PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP IN THE SPHERE OF RESOURCE PROVISION OF REGIONAL AND LOCAL DEVELOPMENT

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32689/2618-0065-2025-1(17)-07

Keywords:

region, local government, public-private partnership, innovations in public administration, reforms in public administration

Abstract

In conditions of sufficiently high decentralization of public power in European countries, such a form of cooperation with private capital as «public-private partnership» is developing. The latter in the conditions of the national economy more likely corresponds to the category of «public-private partnership», under the conditions of using the practice of joint economic activity in the direction of resource provision development. For Ukraine, the transition to effective public administration, and subsequently to partnership, can guarantee social stability and increase the efficiency of management of the economic system, especially in conditions of decentralization. However, the transition process is complicated by internal contradictions – corruption, unfair competition, insufficiently low quality of public services, etc. Therefore, it is necessary to create real mechanisms for overcoming negative phenomena and prerequisites for the implementation of effective partnership projects that require modernization of state policy in the field of business and entrepreneurship on the basis of open and real partnership. 5.) Based on the main scientific results of administrative and legal research, national and international experience, it is necessary to optimize the activities of state management and control bodies with the aim of further implementation in the practical activities of central bodies or local self-government bodies. At the legislative level, it is important to take into account the latest trends in the modernization of state management and administration, including a management experiment in the direction of resource provision. Recently, the activity of various types of public associations, associations and their bodies (Association of Village, Settlement, City Councils of Ukraine, Ukrainian Association of Local and Regional Self-Government Bodies, Association of Heads of Local and Regional Self-Government Bodies, etc.), Governments, Association of Heads of Local and Regional Self-Government Bodies, which are trying to influence the formation of regional and local policy in Ukraine, has increased. Together with other socio-political entities (regional branches of political parties and blocs, trade unions, associations representing the interests of business entities, various segments of the population, etc.), these associations can be attributed to the so-called «pressure groups» on the central and regional authorities.

References

Meadowcroft J. Participatory democracy and sustainable development: Problems of operationalization // Policy Sciences. 2007. Vol. 40, № 3. P. 249–268. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-007-9040-6

Biermann F. Earth System Governance: World Politics in the Anthropocene. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2014.

Jordan A., Lenschow A. Environmental policy integration: a state of the art review // Environmental Policy and Governance. 2010. Vol. 20, № 3. P. 147–158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.539

Pierre J., Peters B. G. Governance, Politics and the State. 2nd ed. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2020.

European Commission. The European Green Deal. Brussels, 2019. URL: https://commission.europa.eu

Воротін В., Проданик В. Стратегічне бачення європейського державотворення та ресурсно-екологічна складова згуртованості публічного управління в Україні // Збірник наукових праць. 2024. Вип. 10. С. 26–36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31470/2786-6246-2024-10-26-3

Воротін В., Проданик В. Ресурсно-екологічна складова регіонального управління за умов воєнного стану в Україні // Державне будівництво. 2024. № 2(36). URL: https://periodicals.karazin.ua/db/issue/view/1527/PDF%202024-2

Організація Об’єднаних Націй. Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development: Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015 (A/RES/70/1). 2015. URL: https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda

Chorna O., Orlova I. S., Shyshliuk V., Pugachov M., Pugachov V. Anti-Crisis regulation of enterprises through digital management // International Journal of Professional Business Review. 2023. Vol. 8, № 5. P. 90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v11i3.816

Radchenko O., Nepomnyashchyy O., Marusheva O., Prav R., Shandryk V. Efficiency of strategic public investment management in the construction sector // International Journal for Quality Research. 2023. Vol. 17, № 3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24874/IJQR17.03-13

Masyk M., Buryk Z., Radchenko O., Saienko V., Dziurakh Y. Criteria for governance’ institutional effectiveness and quality in the context of sustainable development tasks // International Journal for Quality Research. 2023. Vol. 17, № 2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24874/IJQR17.02-13

Shmalenko I., Yeftieni N., Semenets-Orlova I. Impact of social media influencers on public policy and political discourse // International Conference on Social Science, Psychology and Legal Regulation (SPL 2021). 2021, December. P. 88–93. Atlantis Press.

Shchokin R., Soloviov O., Tantsiura I. Public management in the sphere of national and state security: Concepts and strategies // Multidisciplinary Reviews. 2024. Vol. 7, 2024spe041. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31893/multirev.2024spe041

Yermachenko V., Bondarenko D., Akimova L., Karpa M., Akimov O., Kalashnyk N. Theory and practice of public management of smart infrastructure in the conditions of the digital society’s development: Socio-economic aspects // Economic Affairs. 2023. Vol. 68, № 1. P. 617–633. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46852/0424-2513.1.2023.29

Published

2025-06-30