ON THE SUBJECT OF INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL MEDIATION: CURRENT STATUS AND PROSPECTS FOR DEVELOPMENT

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32689/2617-9660-2026-1(37)-6-13

Keywords:

international commercial mediation, alternative dispute resolution (ADR), the regulatory framework for mediation, comparative legal analysis, the institutional infrastructure of mediation, facilitative, evaluative and transformative models of mediation, confidentiality and procedural privilege

Abstract

This article examines the current state and trends in the development of international commercial mediation as a component of a multi-tiered dispute resolution system. It argues that mediation is evolving from an alternative conflict resolution tool into an independent element of the global justice system, focused on achieving legally binding and potentially enforceable outcomes. The evolution of the regulatory framework for mediation is analysed, in particular, the role of model acts, international treaty mechanisms and national legislation, and the significance of the Singapore Convention in shaping the mechanism for the cross-border enforcement of mediation agreements is outlined. A comparative legal analysis is conducted of approaches to the institutionalisation of mediation in various jurisdictions, including Ukraine, the United Kingdom, the United States and Singapore, with an emphasis on the role of institutional infrastructure and procedural integration. Particular attention is paid to the activities of leading international institutions and their influence on the development of mediation practice as a market mechanism. The article examines the characteristics of procedural models of mediation, including facilitative, evaluative and transformative models, as well as hybrid forms combining mediation with arbitration. The article also analyses issues relating to the enforcement of mediation agreements, confidentiality and procedural privilege, the role of lawyers in the mediation process, and the importance of professional standards. It is argued that the effectiveness of international commercial mediation is determined by the integration of regulatory, institutional, procedural and economic factors. It concludes that there is a need for further development of the institutional environment for mediation in Ukraine, taking into account international experience. It is emphasised separately that the further development of international commercial mediation depends not only on improving the regulatory framework, but also on establishing a consistent practice of its application. In this context, particular importance is attached to the institutional capacity of mediation centres, the transparency of statistical data, the standardisation of procedures, the proper professional training of mediators and representatives of the parties, as well as the ability of national legal systems to ensure the predictability and enforceability of the agreements reached.

References

Baril, M., & Dickey, D. (2009). MED-ARB: The best of both worlds or just a limited ADR option? Mediate.com. https://www2.mediate.com/pdf/V2%20MED-ARB%20The%20Best%20of%20Both%20Worlds%20or%20Just%20a%20Limited%20ADR%20Option.pdf

Brown, C. (2002). Facilitative mediation: The classic approach retains its appeal. Mediate.com. https://mediate.com/facilitative-mediation-the-classic-approach-retains-its-appeal/

Ministry of Justice. (n.d.). Civil Procedure Rules. Justice UK. https://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/civil/rules

European Parliament & Council of the European Union. (2008). Directive 2008/52/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 May 2008 on certain aspects of mediation in civil and commercial matters. EUR-Lex. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32008L0052

Singapore International Mediation Centre. (n.d.). Lit-Med-Lit. https://simc.com.sg/lit-med-lit

Singapore Statutes Online. (2021). Mediation Act 2017. https://sso.agc.gov.sg/Act/MA2017

American Arbitration Association. (n.d.). Mediation services. https://www.adr.org/mediation/

International Chamber of Commerce. (n.d.). Mediation. https://iccwbo.org/dispute-resolution/dispute-resolution-services/adr/mediation/

International Mediation Institute. (n.d.). Model mediation rules and clauses. https://imimediation.org/resources/rules-and-clauses/

Cornell Law School. (n.d.). Rule 408. Compromise offers and negotiations. Legal Information Institute. https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/rule_408

Singapore International Arbitration Centre. (2024). SIAC-SIMC Arb-Med-Arb model clause (“Arb-Med-Arb Clause”). https://siac.org.sg/siac-simc-arb-med-arb-model-clause

United Nations Commission on International Trade Law. (n.d.). Status: United Nations Convention on International Settlement Agreements Resulting from Mediation. United Nations. https://uncitral.un.org/en/texts/mediation/conventions/international_settlement_agreements/status

United Nations Commission on International Trade Law. (2016). Technical notes on online dispute resolution. https://uncitral.un.org/en/texts/onlinedispute/explanatorytexts/technical_notes

Centre for Effective Dispute Resolution. (2025). The eleventh CEDR mediation audit. https://www.cedr.com/hubfs/CEDR%20Mediation%20Audit%202025.pdf

United Nations Commission on International Trade Law. (2002). UNCITRAL model law on international commercial conciliation with guide to enactment and use. United Nations. https://uncitral.un.org/sites/default/files/media-documents/uncitral/en/03-90953_ebook.pdf

Mediate.com. (2001). Uniform Mediation Act. https://mediate.com/uniform-mediation-act/

United Nations. (2019). United Nations Convention on International Settlement Agreements Resulting from Mediation. https://uncitral.un.org/sites/default/files/media-documents/EN/Texts/UNCITRAL/Arbitration/mediation_convention_v1900316_eng.pdf

World Intellectual Property Organization. (n.d.). WIPO caseload summary. https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/center/caseload.html

Zumeta, Z. (2018). Styles of mediation: Facilitative, evaluative, and transformative mediation. Mediate.com.https://mediate.com/styles-of-mediation-facilitative-evaluative-and-transformative-mediation/

United Nations. (1958). Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards. https://icac.org.ua/wp-content/uploads/Text-of-UN-Convention_New-York-1958-4.pdf

Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. (2021). Law of Ukraine No. 1875-IX “On Mediation”. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1875-20#Text

Published

2026-06-09

How to Cite

Барановська, В. М. (2026). ON THE SUBJECT OF INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL MEDIATION: CURRENT STATUS AND PROSPECTS FOR DEVELOPMENT. Expert: Paradigm of Law and Public Administration, (1(37), 6-13. https://doi.org/10.32689/2617-9660-2026-1(37)-6-13

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Obs.: This plugin requires at least one statistics/report plugin to be enabled. If your statistics plugins provide more than one metric then please also select a main metric on the admin's site settings page and/or on the journal manager's settings pages.