THEORETICAL FUNDAMENTALS OF INDUSTRIAL POLICY

Authors

  • Volodymyr Vydobora Odessa National Economic University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32689/2523-4536/66-1

Keywords:

industrial policy, research methods, economic growth, state regulation, institutions

Abstract

The article is devoted to the study of the problem of formation of scientific and methodological bases for the study of industrial policy. The purpose of the article is to form a scientific and methodological basis for the study of industrial policy, given the evolution of the paradigm of industrial policy in the leading currents of economic theory. To solve this scientific problem, general and specific methods of scientific research, such as: analysis, synthesis, deduction, induction, generalization, historical-logical approach and the method of convergence from the abstract to the concreted are used. The article substantiates the need to apply a historical and logical approach to the study of industrial policy, which allows taking into account the multiplicity of historical conditions and manifestations of social relations and economic laws, as well as understanding the logic of their formation and change under various factors. According to this method, the main approaches to determining the nature and role of industrial policy in economic growth, covered in the provisions of the main scientific schools of economics: historical, Keynesian, neoclassical and institutional. It is found that the researchers’ approaches to understanding the basics of industrial policy demonstrate the inseparability of the unity of such institutions as public policy and the industrial market. Based on the analysis of existing paradigms for understanding the essence of industrial policy, the author's exchange of industrial policy as a complex of organizational, legal and financial-economic relations between public authorities and institutional industrial entities, regulated by laws and regulations and aimed at increasing competitiveness of industrial products, profitability of industrial enterprises and innovative development of industrial infrastructure at the national, regional and sectoral levels are formed. It is emphasized that the model of industrial policy, as well as the role of the state and the market in it, depends on the historical formation and existing institutional and economic conditions in the country.

References

Андрианов К. Н. и др. Промышленная политика в условиях новой индустриализации : монография / Под ред. Толкачева С. А. Москва : МАКС Пресс, 2015. 252 с.

Бакунин А. В. Советский тоталитаризм: генезис, эволюция, крушение. Екатеринбург, 1993. 110 с.

Bianchi P., Labory S. From «old» industrial policy to «new» industrial development policies // International Bianchi P., Labory S. handbook on industrial policy. Ed. by P. Bianchi and S. Labory. Cheltenham, UK, Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar, 2006, Р. 3–27.

Beath J. UK Industrial Policy: Old Tunes on New Instruments? Oxford Review of Economic Policy. 2002. Vol. 18, №2. P. 221−239.

Warwick K. Beyond Industrial Policy: Emerging Issues and New Trends. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers, no. 2. OECD Publishing. 2013. 56 p.

Дементьев В. Что мы исследуем, когда исследуем институты? Terra Economicus. 2009. Т. 7, № 1. С. 13–30.

Звєряков М. І. Промислова політика і механізм її реалізації. Економіка України. 2016. № 6. С. 3–18.

Карр Э. История Советской России: в 14 т. Москва, 1990. Кн. 1. Т. 2. 771 с.

Кейнс Дж. М. Общая теория занятости, процента и денег. Санкт-Петербург. Москва : Гелиос Арв. 2015. 352 с.

Лист Ф. Национальная система политической экономии. Москва : Европа, 2005. 382 с.

Nowak M., Highfield R. Super Cooperators: Altruism, Evolution, and Why We Need Each Other to Succeed. N. Y.: Free-Press. 2012. 352 p.

Rodrik D. Industrial Policy for the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge: Harvard University, 2004. 57 p.

Розенфельд Я. С. Промышленная политика СССР (1917–1925). Москва : Плановое хозяйство, 1926. 289 с.

Simon H. Altruism and economics. The American Economic Review. 1993. Vol. 83, № 2. Р. 156–161.

Federico G. (Eds.), Foreman-Peck J. European Industrial Policy: Introduction. European industrial policy: The twentieth-century experience. N. Y.: Oxford University Press, 1999. P. 1−17.

Foreman-Peck J. Industrial policy in Europe in the 20th century. EIB Papers. 2006. Vol. 11, № 1. Р. 36–62.

