AN ARCHETYPAL FOUNDATION OF THE CULTURE OF MAKING MANAGERIAL DECISION

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32689/2617-2224-2019-18-3-301-312

Keywords:

decision-making, culture, thinking, archetype, public governing, system, environment, equilibrium, effectiveness

Abstract

Governing of different systems such as countries, regions, and organizations is a complex process that requires a comprehensive approach to decision- making (DM). A dynamic environment complicates DM because of big data, delay in DM, human features, unpredictability of second and third order effects, and other reasons. To deal with the problem of governing in this environment requires applying of a special DM approach.

This approach has to help to visualize, analyze and understand the system, the environment, and their mutual influences. Different philosophies of thinking can create so called DM cultures that are distinguishable, effective, and fundamental. A nature of a DM culture can have an archetypal foundation because it has been formed for centuries and remain relatively stable in time. A DM culture provides comprehensive approach to problem-solving based on a certain unconscious visualization of the desired future and deep understanding of the problem in the given environment.

For public governing it is possible to use DM cultures in order to understand different parts of the system and solve complex problems properly. A DM culture can take in account all elements of the system, the environment, their mutual influence and dynamic of change. Applying of a DM culture can improve sensitiveness and “Emotional Intelligence” of the system. Archetypal foundation of a DM culture provides universal, balanced approach to understand and solve problems and facilitates effective governing. Difficulties to analyze a big data in contemporary environment complicate the decision making process (DMP) and forces making mistakes. The DM culture, as an archetype, encompasses all possible effects in analysis because it is already rooted in the DM framework. This quality can provide effective governing in the changeable and dynamic environment and facilitate better understanding of the competitors. Also, it can facilitate determining a level of delegation of power between the state authority and the civil society for better DMP in given conditions.

References

Dake K. (1991). Orienting dispositions in the perception of risk: An analysis of Contemporary worldviews and cultural biases. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 22, p. 61–82.

Hofstede G. (1984). Culture’s Consequences. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

Triandis C. Harry. (2006). Cultural Intelligence in Organizations. “Group and Organizational Management,” Vol. 31, p. 20–26. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/247738378_Cultural_Intelligence_in_Organizations

Yates J. F. & Lee J. W. (1996). Chinese decision making. In M. H. Bond (Ed.), Handbook of Chinese Psychology, Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.

Kahneman Daniel (2003). A Perspective on Judgment and Choice. Mapping Bounded Rationality. American Psychologist. Vol. 58. № 9, p. 697–720.

Sun Tzu. The Art of War. Translated by Lionel Giles in 1910. Published in 2000. Allandale Online Publishing: Leicester LE2 1WS, England. 7. Kautilya. Arthashastra. Translated by R. Shamasastry in 1915. Bangalore: Government Press. https://www.google.com.ua/search?ei=yOugXMqRDqnorgTIspL4DQ&q=the+arthashastra+of+kautilya&oq=the+Arthas%D0%B1stra+of+&gs_l=psy-ab.1.1.0i19l2.131455.131455..134851...0.0..0.111.111.0j1......0....2j1..gws-wiz.evaHPA8JbRk

Clausewitz Carl Von. On war, ed. Michael Howard and Peter Paret (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1989).

Musashi Miyamoto. A book of five rings. Trans. Victor Harris (New York: The Overlook Press, 1974).

Naplyokov Yuriy (2017). NATO Operational Planning process. Kyiv: NDU.

Jung Carl G. (1969) Aion: Researches into the phenomenology of the Self. Vol. 9.2 of the Collected works of C. Jung. Trans. R.F.C. Hull. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Jung Carl G. (1971). Psychological Types. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

Рубинштейн С. Л. (2002). Основы общей психологии (1940). СПб.: Питер.

Strohschneider S. (2002). Cultural Factors in Complex Decision Making. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 4 (1). hps://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1030

Bloom Benjamin S. (1956). Taxomony of educational objectives. Longmans: Edwards Bros. Michigan.

Braun William (2002). “The system Archetypes.” Retrieved from: https://www.google.com.ua/#q=The+Syste m+Archetypes+by+william+braun&* &spf=1

Published

2019-05-29

How to Cite

Напльоков, Ю. (2019). AN ARCHETYPAL FOUNDATION OF THE CULTURE OF MAKING MANAGERIAL DECISION. Public Management, (3 (18), 301-312. https://doi.org/10.32689/2617-2224-2019-18-3-301-312

Issue

Section

Статті