economy” which define the distinctions between different innovation systems of countries. However these systems are interconnected ecologically, socially, and economically and constructed with logical and well-grounded natural ideas for innovative development at various levels. They are aimed at addressing the issues and tasks of Ukraine's science and technology policy. This is achieved by adhering to characteristics, principles, and the application of relevant instruments (methods, techniques, plans) that are structured and have both scientific and practical significance. A special concept for managing innovative development has been developed particularly in Ukraine. The purpose of this concept is to identify universally possible strategic vectors to form a vision of innovative development in a research mode and to determine the ways of organizing knowledge at various levels of management in the system of Ukraine's science and technology policy. The conceptualization of key aspects of innovation development management involves defining specific principles: orientation, clarity, systematization, optimality, heuristic, and significance. Contemporary approaches are proposed with the aim of effectively utilizing innovation development tools including the context of deepening integration processes in Ukraine too. This article provides an overview of the characteristics of evolutionary and revolutionary development of the state's innovation economy. Based on a review of the literature, data, and examples from various countries, the following key aspects are identified. The evolutionary path of innovation economy development is characterized by gradual changes, institutional stability, and moderate risk. This path can ensure stable economic growth and innovations based on the improvement of existing technologies and processes. The revolutionary path of innovation economy development involves radical changes, high risk, and uncertainty. It can lead to rapid economic growth and the creation of entirely new industries and technological paradigms. The choice between these paths depends on the specific goals, resources, and context of each country.
References
Національна стратегія розвитку сфери інтелектуальної власності в Україні на 2020−2025 роки: проект / керівник експертної групи д.ю.н. О.П. Орлюк. URL: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1oqjabxZiTempwJjaZsO1NoLt7fvP_qxj/view (дата звернення: 10.10.2023).
Ромер Пол М. Ендогенні технологічні зміни. Журнал політичної економії. Видавництво Чиказького університету. Том 98, № 5, Частина 2: Проблема розвитку: конференція Інституту вивчення систем вільного підприємництва (жовтень 1990 р.). С. 71–102. URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable /2937632
Агіон Ф., Ховітт П. Теорія ендогенного зростання. MIT Press, 1997. 710 с.
Solow R.M. A contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth // The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 156. February (vol. 70, № 1). P. 65–94.
Друкер Пітер Ф. Інновації та підприємництво. Практика та принципи інновацій та підприємництва. 1985. 346 с.
Scumpeter J. Business Cycles: A Theoretical, Historical and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process. N.Y.-L., 1939. 568 p.
Морозов О.Ф., Морозов Т.О. Інноваційна система України на 2000-2100 роки. Розширене відтворення інтелектуального капіталу як суть інноваційної моделі економіки України. Свідоцтво про реєстрацію авторського права №10213 від 07.06.04. Державний департамент інтелектуальної власності МОН України. Київ, 2004. 14 с.
Morozov O.F., Shevchenko M.M. Subject – Objekt Relations as “Whole General Effect” Management. Sci. & innov. 2020. V. 6. P. 28–35.
Морозов О.Ф. Щодо комплексифікації моделей соціально-економічних систем. Економіст. 2020. № 4. С.15–31.
Морозов О.Ф., Доля М.М., Мамчур Р.М. Біологізація процесів природокористування створення, переробки та споживання біоресурсів як запобіжний захист людства за умов наближення загроз світової технологічної сингулярності. Економіст. 2020. № 8. С. 6–23.
Морозов О.Ф. Потужність практичного розуму: у 2 ч. Ч. 1: Інноватика цілеспільних ефектів від єдності в свідомості уявного і дійсного: монографія. Київ : Міжрегіональна академія управління персоналом, 2023. 736 с.
National Strategy for the Development of Intellectual Property in Ukraine for 2020-2025: Project / Head of the Expert Group, Dr. O.P. Orliuk. Available at: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1oqjabxZiTempwJjaZsO1NoLt7fvP_qxj/view (Accessed on: October 10, 2023).
Romer, Paul M. Endogenous Technological Change. Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press. Vol. 98, No. 5, Part 2: The Problem of Development: The Conference of the Institute for the Study of Free Enterprise Systems (October 1990), pp. 71–102. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2937632
Aghion, Philippe, and Howitt, Peter. The Economics of Growth. MIT Press, 1997. 710 p.
Solow, Robert M. (1956) A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, February, Vol. 70, No. 1, pp. 65–94.
Drucker, Peter F. (1985) Innovation and Entrepreneurship: Practice and Principles of Innovation and Entrepreneurship. 346 p.
Schumpeter, Joseph (1939) Business Cycles: A Theoretical, Historical, and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process. New York-London.
Morozov A.F., Morozov T.A. (2004) Innovative System of Ukraine for the Years 2000-2100. Expanded Reproduction of Intellectual Capital as the Essence of Ukraine’s Innovation Model. Certificate of Copyright Registration No. 10213 dated June 7, 2004. State Department of Intellectual Property of the Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine. Kyiv, 14 p.
Morozov O.F., Shevchenko M.M. (2020) Subject – Object Relations as “Whole General Effect” Management. Sci. & innov. V. 6. P. 28–35.
Morozov O.F. (2020) On the complexification of models of socio-economic systems. Economist, no. 4, pp. 15–31.
Morozov O.F., Dolya M.M., Mamchur R.M. (2020) Biologization of processes of natural resource use, creation, processing, and consumption of bioresources as preventive protection of humanity in the face of approaching threats of global technological singularity. Economist, no. 8, pp. 6–23.
Morozov O.F. (2023) The power of practical reason: in 2 parts. Part 1: Innovation of comprehensive effects from the unity of consciousness of the imaginary and the real: monograph. Kyiv: Interregional Academy of Personnel Management. 736 p.
