SOCIAL NETWORKS IN GLOBAL POLITICAL INTERACTION: CHALLENGES OF FAKES, MANIPULATIONS AND POST-TRUTH IN THE DIGITAL AGE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32689/2523-4625-2025-2(78)-5Keywords:
social media, political communication, digitalization, post-truth, disinformationAbstract
The article examines social media as a key factor in the transformation of modern political communication in the context of globalization and digitalization. The problem is posed by the fact that social media radically change the channels of interaction between politicians and the public, bypassing traditional media, which leads to the personalization of politics, image formation and rapid response to events. At the same time, however, such networks pose numerous challenges, including the spread of fakes, disinformation, manipulations, and the formation of the post-truth phenomenon, which undermine trust in democratic institutions and contribute to the polarization of society.An analysis of recent research and publications shows that the issue of social media in political communication is being actively studied in the context of the impact of digital technologies on democratic processes. In particular, the works of H. Yasha highlight the role of influencers and the commercialization of political content; I. Olefir emphasizes the dependence of access to information on political preferences; K. Afanasieva studies the social and security consequences of the spread of fakes, and P. Herbaudo and S. Blassnig study the phenomenon of digital populism. At the same time, scholarly discourse pays insufficient attention to the interaction of universalization (through English-language accounts) and fragmentation (through local memes), as well as the role of emotional narratives in the context of post-truth.The purpose of the article is to comprehensively analyze the impact of social media on political communication in the global context, to study the transformation of political interaction, mechanisms of information and disinformation dissemination, and to outline the main risks for democratic institutions in the digital age. The main material of the study analyzes how social networks transform political communication at the local, national and global levels, personalizing political discourse and simultaneously creating challenges of fragmentation.Particular attention is paid to the dominance of English in official accounts and the impact of local memes on political mobilization. The spread of populist messages through the algorithmic mechanisms of social networks, as well as the phenomenon of post-truth as a result of the prevalence of emotional narratives over facts, which is increasing in the digital environment, are investigated. The role of influencers in promoting politically oriented content is revealed, focusing on their commercialization and emotional content.The conclusions show that social networks, despite democratizing access to information, pose risks to the sustainability of democratic institutions due to fragmentation, polarization and manipulation. The author emphasizes the need to regulate and implement ethical standards in the digital environment to ensure open dialogue, transparency and privacy protection.
References
Арабаджиєв Д. Ю., Сергієнко Т. І. Політична маніпуляція та інформаційно-психологічна безпека в політичних відносинах. Політикус: Науковий журнал. Видавничий дім «Гельветика», 2020. № 2. С. 36–43.
Афанасьєва К. Цифрові технології у політичній комунікації: ризики та виклики. Наукові записки. 2024. № 2. С. 251–260.
Горбенко А. Постправда та демократичний дискурс: ризики і виклики. Політична психологія. 2024. № 1. С. 75–85.
Заяць Ю. «Паляниця» як маркер ідентичності: меметизація національного спротиву. Український медіаогляд. 2023. № 2. С. 18–25.
Міністерство закордонних справ України. Офіційний англомовний акаунт у Twitter. URL: https://twitter.com/MFA_Ukraine (дата звернення: 11.06.2025).
Олефір, І. Використання інформації як інструменту маніпуляцій. Інформаційне суспільство. 2022. № 4. С. 45–49.
Самчук З., Гурківська А. Постправда як інструмент політичного наративу епохи постмодерну. Політичні дослідження / Political Studies. 2023. № 1 (5). С. 163–177.
Baudrillard J. Simulacra and Simulation. Paris: Galilée, 1981. 315 с.
Blassnig, S. Social Media and Confrontational Messages in Political Campaigns. Political Psychology. 2018. No. 1. P. 100–115.
Castells M. Networks of Outrage and Hope: Social Movements in the Internet Age. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2012. 328 с.
European Commission. Digital Services Act. 2022. URL: https://ec.europa.eu/digital-services-act (дата звернення: 11.06.2025).
European External Action Service. Social Media Strategy and Multilingual Communication. EEAS Report, 2022. 42 с.
Farkas, X. Post-Truth Politics: Democratic Crisis and the Disinformation Complex. Budapest: Central European University Press, 2019. 320 p.
Gerbaudo, P. Social Media and Populism: The Impact of Algorithms on Political Narratives. Journal of Media Communications. 2020. No. 2. P. 33–47.
McLuhan M. Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. New York: McGraw Hill, 1964. 359 с.
McRaney, D. The Backfire Effect: How people strengthen their beliefs when confronted with facts. Psychology of Influence. 2019. Vol. 1. No. 1. P. 75–89.
Milner R. M. The World Made Meme: Public Conversations and Participatory Media. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2016. 272 с.
Moffitt B. The Global Rise of Populism: Performance, Political Style, and Representation. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2016. 272 с.
Tversky A., Kahneman D. Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Science. 1974. Vol. 185(4157). P. 1124–1131.
Wang Amy B. «Post-truth» named 2016 word of the year by Oxford Dictionaries. The Washington Post. 2016. URL: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/11/16/post-truth-named-2016-word-of-the-year-by-oxford-dictionaries/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.e5efd6986169 (дата звернення: 11.06.2025).
Yaşa H. Political communication in the digital age: The use of influencers in political campaigns. Journal of Modern Political Communication. 2023. No. 2. P. 45–60.