IMPLEMENTATION OF THE MEDIATION INSTITUTE AS AN ALTERNATIVE METHOD OF PUBLIC REGULATION OF DISPUTE RESOLUTION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32689/2617-9660-2019-3(5)-247-254Keywords:
mediation, negotiations, alternative dispute resolution, state.Abstract
The article deals with the basics of state regulation of mediation. The purpose of the article is to review and streamline the established criteria in the doctrine of civil law directions and approaches to defining the concept of protection of civil rights and protected by law interests, highlighting their heterogeneous and common nature to develop a holistic view of how to understand the classification of the concept, and a vision of an optimal methodological framework for defining the concept of protection of civil rights and legitimate interests. The legal model of mediation as well as approaches to the construction of the structure of mediation and mediation processes are considered. Methodological principles of regulation of mediation and their implementation in the present are analyzed. Areas of application of mediation have been identified. Modeled mediation model. It has been established that in the modern period the provisions are widely recognized and it is proved that mediation is a process of joint settlement and resolution of conflicts. Its main components are certain tendencies of introduction of mediation in the world, corresponding to them laws and the principles connected with them. Implementation of mediation in accordance with the requirements of the developed laws and principles depends entirely on the conflicting parties. It is substantiated that the tendencies of development of mediation agreement are determined by the development and functioning of state regulation and social processes in society. But the main factor influencing the introduction of mediation is the state-legal system, which reflects all the phenomena occurring in the country and beyond.The concept of mediation in the legal doctrine and the main international legal acts is investigated. Its features and place among other types of dispute resolution are identified. The characteristic features of mediation, the practice of introducing a research method into the public sphere, as well as features of resolving alternative disputes in individual countries are considered. The necessity of legislative introduction of the Institute of Mediation in Ukraine was emphasized.
References
Поліщук М. Поняття медіації як альтернативного методу вирішення спорів / М. Поліщук // Держава і право. -2014. -№65. – С.134-139.
Rau A. Processes of disput solution. The role ofLawyers. Third edition / A.Rau, T. Sherman. – New York. – 2002. – P. 337.
Kovach K. Mediation. Principles and Practice.
Third edition / K. Kovach. – Saint Paul. -2004. –P.15
Riskin L. Dispute Resolution and Lawyers Thirdedition / L. Riskin, J. Westbrook, Ch. Guthrie, T. Heinsh, R. Reuben, J. Robbennolt. – Paint Paul. – 2006. – P. 191-192.
Типовой закон ЮНИСТРАЛ о посредничестве: Резолюция, принятая Генеральной Асамблеей [Електронний ресурс]. – Режим доступу :
http:mediators.ru/rus/about_ mediation|international_law|uncitral_ model_law.
Про затвердження Положення про надання безоплатної первинної правової допомоги в Адміністрації Державної служби спеціального зв’язку та захисту інформації України : Положення від 04.05.2016 р. №320.
Официальный сайт Центра медиации и права [Електронний ресурс]. . – Режим доступу:http://mediacia. сom/.
Australian Tax Office, Practice Statement Law Administation 2018/9,ConductofTax Office Litigation,para 19.
Act of June 2015 90 relating to mediation and procedure in civil disputes (TheDisputeAct), Section 7-1.
Дендорфер Р. Медиация в Германии: структура, особенности и современное состояние / Р. Дендорфер//Коммерческая медиация: теория и практика : сб.ст./под. ред. С. Загайновой, В.Аболонина. – М.: Инфо-ропик Медиа. – 2012. – С.1-27.
