ANALYSIS OF INTERNATIONAL EXPERIENCE IN BUILDING ECONOMIC SECURITY INSTITUTIONS

Abstract

The article examines the experience of developed countries in creating sustainable institutions that ensure economic security and promote the stability of social and economic processes. The main focus is on the analysisof legal systems, governmental structures, financial institutions and other organizations that play a key role in ensuring macroeconomic balance and the effectiveness of anti-corruption measures.The author emphasizes the importance of adaptability of institutions to changes and challenges, emphasizing that this ability ensures their long-term stability. In the context of this analysis, the examples of the United States ofAmerica, Sweden and Singapore are considered. Each of these countries is presented as a model of efficiency dueto special approaches to the organization of the civil service, ensuring legal independence and implementing anti- corruption programs.In particular, the US emphasizes the importance of the Pendleton Act (1883), which introduced a meritocraticsystem in the civil service. The Swedish model, known for its social justice and high level of income redistribution, demonstrates the synergy between economic growth and social protection. Singapore, in turn, is an example of a country that has achieved economic sustainability and development due to a strict anti-corruption policy and professionalism of the civil service.The article also analyzes Ukraine’s current challenges, which make it difficult to build sustainable institutions.The ongoing war with Russia, political instability, and low levels of trust in government agencies pose significant obstacles to the country’s economic security. The author suggests that effective adaptation of international experience should take into account the specifics of the Ukrainian context, including political, economic, and cultural features.In conclusion, the author emphasizes the need for an integrated approach to reforms, which involves ensuring the independence of the judiciary, creating an anti-corruption infrastructure, developing electronic services, and strengthening social justice. The borrowing of foreign models should be accompanied by a thorough analysis oftheir compatibility with Ukrainian conditions, involvement of civil society and monitoring of the effectiveness of theimplemented reforms.