THE LABORATORY STUDY ADHESIVE BOND STRENGTH OF PHOTOCOMPOSITION MATERIAL WITH TOOTH ENAMEL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32689/2663-0672-2023-5-17Keywords:
tooth restoration, enamel, acid resistance, etching, photocomposite, adhesive bond, strength.Abstract
Abstract. Formulation of the problem. The structural and functional teeth enamel acid resistance with a viable pulp can in a certain way influence the depth of acid microdefects in the enamel after its etching during the adhesive preparation of hard tissues for restoration and the strength of the adhesive bond of photocomposites with the enamel of teeth restored. The aim. Laboratory assessment of the adhesive strength of the photocomposition material with tooth enamel, depending on the initial structural and functional enamel acid resistance and the time of its etching. Materials and methods. The study was conducted on 80 samples made from extracted chewing teeth with a preliminary determination of structural and functional tooth enamel acid resistant in patients, depending on the level of which they were divided into four groups. Enamel etching was performed for 15 and 30 seconds in tooth samples of patients of groups I and II with high and medium levels, and for 15 and 30 seconds in tooth samples of patients of groups III and IV with low and very low levels. The strength of the adhesive bond between the photocomposite and the enamel was investigated for separation and shear. Results. In the samples of the people teeth of the I group, the indicators of the strength of the adhesive bond for separation and shear were 28.82±0.97 and 19.72±1.19 MPa, in the samples of the patients teeth of the II group, the indicators were equal to 34.90±1.81 and 23.90±2.06 MPa, III groups – 25.11±1.27 and 16.33±1.30 MPa, IV groups – 20.80±1.67 and 14.90±1.19 MPa, respectively. Indicators of the strength of the adhesive bond in the samples of the teeth of individuals of the II group were always probably (p<0.05) higher than other corresponding values. Conclusions. The results of the study demonstrated the need to extend the period of acid exposure to enamel to 30 seconds during adhesive preparation for direct teeth restoration of patients with a high or medium level of structural and functional enamel acid resistance, while in patients with low or very low acid resistance, increasing the etching time is impractical.
References
Водоріз Я. Ю. Фізичні властивості реставраційних матеріалів при різній глибині препарування твердих тканин
зубів. Вісник проблем біології і медицини. 2018. Вип. 4. Том 1 (146). С. 186–188.
Клітинська О. В., Шетеля В. В. Карієсрезистентність як детектор стану твердих тканин зубів. Проблеми клінічної
педіатрії. 2020. 4. С. 119–122.
Макєєв В. Ф., Микиєвич Н. І. Експериментальне вивчення щільності прилягання прямих і непрямих реставрацій
до твердих тканин зуба. Сучасна стоматологія. 2018. № 1. С. 94–98.
Робсон Д. Реставрації бічних зубів з використанням Admira Fusion. Новини стоматології. 2020. 4. С. 45–46.
Удод О. А., Вороніна Г. С. Сучасні тенденції та підходи до прогнозування карієсу зубів. Новини стоматології. 2019.
№ 1. С. 75–79.
Blatz M. B., Chiche G., Bahat O., Roblee R., Coachman C., Heymann H. O. Evolution of Aesthetic Dentistry. J Dent Res. 2019.
Nov. 98(12). P. 1294–1304. doi: 10.1177/0022034519875450.
Lauren Pilcher, Sarah Pahlke, Olivia Urquhart. Direct materials for restoring caries lesions: Systematic review and metaanalysis-
a report of the American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs. J Am Dent Assoc. 2023 Feb;154(2):e1-e98.
doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2022.09.012. Epub 2023 Jan 5. PMID: 36610925.
Guney T., Yazici A. R. 24-Month Clinical Evaluation of Different Bulk-Fill Restorative Resins in Class II Restorations.
Oper Dent. 2020. № 45(2). Р. 123–133.
Francesco Ricardo Bernales Sender, José Alberto Castañeda Vía, Lidia Yileng Tay. Influence of different phosphoric acids
before application of universal adhesive on the dental enamel. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2020 Dec;32(8):797-805. doi: 10.1111/
jerd.12636.
Schwendicke F., Göstemeyer G., Blunck U., Paris S, Hsu L-Y., Tu Y-K. Directly Placed Restorative Materials: Review and
Network Meta-analysis. J Dent Res. 2016. Jun. 95(6). Р. 613–22. doi: 10.1177/0022034516631285.
Szczesio-Wlodarczyk A., Domarecka M., Kopacz K., Sokolowski J., Bociong K. An Evaluation of the Properties of Urethane
Dimethacrylate-Based Dental Resins. Materials (Basel). 2021 May 21;14(11):2727. doi: 10.3390/ma14112727. PMID:
, PMCID: PMC8196897.
Wen Zhou, Shiyu Liu, Xuedong Zhou, Matthias Hannig, Stefan Rupf, Jin Feng. Modifying Adhesive Materials to Improve
the Longevity of Resinous Restorations. Int J Mol Sci. 2019. Feb 8. 20(3). Р. 723. doi: 10.3390/ijms20030723.