THE ARCHETYPAL FOUNDATIONS OF VALUE CHOICE IN THE PROCESS OF ADAPTATION TO THE MODERN SOCIETY
Keywords:
archetype, values, beliefs, culture, decision-making process, state authority, civil society, system, environment, equilibrium, thinking, effectivenessAbstract
This article explains an importance of archetypal foundations for the value choice in order to adapt the state (system) to the modern society (environment). To provide effectiveness of the system requires maintaining equilibrium between the system and the environment through decision-making process (DMP) that is based on balance system’s ends, ways, and means in the framework of possible permissible risk.
Beliefs and values are critical for the DMP. Obsolete beliefs and values can decrease system effectiveness drastically. The main task is to produce decisions based on topical values to adapt the system to the environment and maintain national interests. An archetype can help to find a right set of values in a certain environment as a combination of the past and the future.
The paradox of the notions of beliefs and values is the need of their saving and the need of their change for successful system development at the same time. They are fundamental and their complete replacement can create chaos and even destroy the system at all. Thus, values choice is a vital and psychological painful process. At first it is difficult to understand the need of their change. Second, it is problematic to find appropriate values that should facilitate successful system development in the given and future environment.
To solve these problems the state authority (SA) and the civil society (CS) together should generate decisions through convergent and divergent processes of thinking. A national archetype, as a relatively stable mental structure, combines these processes together based on the experience. A proper balanced participation of the SA and the CS in the state leadership, based on required values, can make the system effective.
Value choice does not mean accepting or copying values of others, it means reconsidering current values in order to remain effective and functional as a nation in the modern society. Applying of archetypal foundations can help to choice proper beliefs and values that can facilitate making decisions that will provide soft adaptation of the system to a new environment without conflicts and revolutions.
References
Jung C. G. Edited by Gerhard Adler & R. F. C. Hull. (1970). “Psychology and Religion: West and East. Collected Works of C. G. Jung”. Vol. 11. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press.
Boeree C. George. (2006) “Carl Jung.” Archived from the original on 6 February 2006. Retrieved from: https://web.archive.org/web/20060206030011/ http://www.ship.edu/~cgboeree/jung.html
Brown R. S. (2013). “Beyond the Evolutionary Paradigm in Consciousness Psychology, Vol. 45, № 2, p. 159–171.
Retrieved from: http://atpweb.org/jtparchive/trps-45-13-02-159.pdf
Jacobi Jolande. (1959). Complex, Archetype, Symbol in the Psychology of C. G. Jung. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Corlett John G. and Pearson Carol S. (2003). Mapping the Organizational Psyche — A Jungian Theory of Organizational Dynamics and Change. Gainesville, Florida: Center for Applications of Psychological Type.
Feist J. and Feist G .J. (2009) Theories of Personality, New York New York; McGraw-Hill.
Freud S. (1917). “Introductory Lectures on Psycho-Analysis”. The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Volume XVI (1916–1917).
Schein E. H. (2010). Organizational culture and leadership. The Jossey- Bass business & management series, (4th ed.). San Francisco: Jossey- Bass.
Huntington Samuel P. (1993). “The Clash of Civilizations?” Foreign Affairs 72 (3), p. 22–49. 1996. The Clash of Civilizations and the Remarking of World Order. New York: Simons and Schuster.
Inglehart Ronald and Wayne E. Baker. (2000). “Modernization, Cultural Change, and the Persistence of Traditional Values”. American Sociological Review, Vol. 65, № 1 (February, p. 19– 51). Retrieved from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2657288
DiMaggio Paul. (1994). “Culture and Economy”. p. 27–57 in the Handbook of Economic Sociology, edited by N. J. Smelser and R. Swedberg. Princeton, Princeton University Press.
Inglehart Ronald and Wayne E. Baker. (2000). “Modernization, Cultural Change, and the Persistence of Traditional Values”. American Sociological Review, Vol. 65, № 1 (February, p. 19– 51). Retrieved from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2657288
Maslow A. H. (1943). “A theory of human motivation”. Psychological Review. 50 (4), p. 370–396. Retrieved from: http://psychclassics.yorku.ca/Maslow/motivation.htm
World Values Surveys. Retrieved from: http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSDocumentationWV6.jsp
Allen C. D. (2012). “Creative Thinking for Individuals and Teams”. An essay on creative thinking for military professionals. U. S. Army War College. Retrieved from: http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/army-usawc/allen_creative_thkg_sr_ldrs.pdf
Naplyokov Y. V. (2014). “An Algorithm for Maintaining Dynamic Equilibrium to Achieve Strategic Goals”. Master’s Thesis, U.S. Army War College, Carlisle Barracks, Pennsylvania 17013, USA.
Naplyokov Y. V. (2017). “Adaptation of the system through management of its center of gravity” // Public Management. — № 4 (9). — Р. 139–151.
Retrieved from: http://vadnd.org.ua/ua/collection/
Naplyokov Y. V. (2017). “Archetypical principles as a basis for non-conflicting decision-making” // Public Management. — № 3 (8). — Р. 194–203. Retrieved from: http://vadnd.org.ua/ua/collection/
Naplyokov Y. V. (2018). “Changing of mental models for effective decisionmaking” // Public Management. — № 1 (11). — Р. 189–206. Retrieved from: http://vadnd.org.ua/ua/collection/
Headquarters, Department of the Army (2015). FM 6-0, Commander and Staff Organization and Operations. Washington, DC, USA. 189
