COGNITIVE ASPECTS OF UX DESIGN IN ENSURING THE USABILITY OF WEB RESOURCES

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32689/maup.it.2025.3.12

Keywords:

user experience, cognitive flow, usability, web resources, design methodology, cognitive ergonomics, task efficiency, error reduction, motivational feedback

Abstract

Web resource usability today is largely defined by the extent to which cognitive mechanisms of human perception,memory, and decision-making are respected in design solutions. While traditional UX frameworks emphasize visual clarityand interaction efficiency, they rarely formalize cognitive aspects as measurable design checkpoints. This gap necessitates thedevelopment of new approaches that directly integrate cognitive ergonomics into digital environments.The aim of the article is to investigate the cognitive aspects of UX design as a foundation for ensuring the usability of web resources, with the aim of developing an authorial methodology that integrates psychological principles, design heuristics, and adaptive mechanisms.The scientific novelty of this paper introduces an authorial methodology called Cognitive Flow UX (CF-UX), conceivedas a structured system for embedding cognitive ergonomics into digital environments. The CF-UX model is based on fiveinterdependent dimensions – perception clarity, working memory load, decision latency, error anticipation, and motivational feedback – which together form a diagnostic matrix for identifying usability gaps. Unlike generic heuristic evaluations, the CF-UX approach operationalizes these dimensions into design interventions such as chunked navigation pathways, adaptive prompts, predictive error recovery modules, and reward-driven feedback loops.The conclusions show that the study introduced and validated the CF-UX methodology across e-learning, e-government,and e-commerce platforms, demonstrating measurable improvements: task completion time decreased by 22–35%, error frequency fell by up to 40%, and user satisfaction (SUS scores) increased by an average of 18 points. These results prove that webusability cannot be ensured solely through visual or technical optimization but requires alignment with cognitive mechanisms of perception, memory, and decision-making. The main contribution of this research is threefold: operationalizing cognitive science constructs into measurable design levers, offering a replicable evaluative framework for systematic usability optimization, and demonstrating applicability across diverse domains, ensuring cognitive sustainability, inclusivity, and long-term engagement.

References

Alao O. D., Ezihe A. P., Amanze R. C., Shade O. K., Adebayo A. O. User-centered/user experience Uc/Ux design thinking approach for designing a university information management system. Ingénierie des Systèmes d’Information. 2022. Vol. 27. No. 4. P. 577. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18280/isi.270407 (date of access: 20.09.2025).

Alshaheen R., Tang R. User experience and information architecture of selected national library websites: A comparative content inventory, heuristic evaluation, and usability investigation. Journal of Web Librarianship. 2022. Vol. 16. No. 1. P. 31–67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19322909.2022.2027318 (date of access: 20.09.2025).

Banuelos-Lozoya E., Gonzalez-Serna G., Gonzalez-Franco N., Fragoso-Diaz O., Castro-Sanchez N. A systematic review for cognitive state-based QoE/UX evaluation. Sensors. 2021. Vol. 21. No. 10. 3439. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/s21103439 (date of access: 20.09.2025).

Contreras-Somoza L. M., Irazoki E., Toribio-Guzmán J. M., de la Torre-Díez I., Diaz-Baquero A. A., Parra-Vidales E., ... & Franco-Martín M. Á. Usability and user experience of cognitive intervention technologies for elderly people with MCI or dementia: a systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology. 2021. Vol. 12. 636116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.636116 (date of access: 20.09.2025).

Khamaj A., Ali A. M. Adapting user experience with reinforcement learning: Personalizing interfaces based on user behavior analysis in real-time. Alexandria Engineering Journal. 2024. Vol. 95. P. 164–173. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.aej.2024.03.045 (date of access: 20.09.2025).

Lewis J. R., Sauro J. Usability and user experience: Design and evaluation. In: Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics. 2021. P. 972–1015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119636113.ch38 (date of access: 20.09.2025).

Li W., Zhou Y., Luo S., Dong Y. Design factors to improve the consistency and sustainable user experience of responsive interface design. Sustainability. 2022. Vol. 14. No. 15. 9131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159131 (date of access: 20.09.2025).

Moreno L., Alarcon R., Martínez P. Designing and evaluating a user interface for people with cognitive disabilities. Proceedings of the XXI International Conference on Human Computer Interaction. 2021. P. 1–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3471391.3471400 (date of access: 20.09.2025).

Moreno L., Petrie H., Martínez P., Alarcon R. Designing user interfaces for content simplification aimed at people with cognitive impairments. Universal Access in the Information Society. 2024. Vol. 23. No. 1. P. 99–117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-023-00986-z (date of access: 20.09.2025).

St. Amant K. Cognition, care, and usability: Applying cognitive concepts to user experience design in health and medical contexts. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication. 2021. Vol. 51. No. 4. P. 407–428. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0047281620981567 (date of access: 20.09.2025).

Țichindelean M., Țichindelean M. T., Cetină I., Orzan G. A comparative eye tracking study of usability–towards sustainable web design. Sustainability. 2021. Vol. 13. No. 18. 10415. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su131810415 (date of access: 20.09.2025).

Virvou M. Artificial Intelligence and User Experience in reciprocity: Contributions and state of the art. Intelligent Decision Technologies. 2023. Vol. 17. No. 1. P. 73–125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/IDT-230092 (date of access: 20.09.2025).

Vlasenko K. V., Lovianova I. V., Volkov S. V., Sitak I. V., Chumak O. O., Krasnoshchok A. V., ... & Semerikov S. O. UI/UX design of educational on-line courses. CTE Workshop Proceedings. 2022. Vol. 9. P. 184–199. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55056/cte.114 (date of access: 20.09.2025).

Zaina L. A., Sharp H., Barroca L. UX information in the daily work of an agile team: A distributed cognition analysis. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. 2021. Vol. 147. 102574. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2020.102574 (date of access: 20.09.2025).

Zheng J., Gresham M., Phillipson L., Hall D., Jeon Y. H., Brodaty H., Low L. F. Exploring the usability, user experience and usefulness of a supportive website for people with dementia and carers. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology. 2024. Vol. 19. No. 4. P. 1369–1381. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2023.2180546 (date of access: 20.09.2025).

Downloads

Published

2025-12-04

How to Cite

КУЦИН, С. (2025). COGNITIVE ASPECTS OF UX DESIGN IN ENSURING THE USABILITY OF WEB RESOURCES. Information Technology and Society, (3 (18), 88-93. https://doi.org/10.32689/maup.it.2025.3.12

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Obs.: This plugin requires at least one statistics/report plugin to be enabled. If your statistics plugins provide more than one metric then please also select a main metric on the admin's site settings page and/or on the journal manager's settings pages.