PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION FROM THE STANDPOINT OF DETERMINISTIC SOCIAL SENSE (ARCHETYPAL APPROACH)
Keywords:
sense, social sense, deterministic sense, public administration, archetype, archetypal approachAbstract
The features and the role of deterministic social sense in the context of the archetypical approach are considered in the article; the specifics of the existence of the above-mentioned phenomenon in relation to public administration are presented. The nature, principles of the functioning of archetypes as a direct, pragmatic decision-making factor of the personality are represented. It is argued that archetypes are significantly different from those historically established or transformed by human characters, whose senses are not mentally inherited, but transmitted from generation to generation. The emphasis is placed on the relevance of the archetypal approach for research in the management sector in general and deterministic social sense — in particular. The author emphasizes that the archetype is a direct pragmatic factor in personal decision-making, acting as a created internal complication that ensures the course of certain socially determined processes in the human brain. Attention is focused on the continuity of the concepts of “sense” and “culture”: from the moment of alienation of a person from the surrounding natural world, all thoughts, created things, found and used means and methods of actions are given meanings. Thus, the decision, that is, the choice, appears to be the natural basis for an individual’s being in ontological reality, acting as a necessary precondition for structuring his administrative, legal and so on needs in modern society. Further investigation of the archetypal approach to the study of the phenomenon of deterministic social sense is seen in the study of the features of citizens’ reflection on the images and symbols created by the government in order to achieve some behavioral manifestations in the latter, allowing more deeply and clearly understand the needs of the people, and also to update the relevant role of public administration in his life. At the same time, from the standpoint of social, psychological, culturological pragmatics etc., the archetype is the primary form of sense stratified according to the types described by Jung. This differentiation of this phenomenon is natural, due to its universalism, which allows us to speak about the degree of social adaptability of the latter.
References
Юнг К. Г. Психология бессозна- тельного / К. Г. Юнг; пер. с англ. — 2-е изд. — Москва : Когито-Центр, 2010. — 352 с.
Басс В. Бумажная архитектура [Электронный ресурс] / В. Басс // ПостНаука. — Режим доступа: https://postnauka.ru/faq/68819
Дудаков-Кашуро К. Дадаизм [Элек- тронный ресурс] / К. Дудако-Кашу- ро // ПостНаука. — Режим доступа: https://postnauka.ru/faq/70906
Архетип [Электронный ресурс] // Понятия и категории : вспомога- тельный проект портала “Хронос”. — Режим доступа: http://ponjatija.ru/taxonomy/term/1593
Колчанова Е. А. “Архетип” как кате- гория философии культуры : дис. … канд. филос. наук : спец. 24.00.01 / Е. А. Колчанова; Тюменский гос. ун-т. — Тюмень, 2006. — 160 с. 6. Гроф С. Архетипы, мифическое во- ображение и современное общество: новое очарование для мира [Электронный ресурс] / С. Гроф // Ста- нислав Гроф: персональный сайт. — Режим доступа: http://stanislavgrof.ru/articles/arhetipy-mificheskoe-voobrazhenie-i-sovremennoe-obshhestvonovoe-ocharovanie-dlya-mira.html
Вертель А. Архетип самости : хо- лизм в философии К. Г. Юнга / А. Вертель // Наук. вісн. Черні- вецького ун-ту: зб. наук. пр. — Вип. 646/647. — С. 45–51.
Колпаков В. М. Теория и практика принятия управленческих решений: учеб. пособие / В. М. Колпаков. — 2-е изд., перераб. и доп. — Киев : МАУП, 2004. — 504 с.
Кошетарова Л. Н. Архетип и сим- вол как основные формы выраже- ния культурных смыслов рекламы / Л. Н. Кошетарова // Знание. По- нимание. Умение. — 2010. — № 4. — С. 122–126.