LANGUAGE AS AN INSTRUMENT OF TURKEY’S SOFT POWER

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32689/2523-4625-2025-2(78)-16

Keywords:

soft power, language, public diplomacy, cultural diplomacy, Turkey

Abstract

The article examines the understanding of the essence of soft power in modern international relations, as well as the role of language as an instrument of soft power on the example of Turkey. It is found that soft power is inherently an integrated, complex and immeasurable force that requires a more systematic and rigorous approach to research. A theoretical approach to improving national soft power requires quantifying soft power as the content of implementation from an interdisciplinary perspective rather than studying it in a single domain. The purpose of soft power is to persuade people or leaders of other countries to cooperate voluntarily and thus create a global environment favourable to the country’s interests. Soft power has been found to include the potential and appeal stemming from a country’s culture, values and social institutions, which is in line with the essence of «cultural diplomacy» in politics. Cultural diplomacy generally involves a long process of achieving mutual understanding and acceptance between countries by presenting their cultures to each other. It has been pointed out that language plays a crucial role in soft power and cultural diplomacy. Countries use their languages to spread influence, build mutual understanding and shape global perceptions. The article analyses Turkey’s experience of soft power and the role of language as an instrument of soft power. It is established that K. Ataturk’s reform of language policy not only democratised knowledge and literacy, but also steered the development of the Turkish language in a new direction, ridding it of centuries of accumulated influences in order to strengthen the unique Turkish cultural and linguistic identity for future generations. Modern Turkish serves as a bridge between the nation’s Ottoman past and its modern identity, embodying centuries of Anatolian heritage and changes in syntax and semantics. The Yunus Emre Institute is identified as having a major role in popularising Turkish as a soft power tool in Turkey.

References

Arslan Şerif, İşman Aytekin View of Turkish TV Series as a Soft Power Tool. Galactica Media: Journal of Media Studies. 2025. № 1. Р. 69–106.

Barnett M, Duvall R. Power in International Politics. International Organization. 2005. Vol. 59(01). P. 39–75. URL : https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818305050010

Berna Berkman Köselerli The Usage Of New Media In Cultural Diplomacy: A Case Of Turkey. European Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies. September-December. 2017. Volume 2, Issue 6. P. 115–120. URL: https:// revistia.com/files/articles/ejms_v2_i6_17/Berna.pdf

Caman Mehmet Üçüncü on yılında Türkiye’nin Orta Asya Bölgesel Politikası: Sübjektif Algılardan Gerçeklere. 2013. P. 175–223. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/337766118

Cline R. S. World power assessment: the calculus of strategic drift. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. 1975. URL : https://archive.org/details/worldpowerassess0000unse

Erdoğan’ın yeni hedefi Türkçe: Dil Devrimi ile damarlarımız kesildi. Ana sayfa. Manifesto gazete. 2018. URL: https://yurtsever.org.tr/2018/erdoganin-yeni-hedefi-turkce-dil-devrimi-ile-damarlarimiz-kesildi-162352/amp/

Espinosa J. M. Inter-American beginnings of US cultural diplomacy: 1936–1948. Cultural Relations Programs of the U.S. Department of State: Historical Studies, Number 2. URL: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED150051

Finn H. K. The case for cultural diplomacy: engaging foreign audiences. Foreign Affairs. 2003. Vol. 82. № 6. P. 15–20. URL: https://www.culturaldiplomacy.org/academy/content/articles/e-learning/read/a1/The_Case_for_Cultural_Diplomacy-_Engaging_Foreign_Audiences-_Helena_K._Finn.pdf

Gallarotti G. M. Soft power: what it is, why it’s important, and the conditions for its effective use. J. Political Power. 2011. Is. 4. P. 25–47. doi: 10.1080/2158379X.2011.557886

Gienow-Hecht J. C., Donfried M. C. Searching for a cultural diplomacy. Explorations in culture and international history. 2010. Vol. 6. Р. 1–264

Glaser B. S., Murphy M. E. Chinese soft power and its implications for the United States. Serial reports by the center for strategic and international studies. 2009. P. 10–26. URL: https://csis-website-prod.s3.ama-zonaws.com/s3fs-public/legacy_files/files/media/csis/pubs/090403_mcgiffert_chinesesoftpower_web.pdf

Hayden C. The rhetoric of soft power: public diplomacy in global contexts. Lanham, Maryland: Lexing- ton Books. 2012. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/269709449_The_Rhetoric_of_Soft_Power_Public_Diplomacy_in_Global_Contexts

Jingshu Gu. Shiping Deng Rearticulating the promotion of Japanese language and culture from the perspective of “soft power”: planning and effects. Front. Psychol. 2024 Sec. Cultural Psychology Volume 15. URL: https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1371271/full)

Kim Hwajung Cultural Diplomacy as the Means of Soft Power in an Information Age. Institute For Cultural Diplomacy. 2011. p. 1–8. URL: https://www.culturaldiplomacy.org/academy/index.php?cdr_acade-mic-articles_soft-power

Nye J. Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. Public Affairs. 2004. URL: https://www.academia.edu/23620658/Soft_Power_the_Means_to_Success_in_World_Politics_Joseph_S_Nye_Jr

Paschalidis G. Exporting national culture: histories of cultural institutes abroad. Int. J. Cult. Policy 2009. Is. 15. P. 275–289. doi: 10.1080/10286630902811148

Roig-Sanz Diana, Campanella Lucia, Carbó-Catalan Elisabet Translation as a soft power resource: exploring the possibilities, scope, and challenges of an interdisciplinary approach. Perspectives. Studies in Translation Theory and Practice. 2025. Volume 33. Issue 1. URL: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/0907676X.2025.2447143#abstract

Rousselin M. Turkish Soap Power: International Perspectives and Domestic Paradoxes. Euxeinos. 2013. Is.10 P. 16–23. URL: https://www.academia.edu/82530644/Turkish_Soap_Power_International_Per- spectives_and_Domestic_Paradoxes

Schmid B. C. Realist conceptions of power / Power in World Politics Ed. by F. Berenskoetter, M. J. Williams (Eds.). 2007 P. 43–63. URL: https://www.academia.edu/29788074/Power_in_world_politics

Soft Power 30 Portland Communica. URL: https://brandirectory.com/softpower

Strategy and Strategic Discourse in Turkish Foreign Policy by Hasan Yükselen Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. Palgrave Macmillan, 2020, 260 p.

Wilson E. J. III Hard power, soft power, smart power. Ann. Am. Acad. Pol. Soc. Sci. 2008. Is. 616, 110–124. doi: 10.1177/0002716207312618

Yunus Emre Enstitüsü URL: http://www.yee.org.tr/turkiye/tr/kurumsal/vakif-kanunu

Published

2025-10-01

How to Cite

МИЛОСЕРДНА, І., & ВІДІМСЬКА, К. (2025). LANGUAGE AS AN INSTRUMENT OF TURKEY’S SOFT POWER. Scientific Works of Interregional Academy of Personnel Management. Political Sciences and Public Management, (2(78), 107-112. https://doi.org/10.32689/2523-4625-2025-2(78)-16