NATIONAL CONSOLIDATION AND INTEGRATION AS AN OBJECT OF PUBLIC GOVERNANCE IN UKRAINE: ARCHETYPICAL APPROACH

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32689/2617-2224-2021-1(26)-143-151

Keywords:

consolidation, integration, cosmopolitan, heterogeneous society, natural and social conditionality, metamodern, archetypal approach

Abstract

In observations, our attention was drawn to the essential meaning of the terms integration and consolidation to reflect the scale of the relevance of an integrated understanding of the nature of mankind as a society at every level of its life. A common marker of a consolidated and integrated community is to improve the quality of life of both individuals and the group as a whole. It is noted that relativism as a methodological principle of relativity is already becoming a sign not only of the physical — material (including social), but also internal — psychological world [1, p. 8], thus marking the spread among the subjects of the social world “cosmopolitan” life trends. The existing conditioned phenomenon of the archetype of human nature, as the existence of a certain filter matrix in perception, comprehension, decision-making algorithms and further actions, is an intangible but scientifically verified “veil” or “prism” through which, and due to which, “human carrier” archetype interacts with the surrounding natural and social environment. In the emerging era — metamodern, task for the human being is not to find the source or reasons for the formation of its archetypal identity, but to improve the ability to self-awareness of existing destructive-negative algorithms and personal activities, on physical, emotional and mental levels and the constant development of skills to creative-positive vector of personal self-expression. National integration and consolidation, as a phenomenon and ability, for a person who has passed the path of self-awareness and self-analysis with verification of himself as an entity according to its natural and social conditioning becomes a conscious and unconditional starting point in his life. Such tendencies of selfidentification will promote interpersonal harmonization, improvement of integration and consolidation processes.

References

Афонін Е., Мартинов А. Українське диво: від депресії до соціального оптимізму. Київ: Вид. дім “Києво-Могилянська академія”, 2019. 296 с. (Серія “Відкрита дослідницька концепція”. Вип. 18).

Московичи С. Машина, творящая богов: Пер. с фр. Москва: Центр психологии и психотерапии, 1998. 560 с.

Cоціально-психологічні чинники інтеграції українського соціуму / О. Г. Злобіна, М. О. Шульга, Л. Д. Бевзенко та ін.; за наук. ред. О. Г. Злобіної. Київ: Ін-т соціології НАН України, 2016. 276 с.

Оржель О. Консолідація українського суспільства на основі національної ідеї: перспективи й обмеження (з точки зору європейського досвіду) // Вісник Нац. академії державного управління при Президентові України. 2012. № 2. С. 28–38.

Дюркгейм Э. О разделении общественного труда. Москва : Канон, 1996. 432 с.

Published

2021-07-19

How to Cite

Москалик, М. М. (2021). NATIONAL CONSOLIDATION AND INTEGRATION AS AN OBJECT OF PUBLIC GOVERNANCE IN UKRAINE: ARCHETYPICAL APPROACH. Public Management, (1 (26), 143-151. https://doi.org/10.32689/2617-2224-2021-1(26)-143-151

Issue

Section

Статті