ARCHITECTIC COMPONENT OF INSTITUTIONAL NETWORKS DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY IN THE CONTEXT OF NATIONAL SECURITY PROVIDING

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32689/2617-2224-2019-18-3-324-338

Keywords:

national security, archetype, institution, institutional network, strategy

Abstract

The relevance of the study of the security aspects of the present processes and the prospects for development within the framework of the archetype methodology is determined by the fact that the systemic transformation of society requires a more precise determination of the factors of a number of processes. This issue is also actualized in the context of the course on forming an effective dialogue with the society, research of mechanisms and ways to improve the quality of interaction between the state, business and society. Therefore, it becomes necessary to develop the theoretical and methodological foundations of an integrated model for organizing the interaction of the processes of individual self-regulation, corporate development and public administration based on an archetype approach. The aim of the study is to analyze the archetypal component of the formation of institutional networks in the context of security strategies. Institutional-network approach to security strategies involves consideration of a set of institutions and the laws of their interaction within the framework of active networks that ensure the transformation of resources into real results by effective methods in accordance with the national context and the needs of society. The source of the answers to the question of security is proposed to consider from the point of view of archetypes. The approaches outlined in the study are based on the understanding that in modern conditions of government and responding to threats to national security cannot be limited to traditional methods. The role of sociocultural institutions has been determined, which rises in modern conditions in solving problems in the security-development system, on the one hand, and the objective need to use their potential, on the other. This makes it possible to include archetypes in the processes of ensuring security not only on the basis of the complementarity principle, but also on an equal footing due to the development of their interaction with formal institutions. Using an archetypal approach will help to develop innovative approaches to the development of security strategies through solutions based on comprehensive research and public policy agendas.

References

Bloksberg L., Mogulof D., Stern M., Walter F. Homans’ Theory Of The Human Group: Applications To Problems of Administration, Policy, and Staff Training In Group Service Agencies // Journal of Jewish Communal Service: National Conference of Jewish Communal Service. 1964, p. 379–395.

National Security & Innovation Activities: Methodology, Policy and Practice. edited by Dr. of Economics, Prof. O. Prokopenko, Ph.D in Economics V. Omelyanenko, Ph.D in Technical Sciences, Assoc. Prof. Yu. Ossik. — Ruda Śląska: Drukarnia i Studio Graficzne Omnidium. 2018. 416 p.

Omelyanenko V. A. Archetypical analysis of the innovation development resources of European public administrative space (comparative approach) // Public management. — 2018. — № 4 (14). — Р. 198–212.

Яровий А. М. Методологічні інно- вації економічної науки в контексті переходу до нової парадигми пост- модернізму // Регіональна бізнес- економіка та управління. — 2013. — № 4. — С. 77–85.

Андреев А. Л. Политическая психо- логия. — М.: Весь мир, 2002.

Гулевич О. Ю. Трудовий менталітет як інституціональний індикатор соціально-економічного розвитку су- спільства // Наук. вісн. НАСОА. — 2015. — № 1. — С. 35–42.

Никитенко П. Г. Ноосферная эко- номика как планетарная жизнедея- тельностная хозяйственная сфера цивилизационного развития // Экономические и социальные пере- мены: факты, тенденции, прогноз. — 2010. — № 3 (11). — URL: http://esc.volnc.ru/article/157

Якупов С. Ф. Менталитет и со- циальные институты как факторы прогресса: на примере индийской цивилизации // Вестн. Челябин- ского гос. ун-та. — 2013. — № 13 (304). Философия. Социология. Культурология. — Вып. 29. — С. 33– 40.

Мюрдаль Г. Азиатская драма: Ис- следование нищеты народов. — М., 1970. — 204 с.

Юрин А. Н. К понятию безопасность: кто и как определяет угрозу сегод- ня? // Regional Dialogue. 14.06.2016. URL: http://regional-dialogue.com/ru/security/

Cervantes M., Meissner D. Commercialising Public Research under the Open Innovation Model: New Trends // Foresight. — 2014. — Vol. 8. — № 3. — Р. 70–81.

Яшина А. В. Концепции обеспечения национальной безопасности в демо- кратических государствах. — С.-Пе- терб. гос. ун-т. — СПб., 2013. — 237 с.

Social Institutions. Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy. URL: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/social-institutions/

Dupont B. Security in the age of networks // Policing & Society. — 2004. — № 14 (1). — Р. 76–91.

Эдвинсон Л. Корпоративная долгота: Навигация в экономике, основан- ной на знаниях. — М.: ИНФРА-М, 2005.

Tseng C.-Y., Goo Y.-J. J. Intellectual Capital and Corporate Value in an Emerging Economy: Empirical Study of Taiwanese Manufacturers // R&D Management. — 2005. — Vol. 35. — № 2. — P. 187–199.

Бернейс Э. М. Пропаганда. Hippo Publishing LTD, 2010. URL: https://propagandahistory.ru/books/Edvard-Berneys_Propaganda/

North D. Institutions and Economic Growth: An Historical Introduction // World Development. — 1989. — Vol. 17. — № 9. — Р. 1319–1332.

Институты развития городов: успешные кейсы. URL: https://habr.com/ru/post/405343/

Published

2019-05-29

How to Cite

Омельяненко, В. (2019). ARCHITECTIC COMPONENT OF INSTITUTIONAL NETWORKS DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY IN THE CONTEXT OF NATIONAL SECURITY PROVIDING. Public Management, (3 (18), 324-338. https://doi.org/10.32689/2617-2224-2019-18-3-324-338

Issue

Section

Статті