PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION OF HIGHER EDUCATION IN THE USA THROUGH THE PRISM OF ACCREDITATION

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32689/2618-0065-2022-1(11)-28-41

Keywords:

public administration, public administration of higher education, management of higher education, public administration of higher education in the USA, higher education, accreditation.

Abstract

Abstract. The purpose of this article is to analyze the public administration of higher education in the United States through the prism of the accreditation process. The development of modern society encourages higher education to be a priority in the national development strategy, as its activities are aimed at training specialists in a new format, so the issue of higher education management remains relevant, and the accreditation process confirms the quality of university training and harmonization of national education systems. . The basis of the research goal is the use of such methods as logical, analysis (analyzed the basic principles of the accreditation process in the US), synthesis (identified practical and applied aspects of public administration in higher education for quality assurance), generalization (identified features of public administration in US higher education in the context of accreditation). It is determined that the role of the US Department of Education in the process of university accreditation is to oversee accreditation documents issued by federal authorities, be responsible for accreditation agencies, guarantee compliance with accreditation standards, and periodically publish a list of national accreditation agencies. The main accreditation measures are stated: standards; independent study; on-site assessment; decisions and promulgation; monitoring; revaluation. The main approaches to improving accreditation policy have been identified, namely: increasing compliance as a standard; restoration of regulatory coordination; increase academic and career mobility; providing innovative educational practice; protection of institutional autonomy; evaluation of general indicators; optimization of accreditor recognition processes; encouraging accreditors to support innovative practices. Based on the analysis of United States experience in public administration of higher education in the context of accreditation, the following proposals can be formulated to improve such activities in Ukraine: in the development and evaluation of educational programs accreditation should be carried out by independent accreditation agencies public administration bodies should focus on the development of state policy in the field of higher education, permanent control over its implementation, and control over accreditation agencies; using the experience of the United States, to improve the mechanism, procedure and procedure for accreditation of educational programs. Among the promising areas of research on public administration of higher education in the United States should be noted the Department of e-learning and the development of virtual educational resources. 

References

Механізми оцінювання якості вищої освіти в умовах євроінтеграції : монографія / О. Воробйова, М. Дебич, В. Луговий [та ін.]; за ред. В. Лугового, Ж. Таланової. URL : https://doi.org/10.31874/978-617-7486-38-0- 2020 (дата звернення 06.11.2021).

Теоретичні основи політики та механізмів забезпечення ефективності освітньої діяльності в університетах у контексті євроінтеграції: препринт (аналітичні матеріали) / О. Базелюк, Ю. Вітренко, О. Воробйова [та ін.]; за ред. Ж. Таланової. URL : https://doi.org/10.31874/978-617-7644-54-4-2021 (дата звернення 05.11.2021).

Оцінювання якості вищої освіти в умовах євроінтеграції: методичні рекомендації / О. Воробйова, М. Дебич, В. Луговий [та ін.]. URL : https://ihed.org.ua/wp- content/uploads/2021/02/ocinka_yakosti_VO_v_umovah_evrointegrac_analit_I VO-2020-125p_avtors-kolektiv.pdf (дата звернення 11.11.2021).

Lugovyi V., Slyusarenko O., Talanova, Zh. Challenge of developing quality profile of higher education in Ukraine. Education: Modern Discourses. 2020. № 3. P. 57–77. URL : https://doi.org/10.37472/2617-3107-2020-3-06 (дата звернення 12.01.2022).

Луговий В. І. Проблема освітньої якості в стратегії розвитку вищої освіти 2 в Україні. Вісник Національної академії педагогічних наук України. 2020. (2). URL : https://doi.org/10.37472/2707-305X-2020-2-2-11-1 (дата звернення 05.11.2021).

Аналіз провідного вітчизняного та зарубіжного досвіду щодо оцінювання якості вищої освіти в умовах євроінтеграції : аналітичні матеріали у двох частинах / О. Воробйова, М. Дебич, І. Линьова [та ін.]; за ред. В. Лугового, Ж. Таланової. Київ : Прінтеко, 2020. 317 с. URL : https://ihed.org.ua/wp- content/uploads/2021/03/Analiz_ocinki_VO_v_umovah_internac_ch1- 2_analit_IVO-2020-317p_avtors-kolektiv.pdf (дата звернення 20.11.2021).

Болонський процес в Україні 2005–2020: досягнення, виклики та перспективи : огляд. Київ, 2020. 34 с. URL : https://erasmusplus.org.ua/images/phocadownload/BolognaStudy_Ukraine200 5_2020_NEO_ukr.pdf (дата звернення 05.11.2021).

Doorwar V., Meraj Q. F., Hassan M. Impact of Public Administration and Its Role in Higher Education. Proceedings of 10th International Conference on Digital Strategies for Organizational Success. 2019. URL : https://ssrn.com/abstract=3308681 (дата звернення 20.01.2022).

Hintea C. E. Four elements of successful reform. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration. 2020. № 42 (1). P. 9–11. URL : https://doi.org/10.1080/23276665.2020.1741864 (дата звернення 20.01. 2022).

Braga A. Is public administration struggling in higher education? Evidence from the United States scenario. Teaching Public Administration. 2020. № 38 (3). P. 284–294. URL : https://doi.org/10.1177/0144739420908306 (дата звернення 20.01.2022).

Hodges D. Z. Integrity is the heart of the accreditation process. The Reflective Leader. 2022. № 23 (6). P. 6–7. URL : https://doi.org/10.1002/dap.30990 (дата звернення 21.01.2022).

Shellenbarger T. Making choices with accreditation decisions. Teaching and Learning in Nursing. 2022. № 17 (1). P. 5–6. URL : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2021.11.009 (дата звернення 21.01.2022).

Advances in Research, Theory and Practice in Work-Integrated Learning. Enhancing Employability for a Sustainable Future / ed. by Ferns S. J., Rowe A. D., Zegwaard K. E. London : Routledge, 2021. 298 p. URL : https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003021049 (дата звернення 21.01.2022).

Ervin S. M. Program Evaluation and Accreditation. Keating’s Curriculum Development and Evaluation in Nursing Education / ed. by S. S. DeBoor. 2021. URL : https://doi.org/10.1891/9780826186867.0014 (дата звернення 20.01.2022).

Badhwar R. Certification & Accreditation. The CISO’s Transformation. Springer, Cham, 2021. URL : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81412-0_22 (дата звернення 20.01.2022).

Accreditation in the United States. URL : https://www2.ed.gov/admins/finaid/accred/accreditation_pg2.html (дата звернення 04.11.2021).

National Advisory Committee on Institutional Quality and Integrity (NACIQ). URL : https://sites.ed.gov/naciqi/ (дата звернення 04.11.2021).

National Recognition of State Approval Agencies by the U.S. Secretary of Education. URL : https://www2.ed.gov/admins/finaid/accred/accreditation_pg6.html#RegionalIn stitutional (дата звернення 04.11.2021).

Criteria for the Recognition of State Agencies for Vocational Education. URL : https://www2.ed.gov/admins/finaid/accred/accreditation_pg7.html#NationalIns titutional (дата звернення 04.11.2021).

Keiser A. E. Report to the U.S. Secretary of Education: 2018 Accreditation Policy Recommendations on Regulatory Reform. URL : https://sites.ed.gov/naciqi/files/2018/02/Regulatory-Reform- Recommendations-FINAL.pdf (дата звернення 05.11.2021).

Published

2022-03-29