MODERN WAYS OF IMPLEMENTATION OF POLITICAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMATION OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32689/2617-9660-2019-4-2-180-193

Keywords:

reformation, public administration, decentralization, administrative- territorial structure, provision of administrative services, optimization of authorities.

Abstract

The article identifies six main directions of political and administrative reforms in the leading EU countries: first, informatization and de-bureaucratization; and secondly, new managerialism; thirdly, decentralization; fourthly, service administration; fifth, «Good Governance»; sixthly, the reform of the public service system. Informatization and de-bureaucratization mean the transition from the concept of classical bureaucracy, based on the hierarchy and closedness of the management system, to a new information paradigm based on open network structures and management of results. The new management involves the borrowing of advanced developments and the basic principles of management in business management, which implies a modern view of the organization as a flexible «balancing» system that can adapt to the challenges of the external environment. The most successful ideas in this direction were «organizational cybernetics», the principle of managing the results, reducing microcontrol, active material incentives for labor, and others. Service administration or the idea of the administration as an appeal to the service is a new understanding of state bodies as service providers to citizens. Decentralization (de-concentration, outsourcing) is to lower the decision-making process at grass-roots levels – where problems arise. «Good Governance» is mainly aimed at overcoming such shortcomings in new state management as a secondary issue of solving social problems and, as a result, increasing social inequality and poverty, especially in developing countries; erosion of the role of the state and civil servants in public relations; the emphasis on the universality of the proposed methods of reform rather than the institutional context of each country. Reforming the public service system is the basis of political and administrative reform. At this stage of the reform of the public administration system, it is necessary to carry out an audit of the results of the previous reforms, identify their shortcomings, the results and find out the possible ways of improving the system of public administration. The next step is to formulate a Concept for political and administrative reform of the public administration system.

References

Головін Р. Адміністративні реформи провідних країн світу як механізм державного антикризового управління. Вісник НАДУ. 2014. № 1. С. 89-96.

Звіт Європейської Комісії. URL: http://ec.europa.eu/ internal_market/economic_analysis/ docs/financial_integration_reports/ 20120426-efsir_en.pdf

Kearney R.C., Hays S.W. Reinventing Government. The New Public Management and Civil Service Systems in International Perspective. The Danger of Throwing the Baby out with the Bathwater. Review of Public Personnel Administration. 1998. vol. XVIII. № 4.

Грэй Э., Дженкинс Б. От государственного управления к государственному менеджменту: переоценка переворота. Государственная служба. Проблемы реформирования. Зарубежный опыт. 1995. Вып. 8. С. 7-12.

Osborne D., Gaebler T. Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit Is Transforming the Public Sector. N.Y., 1993.

Барч У. Возможности внедрения зарубежного опыта в условиях России. Государственная служба. 2007. № 6. с. 170-180.

The Good Governance Standard for Public Services. URL: http://www. coe.int/t/dghl/standardsetting/ media/doc/Good_Gov_StandardPS_ en.pdf (дата обращения: 20.04.2014).

UNDP. Governance for Sustainable Human Development. Jan., 1997. URL: http://gis.emro.who. int/HealthSystemObservatory/ Workshops/WorkshopDocuments/ Reference%20reading%20material/ Literature%20on%20Governance/ GOVERN~2.PDF (дата обращения: 20.04.2014).

Caddy J. Why Citizens Are Central to Good Governance. The OECD Observer. 2001. № 229.

9Citizens as Partners. OECD Handbook on Information, Consultation and Public Participation in Policy-Making / ed. by M. Gramberger. Paris, 2001.

Argynades D. Good Governance. Professionalism, Ethics and Responsibility. International Review of Administrative Sciences. 2006. № 72.

The European Administrative Space: Governance in Diversity. Annual Conference of the European Group of Public Administration (EGPA), September 2002, the University of Potsdam. URL : http://www.uni-potsdam. de/egpa2002.

Шаповалова І. Сучасні тенденції у реформуванні державного управління: зарубіжний досвід для України. Ефективність державного управління. 2017. ВИП. 3 (52). Ч. 1. С. 81-88.

Jann W. Verwaltungsreform als Verwaltungspolitik. Verwaltungsmodernisierung und PolicyForschung / Schroter E. (Hrsg.) Empirische Policy und Verwaltungsforschung. Lokale, nationale und internationale Perspektiven. Opladen : Springer, 2001.

Benz A. Institutionentheorie und Institutionenpolitik // Benz, A., Siedentopf, J. H., Sommermann, K.- P. (Hrsg.) Institutionenwandel in Regierung und Verwaltung. Festschrift fur Klaus Konig zum 70. Geburtstag. Berlin : Duncker & Humblot, 2004.

Wollmann H. Evaluierung und Evaluierungsforschung von Verwaltungspolitik und -modernisierung— zwischen Analysepotenzial und — defizit // Stockmann, R. (Hrsg.) Evaluationsforschung. Opladen : Springer, 2000a.

Kuhlmann S. Die Evaluation von Institutionenpolitik in Deutschland. Verwaltungsmodernisierung und Wirkungsanalyse im foderalen System // Widmer T., Beywl W., Carlo F. (Hrsg.) Evaluation. Ein systematisches Handbuch. Wiesbaden : VS Verlag fur Sozialwissenschaften, 2009.

11Easton D. A. A Framework for Political Analysis. Englewood Cliffs : Prentice-Hall, 1965.

Scharpf F. W. Regieren in Europa. Effektiv und demokratisch? Frankfurt a. M. New York : Campus Verlag, 1999.

Scharpf F. W. Interaktionsformen. Akteurzentrierter Institutionalismus in der Politikforschung. Opladen : Springer, 2000

Zurn M. Regieren jenseits des Nationalstaates. Globalisierung und Denationalisierung als Chance. Frankfurt a. M. : Suhrkamp Verlag,1998.

Zurn M. Democratic Governance Beyond the Nation-State. The EU and Other International Institutions . European Journal of International Relations. 2000. Vol. 6. N 2. P. 183–221.

Published

2019-08-15

How to Cite

Сак, Ю. А. (2019). MODERN WAYS OF IMPLEMENTATION OF POLITICAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMATION OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. Expert: Paradigm of Law and Public Administration, (2(4), 180-193. https://doi.org/10.32689/2617-9660-2019-4-2-180-193

Issue

Section

REGIONAL GOVERNANCE AND LOCAL SELF-GOVERNMENT