RESEARCH TRADITIONS IN COGNITIVE SOCIOLOGY AND SOCIOLINGUISTICS — LANGUAGE AND MEANING IN SOCIAL INTERACTION

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32689/2617-2224-2020-1(21)-324-335

Keywords:

language, social interaction, cognitive sociology, sociolinguistics, communication, social actions, symbols, meaning, linguistic situation

Abstract

The specificity of the development of the research traditions of the cognitive linguistics and sociolinguistics is considered in the article. The problems of understanding everyday language at the present stage of the science development are substantiated. The current state of the development of the ethnomethodological approach, the role of non-verbal communications in everyday communication is analyzed. The author substantiates the nature of the social action, peculiarities of functioning and interaction of the social actors through symbols and meanings. The author analyzes the developed models of the communication interaction by W. Schramm, D. McQuail, J. Grunig, T. Hunt, Y. Habermas, N. Luman. The content of one of the key concepts of the sociolinguistics — “linguistic situation”, which is defined as a set of forms of existence of the language (languages, regional koine, territorial and social dialects) is revealed. The author notes that special attention is paid in the contemporary sociolinguistics to the question of the connection and interaction of the language and culture. The features of the development of the cognitive linguistics as a linguistic trend, which considers the functioning of the language as a kind of cognitive, that is, knowing, activity, and examines the cognitive mechanisms and structures of the human consciousness through linguistic phenomena. The author confirms the basic hypothesis of the cognitive science that the thinking processes can be interpreted as processes of processing and transformation of the mental representations. The author draws on the ideas of the main proponent and representative of the cognitive sociology — American sociologist Aaron Cicourel. Also — substantiates the content of the works of the French sociologist J. Padioleau and the concepts of sociolinguistics A. Meiller, F. Boas, E. Sapir, V. Mathesius, B. Gavranek, J. Vachek and others, who made a significant contribution to the identification of the role of the social factors in the development of the languages and demonstrated the link between the language and the social processes and the social role of the literary language.

References

Шарков Ф. И. Коммуникология: основы теории коммуникации / Ф. И. Шарков. М.: Дашков и К, 2017. 488 с.

McQuail D. Mass Communication Theory: an Introduction / D. Mc- Quail. London: SAGE, 1987. 632 p.

Grunig J. Public Relation Theory / J. Grunig. – N.Y., 1998. – P. 29–41.

Хабермас Ю. Моральное сознание и коммуникативное действие / Ю. Хабермас. СПб.: Наука, 2001. 380 с.

Луман Н. Общество как социальная система / Н. Луман. М.: Логос, 2004. 232 с.

Коркюф Ф. Новые социологии / Ф. Коркюф; пер. с фр. Е. Д. Возне- сенской, М. В. Федоровой; науч. ред. Н. А. Шматко. – М: Ин-т экс- периментальной социологии; СПб.: Алетейя, 2002 г. 172 с.

Cicourel A.V. Notes on the Integration of Micro- and Macro-Levels of Analysis/ Eds. K. Knorr-Cetina, A. V. Cicourel // Advances in Social Theory and Methodology. Towards an Integration of Micro- and Macro Sociologies. – Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1981. – P. 53.

Подьоло Ж. Социальный порядок: принципы социологического анализа / Ж. Подьоло // Современная западная социология: классические традиции и поиски новой пара- дигмы. М., 1990. С. 93–110.

Вахтин Н. Б. Социолингвистика и социология языка: Учеб. пособие / Н. Б. Вахтин, Е. В. Головко. СПб.: ИЦ “Гуманитарная академия”; Изд- во Европейского университета в Санкт-Петербурге, 2004. 336 с.

Чурилина Л. Н. Актуальные проблемы современной лингвистики: Учеб. пособие / Л. Н. Чурилина. М., 2009. С. 107–135, 307–342.

Published

2020-05-29

How to Cite

Черних, Г. (2020). RESEARCH TRADITIONS IN COGNITIVE SOCIOLOGY AND SOCIOLINGUISTICS — LANGUAGE AND MEANING IN SOCIAL INTERACTION. Public Management, (1 (21), 324-335. https://doi.org/10.32689/2617-2224-2020-1(21)-324-335

Issue

Section

Статті