FEATURES OF EFFECTIVE ADVERTISING COMMUNICATION IN SOCIO-POLITICAL ACTIVITIES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32689/maup.philol.2026.1.9Keywords:
digital platforms, framing, political public relations, narrativeAbstract
The transformation of the media environment due to digitalization has led to fundamental changes in the mechanisms of political influence and electoral mobilization. The algorithmic logic of modern platforms, audience micro-segmentation, and the viral dissemination of content create qualitatively new conditions for the implementation of advertising communications in the socio-political sphere. At the same time, the rapid growth in the volume of digital political advertising, the intensification of disinformation practices, and the deepening of societal polarization indicate that the technological evolution of the communication environment is outpacing its theoretical understanding, thereby highlighting the need for the development of new conceptual tools for analysis. A systematization of academic sources from 2021–2026 demonstrates that existing conceptual approaches are characterized by disciplinary fragmentation: the technological, psychological, and PR dimensions of communication are predominantly studied autonomously, outside their systemic interaction. This theoretical and methodological deficit defines the scientific problem of the study. The article aims to develop an integrative theoretical model of effective advertising communication in the socio-political sphere that synthesizes patterns of digital transformation, psychological determinants of public opinion influence, and practical tools for evaluating the effectiveness of public communications. Based on the results of conceptual synthesis, a systematic literature review, and structural analysis, a four-component model is proposed that includes the digital platform environment, the narrative-psychological mechanism, a system of effectiveness evaluation criteria, and an adaptive feedback loop. The model integrates both quantitative and qualitative indicators. Ethical risks associated with algorithmic micro-targeting and the manipulative potential of emotional framing in electoral processes are also substantiated separately. It is argued that achieving communicative effectiveness in the socio-political sphere is possible only through the systemic integration of platform architecture, psychological mechanisms of influence, and responsible communication principles.
References
Al Hadeed A.Y. Role of public relations practices in content management: the mediating role of new media platforms. Frontiers in Sociology. 2024. Vol. 8. Article 1273371. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2023.1273371 (дата звернення: 03.03.2026).
Anwar W. Adapting public relations strategies in contemporary political communications: navigating the digital landscape. Frontline Social Sciences and History Journal. 2024. Vol. 04, no. 04. P. 1–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37547/social-fsshj-04-04-01 (дата звернення: 03.03.2026).
Battista D. Political reconfiguration in the social space: data analysis and future perspective. Frontiers in Sociology. 2024. Vol. 8. Article 1226509. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2023.1226509 (дата звернення:03.03.2026).
Chansky R. 2024 political campaign ads and their impact on the media landscape. URL: https://insights.audiencex.com/political-campaign-ad-media/ (дата звернення: 05.03.2026).
Hastuti H., Maulana H. F., Lawelai H., Suherman A. Algorithmic influence and media legitimacy: a systematic review of social media’s impact on news production. Frontiers in Communication. 2025. Vol. 10. Article 1667471. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2025.1667471 (дата звернення: 03.03.2026).
López-Rabadán P. Framing studies evolution in the social media era. Digital advancement and reorientation of the research agenda. Social Sciences. 2021. Vol. 11, no. 1. Article 9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11010009 (дата звернення: 03.03.2026).
Mbayu N.-B. Getting political: analyzing political digital advertising compliance. URL: https://lnk.ua/TO6koanuS (дата звернення: 07.03.2026).
Pysarenko N. Marketing means of communication in politics and application of political marketing technologies using PR in the age of digital technologies. The Economic Discourse. 2024. Vol. 3–4. С. 176–185. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36742/2410-0919-2024-2-16 (дата звернення: 04.03.2026).
Ramírez-Salina C.A., Jiménez-Barbosa W.G., Cala Vitery F. From framing to emotion: evolving narratives in Ibero-American political mediatization (2008–2019). Frontiers in Communication. 2025. Vol. 10. Article 1616465. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2025.1616465 (дата звернення: 05.03.2026).
Ranjan A., Upadhyay A. K. Exploring the continuity and change in political advertising research: a systematic literature review. Cogent Social Sciences. 2024. Vol. 10, no. 1. Article 2376853. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2024.2376853 (дата звернення: 03.03.2026).
Smith M. Framing conflict: how social media influences voter opinions. URL: https://lnk.ua/F40xnMqwp (дата звернення: 09.03.2026).
Zhu J., Dommett K., Stafford T. What makes online political ads unacceptable? Interrogating public attitudes to inform regulatory responses. Humanities & Social Sciences Communications. 2025. Vol. 12. Article 806. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05114-1 (дата звернення: 06.03.2026).
Ковальов А. В. Політичні PR в контексті розвитку військово-політичної комунікації. Політична культура та ідеологія. 2025. № 3. С. 109–113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31558/2519-2949.2025.3.14 (дата звернення: 03.03.2026).
Шлемкевич Т., Шотурма Н. Реконфігурація комунікаційних стратегій державних та громадських акторів в українському інформаційному просторі в період 2024–2025 рр. Вісник Прикарпатського університету. Серія: Політологія. 2026. № 22. С. 378–385. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2312-1815/2025-22-44 (дата звернення: 03.03.2026).





