THEORETICAL JUSTIFICATION OF THE USE OF THE CONCEPT OF “SOFT POWER” IN PSYCHOLOGY

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32689/maup.psych.2025.2.2

Keywords:

leader, leadership, transformational leadership model, authentic leadership, servant leadership, concept of “soft power”

Abstract

This article aims to analyze the theoretical and methodological foundations of the use of the concept of “soft power” in psychology, in particular in the field of management. The author seeks to reveal the essence of this concept, the structure of “soft power” and its main components, which are manifested in management processes. As a result of the analysis of publications and works related to this issue, signs of the use of “soft power” in management and modern leadership styles were identified. At the same time, criteria and indicators of its use by women managers in the process of performing managerial duties were identified. The research methodology is based on conducting a theoretical analysis of research aimed at studying “soft power”, modern leadership and management styles. To achieve the set goal, a synthesis of ideas about the foundations and signs of the use of “soft power” to achieve set goals, as well as leadership and management models, was carried out. In order to compare the studied approach to achieving the desired result when interacting with other people with modern leadership styles, the method of comparative analysis was used. At the same time, the main criteria and indicators of the use of “soft power” in management are identified through the use of the method of systematization of ideas about the phenomena under study. The scientific novelty lies in the introduction of the concept of “soft power” from the fields of economics and international relations into psychological science. Also, for the first time, a comparative analysis of its methods with the main components of modern leadership styles, which include transformational, authentic and servant leadership, was carried out. The article first systematically describes the criteria for the use of “soft power” by managers. These results of theoretical research can serve as the basis for the development of practical tools aimed at forming the ability of managers to use «soft power» in the performance of their duties to improve the performance of organizations. Conclusions. Therefore, “soft power” can become a new effective approach to management, which will allow solving the current problems of ensuring the effective operation of organizations in times of crisis and instability by increasing the level of commitment of employees to work in them, as well as forming the desire to achieve the set goals through the attractiveness of the final results in the light of ensuring their own interests, and not only material rewards.

References

Alwali J., Alwali W. The relationship between emotional intelligence, transformational leadership, and performance: a test of the mediating role of job satisfaction. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 43(6), 2022. Pp. 928–952.

Decety J., Meyer M. From emotion resonance to empathic understanding: A social developmental neuroscience account. Development and Psychopathology. 2008. 20(4), Pp. 1053–1080.

Deci E., Olafsen A., Ryan R. Self-determination theory in work organizations: The state of a science. Annual review of organizational psychology and organizational behavior 4.1. 2017 Pp. 19–43.

Deci E., Ryan R. Self-determination theory. Handbook of theories of social psychology 1.20. 2012. Pp. 416–436.

Deng C., Gulseren D., Isola C., Grocutt K., Turner N. Transformational leadership effectiveness: an evidence-based primer. Human Resource Development International, 26(5), 2023. Pp. 627–641.

Frankl V. Man’s search for meaning. Simon and Schuster, 1985. 240 p.

Maslow A. H. Toward a psychology of being. Simon and Schuster, 2013. 181 p.

Maslow A. Motivation and personality. New York: Harper & Row, Publishers 1954. 394 p.

May R. Love and will. WW Norton & Company, 1969. 352 p.

May R., Yalom I. Existential psychotherapy. Thomson Brooks/Cole Publishing Co, 2005. 544 p.

Nye J. The Future of Power. Public Affairs: New York, 2011. 320 p.

Nye J. The Powers to Lead. Oxford University Press: Oxford, 2008. 248 p.

Preston S. D., de Waal F. B. Empathy: Its ultimate and proximate bases. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 2002. 25(1), Pp. 1–20. doi: 10.1017/s0140525x02000018.

Rodríguez‐Rivero R., Ortiz‐Marcos I., Ballesteros‐Sánchez L., Romero J. The opportunity to improve psychological competences of project managers in international businesses. Psychology & Marketing, 35(2), 2018. Pp. 150–159.

Rogers C. Client centered therapy (new ed). Hachette UK, 2012. 592 p.

Rogers C. On Becoming a Person. A therapist’s view of psychotherapy. Boston, 1961. 434 p.

Smith A. The theory of moral sentiments. A. Millar; London: 1790. 528 p.

Strugar Jelača M., Bjekić R., Berber N., Aleksić M., Slavić A., Marić S. Impact of managers’ emotional competencies on organizational performance. Sustainability, 14(14), 2022. Pp. 88–100.

Vallerand R., Pelletier L., Koestner R. Reflections on self-determination theory. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne 49.3. 2008. Pp. 257.

Vuving A. The Logic of Attraction: Outline of a Theory of Soft Power. 2019. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3637662 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3637662

Zhang Y., Guo Y., Zhang M., Xu S., Liu X., Newman A. Antecedents and outcomes of authentic leadership across culture: A meta-analytic review. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 39(4), 2022. Pp. 1399–1435.

Zogaj A., Mähner P. M., Tscheulin D. K. Similarity between Human Beings and Chatbots–The Effect of Self-Congruence on Consumer Satisfaction while considering the Mediating Role of Authenticity. In Künstliche Intelligenz im Dienstleistungsmanagement: Band 2: Einsatzfelder–Akzeptanz–Kundeninteraktionen. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. 2021. Pp. 427–443.

Published

2025-10-01

How to Cite

ВАСИЛИК, О. (2025). THEORETICAL JUSTIFICATION OF THE USE OF THE CONCEPT OF “SOFT POWER” IN PSYCHOLOGY. Scientific Works of Interregional Academy of Personnel Management. Psychology, (2 (67), 13-19. https://doi.org/10.32689/maup.psych.2025.2.2