ARCHETYPE OF SOCIAL JUSTICE AND IDEOLOGICAL CONFRONTATION OF THE CONTEMPORATY MODELS OF SOCIAL POLICY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32689/2617-2224-2019-18-3-427-438Keywords:
social justice, archetype of social justice, social policy, technological models of social policy, ideological contradictions among the models of social policyAbstract
The analysis of the essential characteristics of the social justices archetype as the integrative transcultural basis of peaceful human coexistence and as the specific foundation of the conflict type that determinate reproduction of the different forms of ideological confrontations among of the protective, liberal and intersocietal (global) technological models of social policy in the contemporary class-stratified societies is presented in the article. Argued that the modern processes of economic, political and cultural globalization are the important factorsб which determinate the need to elaborate the new theory of social justices that should be the valid cognitive instruments for explanation the contradictions of the global social stratifications and of the global social inequalities among agrarian, industrial and postindustrial societies and also it should be the conceptual base for modernization of existing models of social policy. The author supports the scholars who try to use the new ideas of “distributive justice” in order to develop the specific social themes on justice under the contradictory context of the contemporary globalized intercultural relations and communications. Substantiated that the urgent research task is concretization cognitive content of the concept “social policy”. Proved that it is important to understand that under conditions of globalization the content of this concept includes the specific elements, which reflect the specific dimensions of the global, supranational and national character. It is concluded that the identification of the conceptual basis of the protective, liberal and intersocietal technological models of social policy one can regard as the scientific proven fact that these models have common intension to justification of the archetypal status of social justices. Emphasized that, as the instruments of social management, these models have strong populist orientation and manipulative influence and this circumstance is a factor that restricts their practical efficiency as the means for democratization the mechanisms of social control.
References
Rawls J. A Theory of Justice / John Rawls. — New York; Oxford univ. press, 1973. — 607 p.
Hayek F. A. Law, Legislation and Liberty. — Vol. II: The Mirage of Social Justice / Friedrich August. A. Hayek. — Chicago: The Univ. of Chicago press, 1976. — 210 p.
Walzer M. Spheres of Justice. A Defense of Pluralism and Equality / Michael Walzer. — New York: Basic books, 1983. — 345 p.
Nozick R. Anarchy, State and Utopia / Robert Nozick. — Padstone, Corwill: Blacwell Publ., 2003. — 367 p.
Theorizing of intercultural communication / W. Gudykunst (ed). — Thousand Oaks, California: Sage publ., 2005. — 480 p.
Afonin E. A., Martynov A. Y. Archetypes of the sociocultural conflicts: from modern to postmodern / A. E. Afonin, A. Y. Martynov // Public management. — 2017. — № 3 (8). — Р. 17–32.
Sorrels K. Intercultural communication, Globalization and Social Justice / Katryn Sorrels. — Thousand Oaks, California: Sage publ., 2013. — 290 p.
Lapina V. V. Over-conumption archetype globalization as a new source of social conflicts and social tension / V. Lapina // Public management. — 2017. — № 3 (8). — Р. 158 –166.
Sandel M. J. Liberals and Limitations of Social Justice. — 2-nd ed. / Michael Sandel. — Cambrige: Cambrige univ. press, 1998. — 234 p.
North D. C., Wallisd J. J., Waingast B. B. Violence and Social Orders. A conceptual framework for interpreting recorded human history / D. C. North, J. J. Wallisd, B. B. Waingast. — New York: Cambrige univ. press, 2013. — 320 p.
Dahrendorf R. The Modern Social Conflict. The Politics of Liberty // Ralf Dahrendorf. — Berkley and Los Angeles: Univ. of California press, 1990. — 219 p,
Beck U. World at Risk / Ulrich Beck. — London: SAGE Publ., 2009. — 226 p.
Habermas J. The Divided West / Jurgen Habermas. — Cambrige ; Polity press, 2006. — 224 p.
Esping-Andersen G. Two societies, one sociology and no theory / Gosta Esping- Andersen // The British Journal of Sociology. — Vol. 51, issue 1. — January/ March 2000. — Р. 58–78.
Social Policy: Theories, Concepts and Issues / ed. by M. Lavette, A. Prat — 3ed. — London. : Sage, 2006. — 325 p.
Deakon B. Stubbs P. Global social policy studies /Bob Deakon, Paul Stubbs. // Global social policy. — 2013. — № 1 (13). — Р. 5–23.
Kennett P. Comparative Social Policy: Theory and Research / Patricia Kennett. — Buckingham, Philadelphia: Open univ. press, 2001. — 189 p.
Archer M. The sociological approach to the tension between equality and social inequality / Margaret Archer. // The Study of the Tension between Human Equality and Social Inequalities. From the Perspectives of the Various Social Sciences. — Vatican city: Academy of Political Sciences, 1996. — Acta 1. — Р. 81–99.
Atkinson A. B. Social exclusion, Poverty and Unemployment / Anthony Atkinson. // Exclusion, Employment and Opportunity / A. B. Atkinson and J. Hills eds. — London: School of Economic and Political Science, 1998. — Р. 1–20.
