INJURY – ASPECTS OF THE SCENARIO OF THE PROCEDURE IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32689/2617-9660-2018-2-2-50-66Keywords:
Lost profit, hypothetical lost profits, abstract lost profit, Non-material injury.Abstract
The aspects of the scenario are based on practical causes In the Czech Republic, but some were even established in the Slovak Republic, but they certainly have a practical application in other countries as well. In comparison with the loss of profit, direct damage and the time of the whole cases, the non-equity satisfaction expressed in money should be author's a qualified estimate of around 0,25 %, from damages for each year that the tortfeasor caused the harm. The article is an introduction to study of the procedure for determining lost profits and hypothetical lost profit, a non-material injury, in the case of the tortfeasor caused the harm for longer period of time. The article deals this matter from the perspective of Czech and partly Slovak law. The practical methods of calculation will be shown in the next article, which will most probably follow right after this one for readers and all interested in this issue in Ukraine. This article is also the result and summary of the author's previous academic work on the subject. In the search of interference points of the injury to the other terms like damage, hypothetical abstract lost profit or a non-material injury, we cannot help to make a certain analogy that brings us to the virtual world. Thomas Kuhn called this paradigm, in the context of analysing and explaining the changes in the various scientific disciplines, changes in the basic cognitive assumptions with which a scientist, researcher, observer or experimenter works. In the general concept, any damage which does not imply a direct loss of property for the injured party may be regarded as non-material damage in the legal point of view. This is typically a harm to the health, honour or the privacy of the person. When expressed in money this damage is quantified and determined. Non-material injury would require far greater analysis in view of the above-mentioned aspects.
References
Tondl L. Věda, technika a společnost: soudobé tendence a transformace vzájemných vazeb. Praha : Filosofia, 1994. 182 s.
Nedbálek Karel. Újma, škoda v ČR a SR, Praktický nástin výpočtu. [monografie] Slušovice: Miroslav Tomšů — Nakladatelství Monument, 2018.
Law of the Czech Republic № 90/2012 Coll., about trading companies and cooperatives (Law on commercial corporations).
Law of the Czech Republic № 89/2012 Coll., Civil code.
Finding of the Constitutional Court of the Czech Republic Sp. Zn. I. TC 1310/09, of 5 May 2001 8th 2009.
Schelle K., Židlická M. et al., Právní dějiny. Praha: Eurolex Bohemia, 2005, 816 s.
Bible: Písmo svaté Starého a Nového zákona: 2. kniha Mojžíšova Exodus [21: 37]. 2009. Česká biblická společnost, s. 1237.
Kavěna M. Exemplární náhrada škody v angloamerických a kontinentálních právních řádech. Praha : Parlamentní institut, Studie Č. 5. 268, Parlament České republiky, 2007. 18 s.
“Gaius“, Kincl, J. U čebnice práva o čtyřech knihách (Institutiones). Brno: Doplněk, 1993, s. 274.
Hobbes T. Leviathan aneb látka, forma a moc státu církevního a politického. Oikoymenh, 2009, s. 513.
Nordhaus W. D., Samuelson P. A. Ekonomie. Praha: Svoboda, 1991, s. 737.
Večeřa M., Urbanová M. Sociologie práva. Plzeň: Vydavatelství a nakladatelství Aleš Čeněk, 2006, s. 336.
Smidak E. F. Žaluji životní prostředí a Smidakovy principy: Moc a odpovědnost akce a reakce. Brno: CENTA; Luzern: Nadace Avenira, 1996, s. 139.
Jonas H. Princip odpovědnosti: Pokus o etiku pro technologickou civilizaci. [Das Prinzip Verantwortung: Versuch einer Ethik für die technologische Zivilisation]. Praha: Oikoymenh, 1997, (c1979), 320 s.
Bejček J. Poznámka ke vztahu ušlého zisku a tzv. zmařené příležitosti. In Obchodní právo. Praha: Prospektrum, 2005, č. 4.
Bezouška P. Co je to škoda a co je to újma, PRK Partners [online]. [cit. 2014-11-18]. Available on the internet: <http://www.prkpartners.cz/rekodifikace/ legislativni-novinky/395-co- -je-to-skoda-a-co-je-to-ujma/>
Judgment of the Supreme Court of the Czech Republic Sp. Zn. 25 Cdo 224/2010, of 30 May 1999. March 2011.
Law of the Czech Republic № 40/2009 Coll., Criminal Code.
Constitutional Court finding Czech Republic sp. zn. I. TC 643/04 of 6 July 2003 9th 2005.
Judgment of the Supreme Court of the Czech Republic Sp. Zn. 30th Cdo 3170/2009, of 27 May 2001. January 2011.
Finding of the Constitutional Court of the Czech Republic, Sp. Zn. III. TC 124/03, of 11 May 2001 12.2003.
Finding of the Constitutional Court of the Czech Republic, Sp. Zn. II. TC 321/98, of 5 May 2001 5.1999.
Law of the Czech Republic № 513/1991 Coll., Commercial Code, repealed.
Judgment of the Supreme Court Czech Republic 25Cdo1920/99 of 28 March 2002 November 2001.
Nedbálek K. Abstraktní ušlý zisk při škodě v daňovém řízení. In Obchodní právo. č. 1/2010, Praha: 2010.
Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the case of complaint no 77575/01, Farange S. A. Against France, § 49, of 13 December 2001 7.2006.
Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights In case of complaint no 60682/00, Young Against the United Kingdom, § 48, of 16 July 2002. 1.2007.
Nedbálek K. V ýpočet abstraktního ušlého zisku z rentability při škodě v daňovém řízení. In Právník: Teoretický časopis pro otázky státu a práva. č 3/ 2011, str. 294. Praha: Ústav státu a práva AV ČR, 2011.
Brejcha A. Odpovědnost v soukromém a veřejném právu. Praha : Codex Bohemia, 2000.
Law of the Czech Republic № 40/1964 Coll., Civil Code, out of effect.