DEVELOPMENT OF TRANSPORT INFRASTRUCTURE IN CONDITIONS OF MARTIAL STATE AS AN OBJECT OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32689/3083-774X-2026-2(47)-12Keywords:
public administration, transport infrastructure, regional development, martial law, logistics resilience, recoveryAbstract
The article examines the level of spatial inequalities in the development of transport infrastructure in the regions of Ukraine as an object of public administration under martial law. It is shown that the prewar transport infrastructure of Ukraine was characterized by significant regional heterogeneity, which was manifested in differences between regions in the volume of freight and passenger transportation, the availability of transport services, the role of road, rail, sea and urban transport, as well as the concentration of production, logistics and service functions. It is established that after the start of the full-scale war with the Russian Federation, these inequalities did not disappear, but acquired a new functional meaning. In fact, some traditionally powerful industrial and transport regions lost transport accessibility due to hostilities, occupation, destruction of roads, bridges and railway junctions, while the western and central regions strengthened their role in ensuring foreign trade, population evacuation, business relocation, humanitarian logistics and internal redistribution of flows. The dynamics of freight and passenger transportation in 2024-2025 were analyzed, which indicates a partial adaptation of the transport system to the conditions of martial law. It was determined that the spatial inequality of the development of the transport infrastructure of the regions of Ukraine in modern conditions is multilayered and is formed under the influence of the pre-war heterogeneity of the transport infrastructure, military destruction, changes in logistics routes, blocking of part of the maritime logistics, closing of airspace, overloading of western border crossings and the growth of the role of railway and road transport. Particular attention is paid to the sectoral asymmetry of the development of transport infrastructure by regions of Ukraine, which is manifested in the different dependence of regions on individual types of transport and in the unequal ability of territories to ensure economic activity, population mobility and the stability of logistics chains. In modern conditions, the transport infrastructure of the regions of Ukraine should be considered not only as a technical or economic system, but as a strategic object of public administration, economic stability and national security. Overcoming the spatial inequality of transport infrastructure development by regions of Ukraine requires a differentiated approach from public administration entities: for frontline and deoccupied territories - priority restoration of basic accessibility and security; for western border regions - expansion of capacity, development of multimodal terminals and transition to TEN-T standards; for central regions - strengthening of distribution, bridge and railway nodes; for southern regions - restoration of port, Danube and maritime logistics. It is this approach that will make it possible to combine emergency recovery, regional balance, European integration and long-term modernization of the transport infrastructure of Ukraine.
References
State Statistics Service of Ukraine (2026). Integrated indicators of transport statistics, Retrieved from: https://stat.gov.ua/en/datasets/integrated-indicators-transport-statistics.
State Statistics Service of Ukraine (2026). Kil’kist perevezenykh pasazhyriv za vydamy transportu (ostatochni) za 2024–2025 roky [Number of passengers transported by type of transport, 2024–2025], Retrieved from: https://stat.gov.ua/sites/default/files/2026-02/kilkist_perevezenykh_pasazhyriv_za_vydamy_transportu_za_2024.xlsx .
State Statistics Service of Ukraine (2026). Obsyahy perevezenykh vantazhiv za vydamy transportu (ostatochni) za 2024 rik [Volume of freight transportation by type of transport, 2024], Retrieved from: https://stat.gov.ua/sites/default/files/2026-02/obsyahy_perevezenykh_vantazhiv_za_vydamy_transportu_za_2024.xlsx.
State Statistics Service of Ukraine (2026). Obsyahy perevezenykh vantazhiv za vydamy transportu (ostatochni) za 2025 rik [Volume of freight transportation by type of transport 2025], Retrieved from: https://stat.gov.ua/sites/default/files/2026-02/opv_vt_2025.xlsx.
Lebedeva, L. and Shkuropadska, D. (2024). “Stijkist’ transportnoi lohistyky YeS ta Ukrainy”, Zovnishnia torhivlia: ekonomika, finansy, pravo, vol. 4 (135), pp. 108–127. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31617/3.2024(135)07.
Mamatova, T. V. and Krasiuk, N. S. (2024). “Zabezpechennia stiikosti transportno-lohistychnoi infrastruktury v Ukraini: normatyvne pidgruntia, vyklyky ta perspektyvy”, Dniprovs’kyi naukovyi chasopys publichnoho upravlinnia, psykholohii, prava, vol. 3, pp. 59–63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51547/ppp.dp.ua/2024.3.9.
Ministry for Communities and Territories Development of Ukraine (2026), YeCherha: 3 miliony peretyniv kordonu za onlain-zapysom, Retrieved from: https://mindev.gov.ua/news/yecherha-3-miliony-peretyniv-kordonu-za-onlain-zapysom.
Komornicki, T. et al. (2023). “New transport infrastructure and regional development of Central and Eastern Europe”, Sustainability, vol. 15 (6), Article 5263. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15065263.
KSE Institute (2025). “Report on damages to infrastructure from the destruction caused by Russia’s military aggression against Ukraine as of November 2024”, Retrieved from: https://kse.ua/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/KSE_Damages_Report-November-2024---ENG.pdf.
Kyriacou, A. P., Muinelo-Gallo, L. and Roca-Sagalés, O. (2019). “The efficiency of transport infrastructure investment and the role of government quality: An empirical analysis”, Transport Policy, vol. 74, pp. 93–102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.11.017.
Mitoulis, S. A., Argyroudis, S. A., Panteli, M. et al. (2023). “Conflict-resilience framework for critical infrastructure peace-building”, Sustainable Cities and Society, vol. 91, Article 104405. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2023.104405.
OECD (2026). Infrastructure Policy Review of Ukraine: transport sector considerations, a Retrieved from: https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/2026/06/infrastructure-policy-review-of-ukraine_15286cb8/full-report/transport-sector-considerations_913ded74.html.
Radchenko, O., Kuczabski, A., Boychuk, A. and Klimovych, S. (2022). “Transport and transport infrastructure of Ukraine in the pre-war period (2010–2021)”, Prace Komisji Geografii Komunikacji PTG, vol. 25 (2), pp. 7–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4467/2543859XPKG.22.009.16267.
Reuters (2025). “Ukraine needs 500 million euros to rebuild critical port facilities damaged by Russia”, Retrieved from: https://www.reuters.com/world/ukraine-needs-500-million-euros-rebuild-critical-port-facilities-damaged-by-2025-05-30/.
Rossolov, O., Potaman, N., Levchenko, O. and Susilo, Y. O. (2025). “Urban mobility under armed conflict: shifts in mode preferences and public transport fare behaviors”, European Transport Research Review, vol. 17, Article 17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12544-025-00714-z.











