THE EFFECTIVENESS OF USING A STABILIZING PLATFORM FOR REHABILITATION PURPOSES IN PATIENTS WITH INSTABILITY OF THE LUMBAR SPINE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32689/2663-0672-2023-2-5Keywords:
instability of the lumbar spine, rehabilitation, postural balance, stabilometry, balance test, stability platform, quality of life.Abstract
Abstract. Background. The problems of pathology of the musculoskeletal system in people are increasing from year to year. In connection with long-term sitting, the functioning of the musculoskeletal system is disturbed, which causes a violation of the ability to support and control the general center of mass of the body to maintain balance in static and dynamic positions. Aim. The aim of the study was to find out the effectiveness of using a stabilizing platform in people with instability of the lumbar spine. Materials and methods: the studies were performed on a stable platform with biofeedback TYMO (Tyromotion). 29 healthy people aged 18–25 years and 29 patients with instability of the cervical spine participated in the study. The patients underwent a 10-day rehabilitation course using a stability platform and stabilometry analysis before rehabilitation, immediately and 1 month after the course. Psychological testing was also conducted during these terms. Conclusions. With the help of the stabilometry method, it is possible to detect the dysfunction of the musculoskeletal system in time and carry out its correction. The use of a stabilizing platform makes it possible to effectively treat patients with instability of the lumbar spine and significantly improve their postural balance and quality of life.
References
McCriskin B.J., Cameron K.L., Orr J.D., Waterman B.R. Management and prevention of acute and chronic lateral ankle instability in athletic patient populations. World Journal Orthopedics. 2015. Vol. 6. № 2. P. 161–171. DOI: 10.5312/wjo.v6.i2.161.
Nitayarak H., Charntaraviroj P. Effects of scapular stabilization exercises on posture and muscle imbalances in women with upper crossed syndrome: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation. 2021. Vol. 34. № 6. P. 1031–1040. DOI: 10.3233/BMR-200088.
Azevedo R., Teixeira N., Abade E., Carvalho A. Effects of noise on postural stability when in the standing position. Work. 2016. Vol. 54. № 1. P. 87–91. DOI: 10.3233/WOR-162280.
Postural control and balance in a cohort of healthy people living in Europe: an observational study / Patti A. et al. // Medicine. 2018;97(52):e13835. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000013835.
Scoppa F., Capra R., Gallamini M., Shier R. Clinical stabilometry standardization: Basic definitions–acquisition interval– sampling frequency. Gait & Posture. 2013. Vol. 37. P. 290–292. DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.07.009.
Surgent O.J., Dadalko O.I., Pickett K.A., Travers B.G. Balance and the brain: a review of structural brain correlates of postural balance and balance training in humans. Gait & posture. 2019. Vol. 71. P. 245–252.
Porto C., Lemos T., Ferreira A.S. Analysis of the postural stabilization in the upright stance using optimization properties. Biomedical Signal Processing Control. 2019. Vol. 52. P. 171–178. DOI: 10.1016/j.bspc.2019.04.009
Feldman A.G. The Relationship Between Postural and Movement Stability. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology. 2016. Vol. 957. P. 105–120. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-47313-0_6.
Balance study in asymptomatic subjects: Determination of significant variables and reference patterns to improve clinical application / De la Torre J. et al. // Journal of Biomechanics. 2017. Vol. 65. P. 161–168. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2017.10.013.
A new methodology based on functional principal component analysis to study postural stability post-stroke / Sánchez- Sánchez M.L. et al. // Clinical Biomechanics. 2018. Vol. 56. P. 18–26. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2018.05.003.
Japanese standard for clinical stabilometry assessment: Current status and future directions / Yamamoto M. et al. // Auris Nasus Larynx. 2018. Vol. 45. № 2. P. 201–206. DOI: 10.1016/j.anl.2017.06.006
Standing balance post to talk neearthroplasty: sensitivity to change analysis from four to twelve weeks in 466 patients / Clark R.A. et al. // Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2017. Vol. 25. P. 42–45. DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2016.08.009
