ARCHETYPE OF THE PLACE IN ARCHITECTONIC OF THE ENVIRONMENT OF PUBLIC POLICY

Abstract

The review of the concept of public policy environment in the modern public-management scientific discourse is actualized due to the lack of systematic and comprehensive studies on this problem.

The results of consideration of the state policy environment as a place through the application of the archetypal paradigm are presented.

The connection between archetypal ideas about the place and the modern course of state policy is also outlined and highlighted. The evaluation of the environment as a “place” is historically connected with the statement of the existence of a thing or phenomenon and lies in the plane of spatial terminology. The place, within the framework of the approach, is considered as a part of the space occupied by a person or an object, while the place is given the value of the minimum limit, and the space is given a maximum limit. Within the framework of the research, other approaches are highlighted that disclose the category of place in disciplinary and interdisciplinary contexts: sociological-behavioral, phenomenological, systemic, etc.

Іt is noted that the spatial revolution in the structure of cognition determined the analysis of state policy in spatial categories, which substantiated modern interdisciplinary measurements of the environment of state policy. Аnd — the appearance in the thesaurus public policy topological and metric features reality: location periphery, a center, location and interaction “places”, theme composition state policy, etc.

Therefore, the category “place” confers on the environment of state policy a social and cognitive entity, which, in particular, is defined in the concept of identity and leads to the emergence of new approaches to the analysis of identity: regional, local identities, identification with a place, environment or residence.