AI-REFERENCES AS A TOOL FOR FORMING VISUAL STYLE IN DIGITAL DESIGN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32689/maup.it.2025.4.11Keywords:
digital design, AI references, visual style, generative models, artificial intelligence, design ethicsAbstract
The article explores the phenomenon of using artificial intelligence (AI) as a tool for creating visual references in the digital design process. It analyzes how generative neural networks (such as Midjourney, DALL·E, and Stable Diffusion) influence the formation of visual style, compositional decisions, and stages of conceptual development. Special attention is given to the role of AI-generated references in transforming designers’ creative thinking and their potential when combined with traditional methods of visual research. The study also addresses aesthetic and ethical aspects of using AI in creative practices, including issues of authorship, originality, and artistic responsibility. The findings suggest that AI references are not only a technical aid but also a new means of shaping the visual language of digital design, opening perspectives for rethinking the relationship between human creativity and technology. Research objective. To determine the role and significance of AI references in the process of forming a visual style in digital design, to analyze their impact on the stages of conceptual search, and to outline the aesthetic and ethical aspects of using artificial intelligence in the creative practice of a designer. Research methodology. The study uses a system-analytical approach that combines theoretical analysis of scientific sources with a visual comparative analysis of traditional and AI-generated references. The methods of content analysis, observation and interpretation, as well as elements of practical modeling of the design process with the involvement of generative neural networks (Midjourney, DALL·E, Stable Diffusion), were used. Scientific novelty. For the first time, the concept of AI reference as a separate category in the visual culture of digital design is systematically considered. Its functions in the formation of stylistic unity, compositional construction and development of the designer's author's handwriting are determined. The impact of generative systems on changing approaches to visual thinking, creative search and pedagogical practice in the field of design is substantiated. Conclusions. The use of AI-references in digital design opens up new opportunities for creative search, accelerates the stages of idea development and contributes to the formation of an individual style. At the same time, their use requires awareness of ethical and authorial issues that arise in connection with automated image generation. Artificial intelligence becomes not only a technical tool, but also a co-creator, influencing the formation of a new visual language and expanding the boundaries of artistic experimentation in the field of digital design.
References
Gerenko С. Штучний інтелект у графічному дизайні: кейс генеративних нейромереж. Деміург: ідеї, технології, перспективи дизайну. 2024. Т. 7, № 1. С. 78–91. DOI: 10.31866/2617-7951.7.1.2024.300924. URL: https://demiurge.knukim.edu.ua/article/view/300924
Novakovskyi A., Yaloveha I. Implementation of generative artificial intelligence technologies in creative activities: development of a structural model of design thinking. Innovative Technologies and Scientific Solutions for Industries. 2024. № 2. DOI: 10.30837/2522-9818.2024.2.108.
Oh H., Song J., Choi S., Kim H., Lee J., Suh Y. The effects of generative AI model type and visual stimuli type on design creativity. AI EDAM. Cambridge University Press, 2024. URL: https://www.cambridge.org
Hofman G. Towards a practical ethics of generative AI in creative production processes. arXiv preprint. 2024. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.03579
Wilson R., Hong E. Artificial Intelligence and Neural Style Transfer in the Context of Art and Design: Ethical and Anticipated Ethical Issues. Proceedings of the International Conference on AI Research (ICAIR). 2024. Vol. 4, No. 1. DOI: 10.34190/icair.4.1.3185.
Srinivasan R., Uchino K. Biases in generative art – a causal look from the lens of art history. arXiv preprint. 2020. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.13266
Amer S. K. AI Imagery and the Overton Window. arXiv preprint. 2023. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.00080
Kutanova D. The use of generative graphics in graphic design: aesthetics and ethics. Journal of Arts and Humanities. 2024. DOI: 10.18533/cfcafs32.
Li C., Zhang T., Du X., Zhang Y., Xie H. Generative AI Models for Different Steps in Architectural Design: A Literature Review. arXiv preprint. 2024. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.01335
Wang X. та ін. Perceptions and integration of generative artificial intelligence in creative practices and industries: a scoping review and conceptual model. AI & Society. 2025. DOI: 10.1007/s00146-025-02667-2.
Zhang Y. та ін. Creative generation and evaluation system of art design based on artificial intelligence. Discover Artificial Intelligence. Springer, 2025. URL: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s44163-025-00343-4
Shydlovsky A. P. Capabilities of Artificial Intelligence for Image Creation. Матеріали конференції AIIT01 2024. Київ, 2024. URL: https://it.nuft.edu.ua/wp-content/themes/itaicstheme/assets/docs/2024-1-Conf_AIIT01_2024-06-04_v0721.pdf
Students’ Perceptions of Generative AI Image Tools in Design Education: Insights from Architectural Education. Education Sciences. 2024. Vol. 15, No. 9. P. 1160. DOI: 10.3390/educsci15091160.







