METHODOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF INTERCONNECTION BETWEEN INSTITUTIONALISM AND ARCHETYPES IN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATI ON
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32689/2617-2224-2021-1(26)-17-29Keywords:
institutionalism, archetypes, modernization, public administrationAbstract
The current trends in society as a whole and in public administration under the influence of institutional factors and archetypes are identified. The course of modernization and postmodernization processes is clarified, and the evolution of scientific approaches is analyzed. It is proposed to consider postmodernization as a process ensuring evolutionary transformation from traditional to postmodern society, which is due to existing archetypes and fits into the context of institutionalism that determines the need for qualitative transformations in modern society. The influence of institutionalism on social processes in relation to social archetypes is studied: institutions are united by the fact that they arose as a result of society development and embody traditions and customs, standards of behavior and prevailing ways of people’s thoughts, that is, archetypal elements. The institutions are determined in their multidimensional nature, and therefore the archetypes by their varieties are presented. It is argued that institutionalism is the scientific basis of public administration. The features of state governance and public administration are clarified and a conclusion is made on the need for social transformations to support public administration. It is determined that there are several models of interaction and social segments that create grounds for solidary and civil society, consortia, convictions and legal social state. It is noted that public administration model is based on the human model, and it is found that human behavior is based on habits and principles of behavior that have an archetypal nature and are defined as institutions. The interconnection between institutionalism and archetypes in public administration creates grounds for its effectiveness and allows considering it as a tool for society development that is able to ensure a dialogue between government, business and citizens.
References
Bell D. (1973). The coming of postindustrial society: A venture of social forecasting. N.Y.: Basic Books.
Berlie Jean A., ed. Islam in China, Hui and Uyghurs: between modernization and sinicization (Bangkok, White Lotus Press, 2004)
Blokland Hans, and Nancy Smyth Van Weesep, eds (2006). Modernization and Its Political Consequences: Weber, Mannheim, and Schumpeter.
Chin Carol C. (2011). Modernity and National Identity in the United States and East Asia, 1895–1919 (Kent State University Press; 160.
Афонін Е. Архетипіка і публічне управління: стратегії сталого розвитку в умовах цивілізаційних зрушень / Е. Афонін, Т. Плахтій //Український соціум. 2019. № 2 (69). С. 142–151.
Schumpeter J. A Theory of Economic Development (Social Science Classics Series Book 46) [Print Replica] Kindle Edition by Joseph A Schumpeter (Author) Format: Kindle Edition. 320 p.
Міжнародна економіка: світова економіка та міжнародні економічні відносини. Модуль 1. Світова система господарювання: навч.-практ. посібник. К.: “Вид. дім “Професіонал”, 2008. 386 с.
Амосов О. Ю. Науковий досвід О. Г. Лібермана та капіталізація знань: сучасні реалії / О. Ю. Амосов, Н. Л. Гавкалова, Н. С. Маркова // Ліберманівські читання – 2009. Економічна спадщина та сучасні проблеми. Монографія / За заг. ред. В. С. Пономаренка, М. О. Кизима, О. Г. Зими. Харків : ФОП Лібуркіна Л. М.; ВД “ІНЖЕК”, 2009. 296 с.
Амосов О. Ю., Гавкалова Н. Л. Модернізація в Україні: шлях в майбутнє // Стратегія розвитку України. Економіка, соціологія, право. Вип. 4. Т. 1. 2012. С. 16–21.
Вехи экономической мысли. Т. 6. Международная экономика / Под общ. ред. А. Киреева. М.: ТЕИС, 2006. 720 с.
Гонтарева І. В. Оцінювання системної ефективності функціонування і розвитку промислових підприємств: монографія. Харків: ВД “ІНЖЕК”, 2011. 480 с.
Blaug M. (1997). Economic theory in retrospect (5th ed.). Cambridge New York: Cambridge University Press.
Thorstein Veblen. The Theory of the Leisure Class // Social Stratification. Class, Race, and Gender in Sociological Perspective, 3rd edit., Ed.by David B. Grusky, Westview Press. Р. 862–870.
Енциклопедичний словник з державного управління / уклад. : Ю. П. Сурмін, В. Д. Бакуменко, А. М. Михненко та ін. ; за ред. Ю. В. Ковбасюка, В. П. Трощинського, Ю. П. Сурміна. К. : НАДУ, 2010. 820 с.
