TRANSFER TO THE STATE TREASURY OF THE PROPERTY OF WAR SUPPORTERS IN THE LIGHT OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF POLAND. LEGAL ASPECTS IN THE CONTEXT OF THE PARLIAMENTARY BILL ON THE AMENDMENT OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF POLAND
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32689/2617-9660-2022-5(23)-79-89Keywords:
Constitution, expropriation, forfeiture, property rights, property.Abstract
Abstract. This paper contains an analysis of the issue of the scope and manner of restriction of the right to property on the grounds of the provisions of the Constitution of the Republic of Poland of 2 April 1997 (Journal of Laws of 1997, No. 78, item 483, as amended), hereinafter referred to as the Constitution, in the context of the Parliamentary bill on the amendment of the Constitution of the Republic of Poland of 7 April 2022 (print no. 2263). This draft postulates the introduction of Chapter XIa, entitled Threat to State Security, into the Constitution and containing a single provision, Article 234a, stipulating the premises for the State Treasury’s seizure of the assets of entities supporting armed aggression located on the territory of Poland. The rationale for the need to introduce the described editorial unit into the Basic Law is, in the opinion of the drafters, the need for the Polish state to respond to the aggression of the Russian Federation against Ukraine that began on 24 February 2022. At the same time, it should be emphasized, that the assets seized in the above-described manner would be used in full to support the victims of Russian aggression. This amendment, which is indispensable in the opinion of the drafters – in the face of Russian aggression against Ukraine – will be assessed by the author of the study in the light of the provisions of the Constitution regulating the general prerequisites of property restriction (preservation of the statutory basis, noninfringement of the essence of the right to property, justification of the restriction by one of the values..indicated in Article 31(3) Constitution and preservation of the principle of proportionality), the prerequisites of expropriation and forfeiture. At the same time, in this summary, the author would like to point out that entities financially supporting the actions of the Russian Federation vis-à-vis Ukraine can and should be subject to sanctions in the form of seizure of their assets located on the territory of Poland, because Russian aggression war is a manifestation of an action that finds no justification.
References
https://orka.sejm.gov.pl/Druki9ka.nsf/ 0/341E28959467AD4CC12588440069E3C4/% 24File/2263.pdf
Constitution of the Republic of Poland of 2 April 1997 (Journal of Laws of 1997, No. 78, item 483, as amended).
Kociubiński P. T., Powojenne przekształcenia własnościowe w świetle Konstytucji, Warsaw 2013, p. 83; Jarosz – Żukowska S., Konstytucyjna zasada ochrony własności, Krakow 2003, p. 35.
Burda A., Polish State Law, Warsaw 1977, p. 59.
Rozmaryn S., Konstytucja jako ustawa zasadnicza PRL, Warsaw 1961, p.
Judgment of the TK of 21 March 2000, K 14/99, OTK 2000, no. 2, item 61.
Judgment of the TK of 12 January 2000, P 11/98, OTK 2000, no. 1, item 3.
Rudnicki S., Commentary to the Civil Code. Book two. Własność i inne prawa rzeczowe, Warsaw 1999, p. 10.
Jarosz – Żukowska S., Constitutional principle of property protection, Kraków 2003, p. 105.
Skrzydło W., Konstytucja RP. Commentary, Cracow 2002, p. 24.
Jarosz – Żukowska S., Constitutional principle of property protection, Kraków 2003, p. 107.
Judgment of the TK of 25 February 1999, K 23/98, OTK 1992, no. 2, item 25.
Kociubiński P. T., Powojenne przekształcenia własnościowe w świetle Konstytucji, Warsaw 2013, p. 95.
Zoll F., Z zagadnień funkcjonalizmu własności na tle spuścizny po Leonie Duguit, Toruń 1947, p. 2.
Judgment of the TK in case P 11/98, OTK 2000, no. 1, item 3.
Kociubiński P. T., Powojenne przekształcenia własnościowe w świetle Konstytucji, Warsaw 2013, p. 95.
Judgment of the TK of 12 January 1999, P 2/98, OTK 1999, no. 1, item 2.
Judgment of the TK of 12 January 1999, P 2/98, OTK 1999, no. 1, item 2.
Judgment of the TK of 19 May 1998, U 5/97, OTK 1998, no. 4, item 46.
Judgment of the TK in case P 2/98, OTK 1999, no. 1, item 2.
Judgment of the CT in case K 23/98, OTK 1992, no. 2, item 25.
Judgment of the TK in case P 2/98, OTK 1999, no. 1, item 2.
Kociubiński P. T., Powojenne przekształcenia własnościowe w świetle Konstytucji, Warsaw 2013, p. 117.
Judgment of the TK of 8 May 1990, K 1/90, OTK 1990, no. 1, item 2.
Judgment of the TK of 19 June 1990, K 2/90, OTK 1990, no. 1, item 3.`
Jarosz – Żukowska S., Constitutional principle of property protection, Kraków 2003, p. 170.
Basic Law of the Federal Republic of Germany of 23 May 1949 (BGBl. 1949 S. 1, as amended).
Basic Law of the Federal Republic of Germany of 23 May 1949 (BGBl. 1949 S. 1, as amended).
https://www.adwokatura.pl/ a d m i n / w g r a n e _ p l i k i / f i l e - o p i n i a - z m - konstytucji-33486.pdf
Judgment of the TK of 7 October 2021, K 3/21, OJ. 2021, item 1852, Legalis 2613143.
Kociubiński P. T., Powojenne przekształcenia własnościowe w świetle Konstytucji, Warsaw 2013, p. 137.
Judgment of the TK of 13 July 2004, P 20/03, OTK-A 2004, No. 7, item 64.
Judgment of the TK of 6 October 1998, K 36/97, OTK 1998, No. 5, item 65.
Kociubiński P. T., Powojenne przekształcenia własnościowe w świetle Konstytucji, Warsaw 2013, p. 140.
Judgment of the Constitutional Tribunal in case P 20/03, OTK-A 2004, no. 7, item 64;Banaszak B., Constitution of the Republic of Poland. Commentary, Warsaw 2012, p. 293.
Winczorek P., Commentary to the Constitution of the Republic of Poland of 2 April 1997, Warsaw 2008, p. 113.
Banaszak B. , Constitution of the Republic of Poland. Commentary, Warsaw 2012. Burda A., Polish State Law, Warsaw 1977, p. 293.
Sarnecki P., Article 46, in L. Garlicki, Konstytucja Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej, vol. 3, Warsaw 2016, p. 2.
Judgment of the SA in Łódź – 1st Civil Division of 28 March 2014, I ACa 1278/13, LEX No. 1451723.
Act of 23 April 1964, Civil Code (i.e., 2017 U. of 2017, item 459, as amended).
Judgment of the Constitutional Court of 14 March 2000, P. 5/99, OTK ZU 2000, No. 2, item 60; judgment of the Constitutional Court of 10 May 2000, K 21/99, OTK ZU 2000, No. 4, item 109; judgment of the Constitutional Court of 7 February 2001, K 27/00, OTK ZU 2001, No. 2, item 29; judgment of the Constitutional Court of 27 April 2005, P 1/05, OJ of 2005, No. 77, item 680.
Sroka T., (in:) M. Safjan, L. Bosek (eds), The Constitution of the Republic of Poland. T I. Commentary to Articles 1-86, Warsaw 2016, Legalis.