EVOLUTION OF APPROACHES TO HUMAN CAPITAL MANAGEMENT IN THE INVESTMENT DIMENSION OF ENTERPRISE ACTIVITY

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32689/2523-4536/74-22

Keywords:

human capital, management, approaches, transformation of views, enterprise

Abstract

The article explores the evolution and development of approaches to human capital management (HCM) in enterprises under the conditions of digital transformation, labor market flexibilization, and growing socio-economic uncertainty. The relevance of revisiting traditional personnel management paradigms is substantiated, taking into account the increasing importance of intangible assets, intellectual capital, and employee adaptability in the knowledge economy. The study provides a comprehensive analysis of classical, modern, and post-industrial approaches to managing human capital, including functional, resource-based, strategic, behavioral, and value-oriented models. A particular emphasis is placed on the integrative approach to HCM, which combines elements of agile management, corporate culture development, digitalization of HR processes, and the implementation of ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) standards in corporate governance. This approach enables organizations to move beyond administrative command models and adopt a human-centric philosophy of management that prioritizes employee engagement, career path customization, internal motivation, and knowledge sharing. The paper identifies a number of key trends in contemporary HCM: the shift from rigid hierarchical structures to flexible team-based systems; the replacement of linear career models with networked, lifelong learning trajectories; the growing role of digital tools and AI in talent analytics; and the increasing significance of emotional intelligence and social responsibility in leadership models. Based on comparative analysis and systematization of theoretical and practical approaches, the author proposes a modernized model of human capital management that enhances the organization's capacity for sustainable development, innovation, and competitiveness. The findings of the study are of practical importance for enterprise managers, HR professionals, business consultants, and researchers working in the fields of organizational development, strategic management, and human resource economics. The proposed recommendations can serve as a basis for transforming HR policies toward long-term investment in human potential as a key driver of organizational success.

References

Bobko L. O., Mazyar A. V. Problems of corporate social responsibility in Ukraine. Efficient economy. 2019. Аvailable at: http://www.economy.nayka.com.ua/?op=1&z=7043

Bondaruk T. G., Bondaruk I. S. The economic nature of the organizational and economic mechanism of social responsibility of business. Scientific Bulletin of the National Academy of Statistics, Accounting and Auditing: 2020. Coll. Science, 57–64.

Yevtushenko V. A. Assessment of corporate social responsibility: methods, objects, indicators. Bulletin of NTU KhPI. 2013. Р. 53–63.

Kusyk N. L., Kovalevskaya A. V. Methodical approach to assessing the effectiveness of socially responsible activities of the enterprise. Problems of the economy. 2012. Р. 137–141.

Zateyshchikova О. О. Analysis of approaches to assessing corporate social responsibility. Bulletin of socio-economic research. 2014. Р. 189–194.

Novikova O. F., Deich M. E., Pankova, O. V. and others. Diagnosis of the state and prospects of social responsibility in Ukraine (expert assessments): monograph, 2013. 296 р..

Seliverstova L. S., Losovskaya N. V. Approaches to the formation of organizational and economic mechanism for managing corporate social responsibility. Economy and state. 2019. Р. 13–16.

Stanasyuk N. S., Pasinovich I. I., Murza V. M. Tendencies of development of corporate social responsibility and methodological aspects of its estimation. Modern questions of economy and law: coll. science. Kyiv: Kyiv National Medical University. 2020. 31–43.

Kayla O'Neill. 16 CSR Facts You Need To Know. 2020. Available at: https://www.globalgiving.org/learn/listicle/csr-facts-you-need-to-know 2020

Stobierski Tim. 15 eye-opening corporate social responsibility statistics, Harvard business school online. 2021. Available at: https://online.hbs.edu/blog/post/corporate-social-responsibility-statistics

Nafi Jannatun. Different Types of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). 2018. Available at: https://www.transparenthands.org/different-types-of-corporate-social-responsibility-csr/

Telford Nicola. A List Of Statistics That Demonstrate The Importance Of CSR. 2021. Available at: https://viewsforchange.com/list-statistics-demonstrate-importance-csr/

Pacific Oaks College publications. Breaking down the 4 types of corporate social responsibility. 2021. Available at: https://www.pacificoaks.edu/voices/business/breaking-down-the-4-types-of-corporate-social-responsibility/

Indeed Editorial Team. What Is Social Responsibility? Types and Examples. 2021. Available at: https://www.indeed.com/career-advice/career-development/social-responsibility

Бобко Л. О., Мазяр А. В. Проблеми корпоративної соціальної відповідальності в Україні. Ефективна економіка. 2019. № 5. URL: http://www.economy.nayka.com.ua/?op=1&z=7043

Бондарук Т. Г., Бондарук І. С. Економічна природа організаційно-економічного механізму соціальної відповідальності бізнесу. Науковий вісник Національної академії статистики, обліку та аудиту: зб. наук. пр. 2020. № 1–2. С. 57–64.

Євтушенко В. А. Оцінка корпоративної соціальної відповідальності: методи, об’єкти, показники. Вісник НТУ “ХПІ”. 2013. № 46 (1019). С. 53–63.

Кусик Н. Л., Ковалевська А. В. Методичний підхід до проведення оцінки ефективності соціально відповідальної діяльності підприємства. Проблеми економіки. 2013. № 3. С. 137–141.

Затейщикова О. О. Аналіз підходів до оцінки соціальної відповідальності бізнесу. Вісник соціально-економічних досліджень. 2014. № 2 (53). С. 189–194.

Новікова О. Ф., Дейч М. Є., Панькова О. В. та ін. Діагностика стану та перспектив розвитку соціальної відповідальності в Україні (експертні оцінки): монографія. Донецьк, 2012. 296 с.

Селіверстова Л. С., Лосовська Н. В. Підходи до формування організаційно-економічного механізму управління соціальною відповідальністю бізнесу. Економіка та держава. 2019. № 7. С. 13–16.

Станасюк Н. С., Пасінович І. І., Мурза В. М. Тенденції розвитку корпоративної соціальної відповідальності та методологічні аспекти її оцінювання. Сучасні питання економіки і права: зб. наук. праць. Київ : КиМУ. 2019. Вип. 2 (12). С. 31–43.

Kayla O'Neill. 16 CSR Facts You Need To Know. 2020. URL: https://www.globalgiving.org/learn/ listicle/csr-facts-you-need-to-know 2020

Stobierski Tim. 15 eye-opening corporate social responsibility statistics, Harvard business school online. 2021. URL: https://online.hbs.edu/blog/post/corporate-social-responsibility-statistics

Nafi Jannatun. Different Types of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). 2018. URL: https://www.transparenthands.org/different-types-of-corporate-social-responsibility-csr/

Telford Nicola. A List Of Statistics That Demonstrate The Importance Of CSR. 2021. URL: https://viewsforchange.com/list-statistics-demonstrate-importance-csr/

Pacific Oaks College publications. Breaking down the 4 types of corporate social responsibility. 2021. URL: https://www.pacificoaks.edu/voices/business/breaking-down-the-4-types-of-corporate-social-responsibility/

Indeed Editorial Team. What Is Social Responsibility? Types and Examples. 2021. URL: https://www.indeed.com/career-advice/career-development/social-responsibility

Downloads

Published

2024-05-21