RISK MANAGEMENT IN STRATEGIC GOVERNANCE: FROM THREATS TO PROACTIVE STRATEGIES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32689/2523-4625-2025-2(78)-22Keywords:
category of risk, risk management, strategic management, managerial decisions, public administrationAbstract
The purpose of this study is to reveal the ontological nature of risk as a category of future governance under conditions of strategic uncertainty, as well as to substantiate the necessity of creating specialized intellectual tools for effective risk management in various spheres, including public administration. The article analyzes the categorical essence of the concept of risk as a phenomenon arising at the boundary between the present and the future. Particular attention is paid to the conceptualization of risk management as an instrument for enhancing the effectiveness of managerial decisions.The research methodology is based on an interdisciplinary approach that combines philosophical and categorical analysis, logical and semantic reconstruction of concepts, elements of systems thinking, as well as interpretation of international risk management standards (in particular ISO 31000:2018 and ISO 31010:2009). Within the framework of source analysis, a comparative legal analysis of Ukrainian normative legal acts and international documents concerning the terms «risk», «uncertainty», «threat», and «danger» was also applied.The scientific novelty lies in the formulation of a new vision of risk as an intellectual tool for managing the future in the context of present decisions. Risk is interpreted as a measurable form of uncertainty that enables the projection of current actions while taking into account possible future scenarios. It is proposed to consider risk as manageable uncertainty that requires the development of specialized response models. It is demonstrated that risk performs the function of an integrative managerial category, which allows not only the identification of potential threats but also the formation of proactive decision-making strategies at the level of any policy.Conclusions. Risk is a key element of strategic management under conditions of ambiguity and dynamic uncertainty.It appears not only as a challenge but also as an instrument for the constructive formation of the future. Effective risk management requires the creation of a holistic intellectual toolkit that integrates analytical, predictive, and normative mechanisms. In this context, risk management is not only a reaction to potential dangers but also an active strategy for designing a safe and foreseeable future. The standardization of approaches to risk management (in particular ISO31000) creates a methodological foundation for the unified identification, analysis, and response to risks in various fields – from public administration and national security to the economy, technosphere, and social environment.
References
Енциклопедія державного управління : у 8 т. / Нац. акад. держ. упр. при Президентові України ; наук. ред. кол. : Ю. В. Ковбасюк (голова) [та ін.]. К. : НАДУ, 2011. Т. 2 : Методологія державного управління / наук. ред. кол. : Ю. П. Сурмін (співголова), П. І. Надолішній (співголова) [та ін.]. 692 с.
Науменко В. Поняття невизначеності та відображення ризику у практиці формування державних цільових програм соціально-економічного розвитку. Інвестиції: практика та досвід. 2023. № 7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32702/2306-6814.2023.7.135
Овандер Н. Огляд міжнародних та українських стандартів з управління ризиками з погляду сучасних викликів та загроз. Економіка та суспільство. 2021. № 27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2021-27-26
Cтепанян М., Шевченко А. Оцінка координації управління ризиками та загрозами. Київ : ПРООН в Україні, 2020. 60 с. URL: https://www.undp.org/sites/g/files/zskgke326/files/migration/ua/Risk-and-Threats-Management-Coordination-Assessment_UA.pdf (дата звернення: 08.05.2025).
Писаренко А., Комліченко О. Управління ризиками екологічних проєктів. Суспільство та національні інтереси. 2024. № 4(4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.52058/3041-1572-2024-4(4)-1270-1283
Про національну безпеку України: Закон України від 31.03.2023 р. № 2469-VIII. Офіційний вебпортал Верховної Ради України. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2469-19#Text (дата звернення: 15.07.2024).
Bentahar A., Rifai A. Risk and risk management in the public sector: A theoretical contribution. Journal of Economics and Finance Management Studies. 2023. Vol. 5, No. 9. Article 3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47191/jefms/v5-i9-03
DeMarco T., Lister T. Waltzing with Bears: Managing Risk on Software Projects. New York : Dorset House Publishing, 2003
Drennan L. T., McConnell A., Stark A. Risk and crisis management in the public sector. 2nd ed. London : Routledge, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315816456
Harry C. T., Gallagher N. W. An effects-centric approach to assessing cybersecurity risk. 2019. URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep20424 (дата звернення: 05.06.2025).
International Organization for Standardization. ISO 31000:2018. Risk management – Guidelines. Geneva : ISO, 2018. URL: https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/ru/#iso:std:iso:31000:ed-2:v1:en (дата звернення: 05.06.2025).
Ministry of Economic Development of Ukraine. National standard of Ukraine: Risk management. General risk assessment methods (IEC/ISO 31010:2009, IDT) (DSTU IEC/ISO 31010:2013). Kyiv : Ministry of Economic Development, 2015.
Project Management Institute. A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK® Guide). 7th ed. Newtown Square, PA : Project Management Institute, 2021. URL: https://www.pmi.org/standards/pmbok (дата звернення: 05.06.2025).