FRAGMENTATION OF THE GLOBAL ECONOMY

Authors

  • Volodymyr Duran Postgraduate Student, State University “Uzhhorod National University”

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32689/2523-4536/77-23

Keywords:

financial crisis, economic integration, economic globalization, fragmentation, international economic relations, global economy

Abstract

This article explores the fragmentation of the global economy. It has been identified that most scholars tend to believe that the global economy is facing fragmentation in institutional, economic, and social aspects. Rising geopolitical tensions and the uneven distribution of past gains from globalization have contributed to growing skepticism regarding the attractiveness of inward-oriented policies. It is argued that increasing economic fragmentation does not necessarily reduce immigration, and it remains unclear whether immigration policy always has the expected effect. In recent decades, free trade has largely defined the global economy. However, geopolitical differences and conflicts increasingly prompt governments to raise tariffs and revive the use of industrial policies to stimulate national economic development or competitiveness. As a result, economic ties are being severed, and trade routes are being reshaped. Efforts are being made in various world regions to strengthen economic ties and expand free trade. There are also no signs of a systematic retreat in trade globalization due to geopolitical events. Trade relations and supply chains continue to evolve over time, reflecting economic and technological evolution, including adaptation to geopolitical factors. However, apart from some occasional instances of radical ruptures in the geopolitical landscape, global trade integration continued to move forward, sometimes with setbacks. Research on international trade has shown that political distance matters for international commerce through three main channels: the tendency to sign a trade agreement or grant preferential treatment, the likelihood of imposing economic sanctions and serious diplomatic incidents that lead to trade sanctions, and consumer sentiments and preferences. Wealth inequality, the dominance of transnational corporations, and the fragmentation of global supply chains have become hot political issues. Developing countries should focus on regional trade blocs and building resilience. The new global geo-economics landscape may require the EU to pivot toward economic security, even beyond the shift that has already occurred. However, economic security should not become an excuse for protectionism, and it should preserve international cooperation.

References

Colantone I, Staning P. The Economic Determinants of the Cultural Backlash: Globalization and Attitudes in Western Europe. 2018. SSRN Electronic Journal. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3267139

Bloom N., Furceri D. & Hites A. Tracking uncertainty in a rapidly changing global economic outlook. VoxEU. 2022. URL: https://cepr.org/voxeu/columns/tracking-uncertainty-rapidly-changing-global-economic-outlook

Freund C., Mattoo A., Mulabdic A. & Ruta M. Is US Trade Policy Reshaping Global Supply Chains? Policy Research Working Papers. The World Bank. 2023. URL: https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099812010312311610/pdf/IDU0938e50fe0608704ef70b7d005cda58b5af0d.pdf

Mansfield E.D., Milner H.V. & Rosendorff B.P. Free to Trade: Democracies, Autocracies, and International Trade. The American Political Science Review. 2020. No. 94(2). P. 305–321.

Jakubik A., Ruta M. Trading with friends in uncertain times. Journal of Policy Modeling. 2023. Vol. 45(4). P. 768-780.

Shibli A. Our world is becoming economically fragmented. 2023. URL: https://www.thedailystar.net/opinion/views/open-dialogue/news/our-world-becoming-economically-fragmented-3251391

Pisani-Ferry J., Weder di Mauro B. & Zettelmeyer J. European economic security in an age of interdependence. 2024. URL: https://cepr.org/voxeu/columns/european-economic-security-age-interdependence

Rodrik D. Populism and the economics of globalization. Journal of International Business Policy. 2018. Vol. 1(1). P. 12-33.

Pastor L., Veronesi P. Inequality aversion, populism, and the backlash against globalization. 2021. URL: https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w24900/w24900.pdf

Hoshino T., Ahara K., Maeda K. The Fragmentation of the Global Economy: Migration, Trade, and FDI Reshaping the World? 2024. URL: https://www.dlri.co.jp/english/report_en/202410Three.html

Aiyar S. et all. Geoeconomic Fragmentation and the Future of Multilateralism. 2023. 42 p. URL: https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/Staff-Discussion-Notes/Issues/2023/01/11/Geo-Economic-Fragmentation-and-the-Future-of-Multilateralism-527266

IMF Blog. The High Cost of Global Economic Fragmentation. 2023. URL: https://www.imf.org/en/Blogs/Articles/2023/08/28/the-high-cost-of-global-economic-fragmentation

Foundethakis M., Subban V. Africa: The African Continental Free Trade Area Investment Protocol – The start of a new era in sustainable trade and investment. 2024. URL: https://www.globalcompliancenews.com/2024/04/06/https-insightplus-bakermckenzie-com-bm-international-commercial-trade-africa-the-african-continental-free-trade-area-investment-protocol-the-start-of-a-new-era-in-sustainable-trade-and-investment_03/

Campos R. et all. Geopolitical fragmentation and trade. 2023. URL https://cepr.org/voxeu/columns/geopolitical-fragmentation-and-trade

Fajgelbaum P., Khandelwal A. The Economic Impacts of the US-China. 2022. URL: https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w29315/w29315.pdf

Cerdeiro D., Mano R., Eugster J., Muir D., Peiris S. Sizing Up the Effects of Technological Decoupling. IMF Working Papers. 2021. No. 69. 39 р.

Gourinchas P.O. Shifting Geopolitical Tectonic Plates. IMF Finance and Development. 2022. URL: https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/fandd/issues/2022/06/shifting-geopolitical-tectonic-plates-straight-talk

Cevik S. Long Live Globalization: Geopolitical Shocks and International Trade. IMF Working Paper. 2023. URL: https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WP/Issues/2023/10/27/Long-Live-Globalization-Geopolitical-Shocks-and-International-Trade-540832

Qiu H., Shin H. S. & Zhang L. Mapping the realignment of global value chains. 2023. BIS Buletin 78. URL: https://www.bis.org/publ/bisbull78.pdf

Sekkel J. Summary of Major Trade Preference Programs. Washington, DC: Center for Global Development. 2009. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/266568478_Summary_of_Major_Trade_Preference_Programs

Fuchs A., Klann N.-H. Paying a visit: The Dalai Lama effect on international trade. Journal of International Economics. 2013. Vol. 91(1). Р. 164–177.

Crozet M., Hinz J. Friendly fire: The trade impact of the Russia sanctions and countersanctions. Economic Policy 2020. Vol. 35(101). P. 97-146.

Michaels G., Zhi X. Freedom fries. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics. 2010. Vol. 2. Is. 3. P. 256–281.

Heilmann K. Does political conflict hurt trade? Evidence from consumer boycotts. Journal of International Economics. 2016. Vol. 99. Is. C. P.179–191.

Dajud U. Political proximity and international trade. Economics & Politics. 2013. Vol. 25. Is. 3. P. 283-312.

Mityakov S., Tang H. & Tsui K. K. International politics and import diversification. Journal of Law and Economics. 2013. Vol. 56. Is. 4. P. 1091–1121.

IMF's Gopinath says economic fragmentation could cut global GDP by 7%. Reuters. 2023. URL: https://www.reuters.com/markets/imfs-gopinath-warns-fragmentation-global-economy-could-cut-gdp-by-7-2023-12-11/

Developing Economies in the 21st Century: A First-Quarter Report Card.

Global Economic Prospects. 2024. URL: https://www.worldbank.org/en/publication/global-economic-prospects

Armstrong M. How the World Economy is Expected to Grow. 2023. URL: https://www.statista.com/chart/30490/imf-real-gdp-growth-estimates-projections-by-region/

Published

2025-03-28