THE FRCHETYPES OF CULTURE AND SUBCULTURE AS THE DETERMINANTS OF SOCIAL ACTIONS AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32689/2617-2224-2020-1(21)-301-311

Keywords:

culture, subculture, archetypes of culture and subculture, global culture, multiculturalism, transculturalism, intercultural communication, cultural capital, subcultural capital, subcultural lifestyle, social management

Abstract

The conceptual argumentation that the processes of the cultural globalization are important stimuli for development of scientific studies of the contemporary culture and its functional and technological peculiarities is presented in the article. It is underlined that the cultural development of the human civilization has always been stimulated by the influence оf different subcultures. Therefore the specialized scientific investigations, which are oriented to the substantiation of the archetypal status of culture and subculture as the determinative factors of social actions and social management today, are very important. It is proved that active use of such concepts as “global culture”, “multiculturalism”, “transculturalism”, “intercultural communication”, “cultural capital”, “subcultural capital”, “subcultural lifestyle” by scholars now is the positive factor for the creation of scientific programs for analysis of the ontological specifics of the archetypes of culture and subculture in the context of globalization, virtualization and individualization of social life. Attention is paid to the contradictions of the conflict interpretation of subculture as the culture of social minority” that is caused by such social phenomena as social alienation, marginalization and poverty. The author defines the archetype of subculture as the multifunctional social phenomenon that emerges and reproduces itself in society as the attributive consequence of the cultural differentiation. It is argued that the significant innovative problem of the social management is the elaboration of the effective technologies for social control over different forms of activities of subcultural groups that emerge as critical human attitudes to the existing social order and as the creative values of the progressive social constructivism.

References

Culture // Abercombie N., Hill St, Turner Br. The Pinguine Dictionary of Sociology. – Third ed. London: Pinguine books Ltd., 1994. P. 99.

Lewis J. From Culturalism to Traansculturalism // Iowa Journal of Cultural Studies., 2002. N1 ( spring). P. 14–32.

Sorrels K. Intercultural communication, Globalization and Social Justice / Katryn Sorrels. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage publ., 2013. 290 p.

Kammeyer K., Ritzer G., Yetman N. Sociology: experiencing changing societies. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 1997. 650 p.

Kelhoun Cr., Light D., Keller S. Sociology. 6th ed. New York: Mc Graw Hill, 1994. 651 p.

Бехманн Г. Современное общество: общество риска, информационное общество, общество знаний / Готт- хард Бехманн; пер. c нем. А. Ю. Анто- кольского, Г. В. Гороховой, Д. В. Еф- ременко, В. В. Каганчук, С. В. Месяц. 2-е изд., М.: Логос, 2012. 248 с.

Williams P. Subcultural Theory. Traditions and Concepts. Cambrige: Polity Press, 2011. 224 p.

Haenfler R. Subcultures: The basics. – New York: Routlege, 2014. 192 p.

Thornton S. The Sociologic of Subcultural Capital // The Subcultures Reader / K.Geldner and S.Thornton (eds). L.- N.Y: Routlege, 1997. P. 200–212.

Hebdige D. Subculture: The Meaning of Style (new accents). L.: Routlege, 2002. 286 p.

Lapina V. V. The archetype of consumption and its contradictions in the contemporary Еuropean space of economic and social interactions / V. V. Lapina // Public management : collection. № 4 (14). June 2018. Kyiv: ДП “Видавничий дім “Персонал”, (Special edition). Р. 159–170.

Sub/культуры: протест, коммуни- кация или обретение себя? Херсон: ФЛП Грань Д.С., 2016. 239 с.

Соціальна напруженість в регіональних вимірах: проблеми теорії, методології та методики соціоло- гічного дослідження: Монографія / В. І. Судаков, Є. В. Сірий, В. В Лапіна та ін.; за заг. В. І. Судакова. К.: Логос, 2018. 197 с.

Cубкультурна віріативність україн- ського соціуму / за ред. Н. Костенко, А. Ручки. К.: Ін-т соціології НАН України, 2010. 288 c.

Шульга М. Збій соціальної матриці: монографія / Микола Шульга. К.: Ін-т соціології НАН України, 2018. 284 c.

Published

2020-05-29

How to Cite

Судаков, В. (2020). THE FRCHETYPES OF CULTURE AND SUBCULTURE AS THE DETERMINANTS OF SOCIAL ACTIONS AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT. Public Management, (1 (21), 301-311. https://doi.org/10.32689/2617-2224-2020-1(21)-301-311

Issue

Section

Статті