FEATURES OF THE USE OF SPECIAL SOFTWARE FOR DETERMINING PROSECUTORS IN LITERARY WORKS FOR JUDICIAL EXPERTISE AND EXPERT STUDIES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32689/2617-9660-2019-3-1-66-73Keywords:
borrowing, literary works, plagiarism, software and hardware complexes, conclusion of a judicial expert.Abstract
The current state of scientific and technological progress, the ease of access to created and saved texts, actively disseminating them through the Internet, actively contributes to the process of creating texts based on already existing, unlawful borrowing as fragments of the text, and whole texts without changes and transformations, the use of which is not justified for any purpose. All this contributes to the increased need for research, the purpose of which is to seek and establish such borrowings. Given the high complexity of conducting a search for borrowing one work in another, there is an urgent need to automate this process. To date, there are already quite a large number of services that position themselves as «qualitative and reliable means of detecting plagiarism in any product», higher education institutions also have either internal software development for such a search, or use purchased software. Unfortunately, no specialized software for detecting borrowings (signs of plagiarism) has yet been developed, which can be used precisely when conducting expert assessments and expert research on literary works, nor does it specify the specifics of its use. In this article the peculiarities of the use of specialized software for detecting borrowings (signs of plagiarism) are considered in the course of expert examinations and expert researches of literary works, in particular, scientific character. The basic research methods are considered, which require the use of specialized software hardware and software for the detection of borrowings in the works. A general algorithm for the use of such software for the needs of forensic expertise is developed.
References
Про затвердження Інструкції про призначення та проведення судових експертиз та експертних досліджень та Науково-методичних рекомендацій з питань підготовки та призначення судових експертиз та експертних досліджень. Наказ Міністерства юстиції України № 53/5 від 08.10.1998 р.– Редакція від 22.02.2019.– URL:https://zakon. rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0705-98
Шляхов А.Р. Общие положения методики криминалистической экспертизы : метод. пособие для экспертов / А.Р. Шляхов. – М. : ВНИ- ИСЭ, 1961.
Мельников В. Толкование судами понятия «оригинальное произведение» / В. Мельников // Интеллектуальная собственность. Авторское правo и смежные права. – 2008. – №9. – С. 46-53.
Ионас В. Я. Произведения творчества в гражданском праве / В.Я. Ионас. – М.: Изд. «Юрид. литература», 1972. – 168 с.
Гаврилов Э.П. Оригинальность как критерий охраны объектов авторским правом / Є.П. Гаврилов // Патенты и лицензии. – 2004. – №6. – С. 45-51.