BIG DATA AS A POLITICAL TECHNOLOGY AND ITS SIGNIFICANCE FOR POLITICAL SCIENCE AND PRACTICE: EPISTEMOLOGICAL, METHODOLOGICAL AND INSTITUTIONAL DIMENSIONS OF DIGITAL GOVERNANCE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32689/2523-4625-2025-1(77)-16Keywords:
Big Data, Big Tech, political technology, digital governance, data epistemology, political agency, democracyAbstract
This article presents a comprehensive study of Big Data as a political technology that radically transforms the structure of the political process, the logic of decision-making, and the interaction between government, society, and technological platforms. The relevance of this research stems from the fact that in today’s world, data has become a strategic resource that not only provides new analytical capabilities but also shapes new conditions for the functioning of the political system as a whole. The purpose of this review study is to comprehensivelyunderstand big data as a political technology that influences the epistemological foundations of political knowledge,changes the methodology of Political Science, and transforms the institutional practices of digital governance.The article was prepared through analysis of the conceptual origins of the Big Data phenomenon, identificationof key epistemological changes, investigation of methodological transformations, and characteristics of the socio- political construction of big data as an instrument of power. The research demonstrates that Big Data has a “variable ontology” and represents not neutral digital arrays but a socio-technical constellation that takes shapein a specific political and institutional context. The methodological shift in Political Science is analyzed, whichconsists in the transition from selectivity to totality, from causality to correlation, radically changing the ways hypotheses are formulated. It has been stated that technology corporations have transformed from economic actors into “super policy participants” who possess data on the behavior of billions of people and communication infrastructure that has become the “infrastructure of democracy”. Comparative analysis of Big Data usage inChina, the USA, and the EU revealed different approaches to data governance depending on the political regime.Based on the review and research results, it is concluded that the transformation brought by the Big Data era often involves the redistribution of political agency and changes in decision-making subjects. Key Big Data challengesin this regard are identified: dealgorithmization of responsibility, strengthening citizens’ digital autonomy, and rethinking democracy in the digital age. Thus, political agency in the Big Data era is defined as the ability not only to adapt to new digital realities but also to rethink politics as a practice of collective knowledge in conditions of information surplus, where the human factor remains key in the political process.
References
Anderson C. The end of theory: The data deluge makes the scientific method obsolete. Wired Magazine. 2008. Vol. 16, No. 7. URL: https://www.wired.com/2008/06/pb-theory/
Boyd D., Crawford K. Critical questions for big data. Information, Communication & Society. 2012. Vol. 15, No. 5. P. 662–679.
Bucher T. If ... Then: Algorithmic power and politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018. 211 p.
Chun W. H. K. Programmed visions: Software and memory. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2011. 239 p.
Elish M. C., Boyd D. Situating methods in the magic of Big Data and AI. Communication Monographs. 2018. Vol. 85, No. 1. P. 57–80.
Filipenko A. Digital economy: Theoretical and applied aspect. Ekonomichna Teoriia. 2020. No. 2. P. 54–66.
Fiormonte D., Numerico T., Tomasi F. The digital humanist: A critical inquiry. Brooklyn: Punctum Books, 2015. 262 p.
Gitelman L. (Ed.). Raw Data Is an Oxymoron (Infrastructures). Cambridge: MIT Press, 2013. 182 p.
Khanal S., Zhang H., Taeihagh A. Why and how is the power of Big Tech increasing in the policy process? The case of generative AI. Policy and Society. 2025. Vol. 44, No. 1. P. 52–69.
Kingdon J. W. Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. Boston: HarperCollins, 1984. 250 p.
Kitchin R. Big Data, new epistemologies and paradigm shifts. Big Data & Society. 2014. Vol. 1, No. 1. P. 1–12.
Kitchin R. The data revolution: Big Data, open data, data infrastructures and their consequences. London: SAGE Publications, 2014. 240 p.
Krasnyuk M., Hrashchenko I., Datsko O. Methodology of effective application of Big Data and Data Mining technologies as an important anti-crisis component of the complex policy of logistic business optimization. Scientific Bulletin of the National Mining University. 2018. No. 3. P. 123–130.
Krukovets D. Data Science opportunities at central banks: Overview. Visnyk of the National Bank of Ukraine. 2020. No. 249. P. 13–24.
Lagoze C. Big data, data integrity, and the fracturing of the control zone. Big Data & Society. 2014. Vol. 1, No. 2.
Lanier J. Who owns the future?. New York: Simon and Schuster, 2014. 448 p.
Mackenzie A. Cutting code: Software and sociality. New York: Peter Lang, 2006. 216 p.
Mattoni A., Pavan E. Politics, participation and Big Data. Introductory reflections on the ontological, epistemological, and methodological aspects of a complex relationship. Partecipazione e Conflitto. 2018. Vol. 11, No. 2. P. 198–206.
Mayer-Schönberger V., Cukier K. Big Data: A revolution that will transform how we live, work, and think. Boston: Harper Business, 2014. 272 p.
Numerico T. Politics and epistemology of big data: A critical assessment. Berkich D., d’Alfonso M. V. (Eds.). On the Cognitive, Ethical, and Scientific Dimensions of Artificial Intelligence. Cham: Springer, 2019. P. 147–166.
Tian W. The application of big data in modern national economy and politics. Administrative Consulting. 2021. No. 11. P. 133–142.
Wagner-Pacifici R., Mohr J. W., Breiger R. L. Ontologies, methodologies, and new uses of big data in the social and cultural sciences. Big Data & Society. 2015. Vol. 2, No. 2. P. 1–11.
Zuboff S. The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. New York: Public Affairs, 2019. 704 p.