Худокормов А. Г. История экономических учений. Глава 21. § 2. Кейнсианские концепции “большого толчка”. Москва : Инфра-М, 1998. С. 451–459.

Видобора В. В. Еволюція теорій і парадигм промислової політики. Економічний простір. 2021. № 165. С. 7–12.

Видобора В. В. Наукові засади промислової політики: зарубіжний досвід. Вісник КНУТД. Серія : Економічні науки. 2020. № 4 (149). С. 17–26.

Andrianov K. N., Tolkacheva S.A. (Ed.) et al. (2015). Promyshlennaya politika v usloviyakh novoy industrializatsii [Industrial policy in the context of new industrialization]. Moskva: MAKS Press. (in Russian)

Bakunin A.V . (1993). Sovetskiy totalitarizm: genezis, evolyutsiya, krushenie [Soviet totalitarianism: genesis, evolution, collapse]. Ekaterinburg. (in Russian)

Bianchi P., Labory S. (2006). From «old» industrial policy to «new» industrial development policies. Cheltenham, UK, Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar, pp. 3–27.

Beath J. (2002). UK Industrial Policy: Old Tunes on New Instruments? Oxford Review of Economic Policy, vol. 18, no. 2. pp. 221−239.

Warwick K. (2013). Beyond Industrial Policy: Emerging Issues and New Trends. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers, no. 2. OECD Publishing.

Dement’ev V. (2009). Chto my issleduem, kogda issleduem instituty? [What do we study when we study institutions?]. Terra Economicus, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 13–30. (in Russian)

Zvieriakov M. I. (2016). Promyslova polityka i mekhanizm yii realizatsii [Industrial policy and mechanism of implementation]. Ekonomika Ukrainy, no. 6, pp. 3–18. (in Ukrainian)

Karr E. (1990). Istoriya Sovetskoy Rossii [History of Soviet Russia]. Book. 1, vol. 2. Moksva. (in Russian)

Keyns Dzh. M. (2015). Obshchaya teoriya zanyatosti, protsenta i deneg [General theory of employment, interest and money]. Sankt-Peterburg. Moskva : Gelios Arv. (in Russian)

List F. (2005). Natsional’naya sistema politicheskoy ekonomii [National system of political economy]. Moskva : Evropa. (in Russian)

Nowak M., Highfield R. (2012). Super Cooperators: Altruism, Evolution, and Why We Need Each Other to Succeed. N. Y.: Free-Press.

Rodrik D. (2004). Industrial Policy for the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge: Harvard University.

Rozenfel’d Ya.S. (1926). Promyshlennaya politika SSSR (1917–1925) [Industrial policy of the USSR (1917–1925)]. Moskva : Planovoe khozyaystvo. (in Russian)

Simon H. (1993). Altruism and economics. The American Economic Review, vol. 83, no. 2, pp. 156–161.

Federico G. (Ed.), Foreman-Peck J. (1999). European Industrial Policy: Introduction. European industrial policy: The twentieth-century experience. N.Y.: Oxford University Press, pp. 1−17.

Foreman-Peck J. (2006). Industrial policy in Europe in the 20th century. EIB Papers, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 36–62.

Khudokormov A. G. (1998). Istoriya ekonomicheskikh ucheniy [History of Economic Thought]. Ch. 21. § 2. Keynsianskie kontseptsii “bol’shogo tolchka”. Moskva : Infra-M. (in Russian)

Vydobora V. V. (2021). Evoliutsiia teorii i paradyhm promyslovoi polityky [Evolution of theories and paradigms of industrial policy]. Ekonomichnyi prostir, no. 165, pp. 7–12. (in Ukrainian)

Vydobora V. V. (2020). Naukovi zasady promyslovoi polityky: zarubizhnyi dosvid [Scientific principles of industrial policy: foreign experience]. Visnyk KNUTD. Seriia : Ekonomichni nauky, no. 4 (149), pp.17–26. (in Ukrainian)

Published

2022-09-30