UNFAIRNESS OF TRADEMARK APPLICANTS: ANALYSIS OF FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC LEGISLATIVE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT PRACTICE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32689/2617-9660-2020-5(11)-24-42Keywords:
examination, brand, bad faith of the applicant, patent attorney, squatter, amount of damage, trademark, digital search, artificial intelligence, fine.Abstract
The article examines the economic and legal aspects of foreign (in the jurisdictions of China, USA, EU) and domestic legislative and law enforcement practices to combat the phenomenon of unfair registration of personalization with an emphasis on trademarks and domain names. The formation of theoretical, methodological and methodological bases for the protection of the rights of their owners, improving the efficiency of experts of intellectual property agencies, forensic experts, digital search tools and the use of artificial intelligence as a key factor in ensuring the effectiveness of this process. The world dynamics of filing applications for trademark registration, the place of Ukraine, the organizational and economic content of the phenomenon of «trademark squatting» are analyzed. The regulatory framework and practice of the Chinese Trademark Office to establish a verification system to detect and reject fraudulent trademark applications, the preventive measures taken against squatters, digital search tools and the use of artificial intelligence as key factors to ensure effective operation. It is shown that the amendments to the Law on Trademarks of the People’s Republic of China include six articles, the purpose of which is to more effectively combat unscrupulous applicants, malicious programs, and impose significant fines for trademark infringement. The means of counteracting unscrupulous applicants in the USA have been studied. The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has developed rules under which foreign applicants and trademark owners must be represented by a U.S. licensed attorney when filing trademark applications with the USPTO. Features of registration in the USA of the trademarks given by the Chinese citizens are considered. The analysis of the last changes in the legislation of Ukraine on protection of trade marks is carried out. It is shown that the new rules change the approaches to registration and protection of trademarks, create the possibility of their fair use. The concept of dishonesty of the applicant, its understanding in legal theory, place in the EU legislation, legal consequences of dishonesty of the applicant are considered. It is concluded that the inclusion in the national legislation of the definition of bad faith of the applicant when filing an application for trademark registration will be of important preventive importance.
References
World Intellectual Property Indicators: Filings for Patents, Trademarks, Industrial Designs Reach Record Heights in 2019. URL:https://www.wipo.int/pressroom/ en/articles/2019/article_0012.html
Андрощук Г.О. Недобросовісність заявника: аналіз зарубіжної практики правозастосування// Судова експертиза об’єктів інтелектуальної власності: теорія і практика : науково-практ. збірн.; НДІ ітелектуальної власності НАПрН України. Випуск 6. К. : Інтерсервіс, 2020. С.15-24.
Paolo Beconcini China Trademark Office Attempts to Curb Bad Faith Filings. URL: http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2019/03/07/ china-trademark-office-attempts-curb-badfaith- filings/id=107062/
Андрощук Г.О. .Lego vs Lepin – рішення на користь LEGO//Інтелектуальна власність в Україні. – 2020 .- №7 –С.27-29.
Андрощук Г.О. Перемога Dunhill vs Danhouli//Інтелектуальна власність в Україні. – 2020 .- №7 –С.30-32.
Геннадій Андрощук Битва автогігантів. Land Rover виграв у суді в китайського Jiangling Motors/ URL: http:// yur-gazeta.com/publications/practice/zahistintelektualnoyi- vlasnosti-avtorske-pravo/ bitva-avtogigantiv.html
Геннадій Андрощук Шанхайський суд оголосив вирок злочинцям, які пору- шили авторські права Lego. URL:https:// yur-gazeta.com/golovna/shanhayskiy-sudogolosiv- virok-zlochincyam-yaki-porushiliavtorski- prava-lego.html
Геннадій Андрощук Винороби Бордо захистили географічне зазначення в китайському суді. URL: https://yur-gazeta. com/publications/practice/inshe/vinorobibordo- zahistili-geografichne-zaznachennyav- kitayskomu-sudi.html
С 1 марта в Китае вступят в силу новые правила для патентных агентств URL:http://russian.cri.cn/news/ homeList/380/20190225/253410.html
Amendments to China’s Trademark Law will be implemented on November 1, 2019 CCPIT Patent & Trademark Law Office. URL: https://www.lexology.com/library/ detail.aspx?g=c4d04dde-9f47-48ba-b862- 07fb4de98bfa
China IP cases surge amid US complaints, Beijing push for technology self-reliance. URL: https://www.scmp.com/ economy/global-economy/article/3086313/ china-ip-cases-surge-amid-us-complaintsbeijing- push
Steve Brachmann USPTO to Propose Rule Requiring Foreign Trademark Applicants to Use U.S. Licensed Attorneys to File Documents URL: http://www.ipwatchdog. co m / 2 0 1 8 / 1 1 / 0 3 / u s p t o - r u l e - r e q u i r e - foreign-trademark-applicants-u-s-licensedattorneys/ id=102872/
Демченко Т.С. Недобросовісність заявника у законодавстві про товарні знаки: Монографія. — К.: TOB «Лазурит — Поліграф», 2008. — 94 с.
John Mc Elwaine Tackling bad faith registration of domain names in a fastchanging landscape. URL: https://www.wipo. int/wipo_magazine/en/2019/06/article_0006. html
.Боденгаузен Г. Паризька конвенція з охорони промислової власності: Коментар / Переклад з англійської, передмова, наукова редакція. Г. О. Андрощука. – К.:Парламентське видавництво, 2018. – 264 с.