GENOME EDITING: CLUSTERED REGULARLY INTERSPACED SHORT PALINDROMIC REPEAT (CRISPR/CAS9)

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32689/2663-0672-2023-3-2

Keywords:

Molecular scissors, CRISPR/Cas9, genome, DNA, RNA, oncology, sickle cell anemia, β-thalassemia, amyloidosis, nanotechnology, Duchenne muscular dystrophy, Parkinson's disease, digenic tinnitus, monogenic deafness

Abstract

The increase in the prevalence of oncological diseases and genetic diseases among the world population remains an open problematic issue of the scientific world, connected with the need to develop modern methods of treatment. The main goal of conducting research is to reduce the overall rate of mortality and disability among the world population. One of the promising technologies of genetic engineering is the Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeat (CRISPR/Cas9) technology, which allows targeted editing of the genome. The use of this technique allows to solve the treatment of such pathologies as: oncological diseases, sickle cell anemia, β-thalassemia, amyloidosis, nanotechnology, Duchenne muscular dystrophy, Parkinson's disease caused by genetic causes, digenic and monogenic hearing loss, etc. At this stage of the development of this technology, it is not available for the treatment of genetic and oncological diseases in general medicine. Clinical trials, development of application strategies and prevention of side effects in treatment using molecular scissors are being conducted. The question of the safe use of CRISPR/Cas9 is related to the possibility of unwanted mutations in the genetic material, with the lack of full prediction of the consequences. Choosing the optimal way to deliver CRISPR/Cas9 to the target and developing and improving the technology to prevent the occurrence of unwanted indels are no less urgent issues. The prospects of using these technologies give hope for reducing the mortality and disability of patients with pathologies that are currently difficult to treat or are incurable. Taking into account the percentage of efficiency, the use of CRISPR/Cas9 technology, in contrast to ZFN (Zinc-Finger Nucleases) or TALEN (Transcription Activator-Like Effector Nucleases), is more optimal.

References

Zhang, Song, et al. "Strategies in the delivery of Cas9 ribonucleoprotein for CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing." Theranostics 11.2 (2021): 614.

Duan, Li, et al. "Nanoparticle delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 for genome editing." Frontiers in Genetics 12 (2021): 673286.

Wang, Si-Wei, et al. "Current applications and future perspective of CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing in cancer." Molecular Cancer 21.1 (2022): 1-27.

Konstantakos, Vasileios, et al. "CRISPR–Cas9 gRNA efficiency prediction: an overview of predictive tools and the role of deep learning." Nucleic Acids Research 50.7 (2022): 3616-3637.

Dimitri, Alexander, Friederike Herbst, and Joseph A. Fraietta. "Engineering the next-generation of CAR T-cells with CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing." Molecular Cancer 21.1 (2022): 78.

Xu, Xiaoyu, et al. "Nanotechnology-based delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 for cancer treatment." Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews 176 (2021): 113891

Selvakumar, Sushmaa Chandralekha, et al. "CRISPR/Cas9 and next generation sequencing in the personalized treatment of Cancer." Molecular Cancer 21.1 (2022): 83.

Chang N. et al. Genome editing with RNA-guided Cas9 nuclease in zebrafish embryos //Cell research. 2013. Т. 23. №. 4. С. 465–472.

Höijer, Ida, et al. "CRISPR-Cas9 induces large structural variants at on-target and off-target sites in vivo that segregate across generations." Nature Communications 13.1 (2022): 627.

Zou, Yan, et al. "Blood-brain barrier–penetrating single CRISPR-Cas9 nanocapsules for effective and safe glioblastoma gene therapy." Science advances 8.16 (2022): eabm8011.

Bhattacharjee, Gargi, et al. "Current approaches in CRISPR-Cas9 mediated gene editing for biomedical and therapeutic applications." Journal of Controlled Release, 2022.

Dong, Chen, et al. "A genome-wide CRISPR-Cas9 knockout screen identifies essential and growth-restricting genes in human trophoblast stem cells." Nature communications 13.1 (2022): 2548

Gillmore, Julian D., et al. "CRISPR-Cas9 in vivo gene editing for transthyretin amyloidosis." New England Journal of Medicine 385.6 (2021): 493-502

Frangoul, Haydar, et al. "CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing for sickle cell disease and β-thalassemia." New England Journal of Medicine 384.3 (2021): 252-260.

Fu, Bin, et al. "CRISPR–Cas9-mediated gene editing of the BCL11A enhancer for pediatric β0/β0 transfusion-dependent β-thalassemia." Nature Medicine 28.8 (2022): 1573-1580.

Mansour, Heba M., and Aiman S. El-Khatib. "Exploring Parkinson-associated kinases for CRISPR/Cas9-based gene editing: beyond alpha-synuclein." Ageing Research Reviews (2023): 102114

Tao, Yong, et al. "Treatment of monogenic and digenic dominant genetic hearing loss by CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoprotein delivery in vivo." Nature Communications 14.1 (2023): 4928.

Agrawal, Pooja, et al. "Role of CRISPR/Cas9 in the treatment of Duchenne muscular dystrophy and its delivery strategies." Life Sciences (2023): 122003.

Published

2023-10-18

How to Cite

КЛИМЕНКО, І., & ГАЛАДЗА, М. (2023). GENOME EDITING: CLUSTERED REGULARLY INTERSPACED SHORT PALINDROMIC REPEAT (CRISPR/CAS9). Modern Medicine, Pharmacy and Psychological Health, (3(12), 11-17. https://doi.org/10.32689/2663-0672-2023-3-2

Most read articles by the same author(s)