SOCIO-POLITICAL MYTH: MYTHS MAKING AND MYTH CREATIVITY IN THE PRISM OF MODERN COMMUNICATE PRACTICES

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32689/2617-2224-2021-1(26)-71-84

Keywords:

socio-political myth, myth making, myth creativity, modern communicative practices, public management

Abstract

The analysis of myth within the political science of the humanities does not contain precise guidelines for solving current problems of rethinking the role of myth in the transit society, highlighting the possibilities of using the mobilizing potential of myth in achieving positive social changes. Therefore, the need to outline a new understanding of the phenomenology of modern myth, conceptualization of the problem field of political myth as a factor in forming new qualities of political consciousness of Ukrainian society, clarifying the content, efficiency, morality, instrumentality of mythmaking in a transformational society determines the relevance of the research topic. The dynamics of socio-cultural change at the present stage raises new problems associated with the crisis in the political sphere, exacerbated by the virtualization of social relations. Social myth-making is an integral part of public life, and election campaigns are the clearest example of it. Consciousness of the transformational stage of development of Ukrainian society is a favourable basis for change, but it is particularly inclined to manipulation. Mythology in society can be an excuse, a pretext to assert one’s inaction. In a crisis society, given the low legitimacy of power, the technological role of artificial political myths in the aspect of manipulation of public consciousness is fully revealed. Thus, the figurative language of political communication constructs a sacred political reality by modeling the idea of it, constituted in the form of significant constructive facts, relevant to the Ukrainian political culture ‘mythotext’, which the collective personality reads. Therefore, communication through myth is a model of one-way political communication. Socio-political myth effectively structures the vision of the present and the future, but complicates conscious political choices.

References

Барт Р. Избранные работы: Семиотика. Поэтика. М.: Прогресс, 1989. 615 с.

Деррида Ж. Позиции. К.: Д. Л., 1996. 192 с.

Durand Gilbert. Les Structures anthropologiques de l’imaginaire. Paris: Dunod, 2016. 560 p.

Маничев С. Мифология в политических технологиях // Общество и политика. СПб.: Изд-во СПб. ун-та, 2000. 512 с.

Шиллер Г. Манипуляторы сознанием. М.: Мысль, 1980. 325 с.

Голосовкер Я. Э. Логика мифа. М.: Наука, 1987. 218 с.

Харченко Л. Соціально-гносеологічна природа сучасної міфотворчості: автореф. дис. ... канд. філос. наук: 09.00.03 “Соціальна філософія та філософія історії” / Львівський нац. ун-т ім. Івана Франка. Л., 2004. 18 с.

Цуладзе А. Политическая мифология. М.: ЭКСМО: Алгоритм, 2003. 382 с.

Почепцов Г. Имидж от фараонов до президентов. К.: АДЕФ-Украина. 1997. 328 с.

Полянська В. Символічна політика як система політичних технологій : автореф. дис. ... канд. політ. наук: 23.00.02 “Політичні інститути та процеси”. Дніпропетровськ, 2004. 19 с.

Бредіс І. Пострадянський парадокс: демократія в Україні, автократія в Росії // Дзеркало тижня. 2008. № 8 (687).

Галь Б. Мифотворчество controlc error [Электронный ресурс]. Режим доступа: http://dialogs.org.ua/ru/project/page12809.html

Published

2021-07-19

How to Cite

Кузьменко, Г. О. (2021). SOCIO-POLITICAL MYTH: MYTHS MAKING AND MYTH CREATIVITY IN THE PRISM OF MODERN COMMUNICATE PRACTICES. Public Management, (1 (26), 71-84. https://doi.org/10.32689/2617-2224-2021-1(26)-71-84

Issue

Section

Статті