THE ROLE AND FEATURES OF PUBLIC POLICY FOR SETTLEMENT OF SOCIAL CONFLICTS

Authors

  • Roman STADNIICHUK

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32689/2523-4625-2022-6(66)-9

Keywords:

role, public policy, democratic governance, social conflicts

Abstract

The article examines public policy and social conflict. The study found that early shared understanding of the risks of conflict is central to prevention. But understanding the risks is not enough; it is important that participants are prepared to adjust policies and programming to address these risks. This requires the creation of platforms at the country or regional level that allow open discussion with all stakeholders about the types of policies and programs that are needed at the first sign of risk, not when violence has already begun and in an acute crisis. It also requires careful management of the impact of economic and social shocks (such as rapid changes in food or energy prices), rising inflationary pressures, etc. When societies are fragmented and polarized, these consequences need to be managed especially well, and sometimes more time and money are needed to implement certain reforms needed to stabilize the economy. Development actors need to be much more aware of the impact of economic and social policies on peacebuilding and security. So far, the participants in development and peacebuilding – at the national, regional, or international levels – are not sufficiently interacting. Development has particularly important implications for security, first because insecurity largely undermines development efforts, and because development interventions can often contribute much more to local security than policing alone. However, this requires that actors—both from the security and development sides—understand each other and engage in constructive cooperation. Finally, the roles of humanitarian and development actors are complementary, especially in terms of prevention, and additional efforts are needed to make the nexus between humanitarian and development a reality.

References

Гречко Т. К. Публічне управління в забезпеченні сталого (збалансованого) розвитку : навч. посіб. / Т. К. Гречко, С. А. Лісовський, С. А. Романюк, Л. Г. Руденко. Херсон : Грінь Д.С., 2015. 264 с

Концептуальні засади взаємодії політики й управління : навч. посіб. / авт. кол. : Е. А. Афонін, Я. В. Бережний, О. Л. Валевський та ін. ; за заг. ред. В. А. Ребкала, В. А. Шахова, В. В. Голубь, В. М. Козакова. К. : НАДУ, 2010. 300 с.

Clark, David. 2002. “Neoliberalism and Public Service Reform: Canada in Comparative Perspective.” Canadian Journal of Political Science, 35(4): 771–793.

Dufour, Pascale, and Marcos Ancelovici. 2018. “From Citizenship Regimes to Protest Regimes?,” in M. Paquet, N. Nagels and A.-C. Fourot (eds). Citizenship as a Regime: Canadian and International Perspectives. Montreal : McGill-Queen’s University Press. P. 165–185.

Furlong, Kathryn. 2010. “Neoliberal water management? Trends, limitations, reformulations.” Environment and Society: Advances in Research. 1: 46–75

Giugni, Marco and Maria Grasso. 2015. Austerity and Protest Popular Contention in Times of Economic Crisis. New York/London: Routledge. Hacker, Jacob S. 2004. “Privatizing Risk without Privatizing the Welfare State: The Hidden Politics of Social Policy Retrenchment in the United States.” American Political Science Review, 98(2): 243–260.

Herrera, Veronica and Alison E. Post. 2014. “Can Developing Countries Both Decentralize and Depo- liticize Urban Water Services? Evaluating the Legacy of the 1990s Reform Wave.” World Development. 64 (December): 621–641.

Lee Mudge, Stephanie. 2008. “What is Neo-liberalism?” Socio-Economic Review .6(4): 703–731.

Lorenz, Chris. 2012. “If You’re So Smart, Why Are You under Surveillance? Universities, Neoliberalism, and New Public Management.” Critical Inquiry. 38 (Spring): 599–629.

Mahoney, James and Kathleen Thelen. 2010. “A Theory of Gradual Institutional Change.” In Explain- ing Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency, and Power, eds. James Mahoney and Kathleen Thelen, New York / Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.

McCarthy, John D. and Mayer N. Zald. 1977. “Resource Mobilization and Social Movements: A Partial Theory.” American Journal of Sociology. 82(6): 1212–41.

Murillo, Maria Victoria. 2009. Political Competition, Partisanship, and Policy Making in Latin Ameri- can Public Utilities. New York : Cambridge University Press.

Pierson, Paul. 1994. Dismantling the Welfare State? Reagan, Thatcher, and the Politics of Retrench- ment. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.

Pierson, Paul. 2000. “The Limits of Design: Explaining Institutional Origins and Change.” Governance. 13(4): 475–99.

Streeck, Wolfgang and Kathleen Thelen. 2005. “Introduction: Institutional Change in Advanced Politi- cal Economies.” In Beyond Continuity. Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies, eds. Streeck, Wolfgang and Kathleen Thelen. Oxford : Oxford University Press.

Published

2023-05-01

How to Cite

СТАДНІЙЧУК, Р. (2023). THE ROLE AND FEATURES OF PUBLIC POLICY FOR SETTLEMENT OF SOCIAL CONFLICTS. Scientific Works of Interregional Academy of Personnel Management. Political Sciences and Public Management, (6(66), 70-73. https://doi.org/10.32689/2523-4625-2022-6(66)-9