ANTI-CORRUPTION POLICY IN THE SYSTEM OF EU INTERNAL MARKET LAW: CONCEPTUAL BASIS

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32689/2617-9660-2026-1(37)-51-57

Keywords:

EU anti-corruption policy, EU internal market, regulatory arbitrage, EU Anti-Corruption Directive

Abstract

The article provides a comprehensive doctrinal and practical analysis of the conceptual foundations for integrating anti-corruption policy into the architecture of the European Union internal market law. The relevance of the study stems from the premise that the fragmentation of national anti-corruption legislation creates fertile ground for regulatory arbitrage and systematically distorts the competitive environment for cross-border business. The primary objective of this research is to define the role of anti-corruption standards not merely as democratic values, but as a strict, instrumental prerequisite for the successful functioning of the single European space. The research demonstrates that the absence of unified legal definitions regarding private sector corruption generates regulatory gaps that result in substantial financial losses for the European economy, estimated between 179 and 990 billion euros annually. Furthermore, the paper thoroughly examines the complex jurisdictional nature of EU anti-corruption norms through the lens of Union competence, the PIF-directive, and the resolution of legal basis collisions defined by Articles 83 and 325 of the TFEU. The practical implementation of these conceptual approaches is analyzed using the precedent of the new comprehensive EU Directive on combating corruption, adopted in 2026. The article details the Directive’s core innovations: the unification of offense definitions, the introduction of severe corporate sanctions including fines of up to 5% of a company’s global turnover, and the liability standard for the failure to prevent a crime. The study concludes that the regulatory vector shifts towards preventative compliance. For Ukraine, as a candidate state, these transformations dictate the mandatory direction for further legislative adaptation to access the EU internal market.

References

European Union. (2024b). Citizens' attitudes towards corruption in the EU in 2024 (Special Eurobarometer 548). https://europa.eu/eurobarometer/surveys/detail/3217

European Union. (2024a). Businesses’ attitudes towards corruption in the EU in 2024 (Flash Eurobarometer 543). https://europa.eu/eurobarometer/surveys/detail/3180

Hafner, M., Taylor, J., Disley, E., Thebes, S., Barberi, M., & Stepanek, M. (2016). The cost of non-Europe in the area of corruption. Annex II – Corruption in the EU: In-depth analysis. European Parliamentary Research Service. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/IDAN/2016/558779/EPRS_IDA(2016)558779(ANN2)_EN.pdf

Mungiu-Pippidi, A. (2015). The quest for good governance: How societies develop control of corruption. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316286937

Rose-Ackerman, S., & Palifka, B. J. (2016). Corruption and government: Causes, consequences, and reform (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139962933

Directive (EU) 2017/1371 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 July 2017 on the fight against fraud to the Union’s financial interests by means of criminal law. (2017). Official Journal of the European Union, L 198, 29–41. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2017/1371/oj/eng

Mitsilegas, V. (2022). EU criminal law (2nd ed.). Hart Publishing.

Szarek-Mason, P. (2010). The European Union’s fight against corruption: The evolving policy towards member states and candidate countries. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511676086

Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on combating corruption, replacing Council Framework Decision 2003/568/JHA and the Convention on the fight against corruption involving officials of the European Communities or officials of Member States of the European Union and amending Directive (EU) 2017/1371 of the European Parliament and of the Council (COM/2023/234 final). (2023). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=COM%3A2023%3A234%3AFIN

Directive (EU) 2026/1021 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2026 on combatting corruption, replacing Council Framework Decision 2003/568/JHA and the Convention on the fight against corruption involving officials of the European Communities or officials of Member States of the European Union and amending Directive (EU) 2017/1371 of the European Parliament and of the Council. (2026). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2026/1021/oj

Asp, P. (2012). The substantive criminal law competence of the EU. Jure Förlag.

Ligeti, K., & Simonato, M. (2013). The European Public Prosecutor’s Office: Towards a truly European prosecution service. In Toward a prosecutor for the European Union (Vol. 1, pp. 1–15). Hart Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1177/203228441300400102

Zimmermann, F. (2024). Just call it corruption and criminalise... An assessment of the Commission’s proposal for an EU Directive on combating corruption (COM [2023] 234 final). European Criminal Law Review, 14(1), pp. 27-48. https://doi.org/10.5771/2193-5505-2024-1-27

Bellingeri, M., & Luppi, F. (2023). Combating corruption in EU legislation. Eucrim, 18(3), 281–286. https://doi.org/10.30709/eucrim-2023-025

Monnery, B., & Chirat, A. (2024). Trust in a national anti-corruption agency: A survey experiment among citizens and experts. European Journal of Political Economy, 85, Article 102592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2024.102592

Krivins, A., Durguti, E., Vilks, A., & Kipane, A. (2025). Ethics and corruption in the European Union: A content analysis. European Review, 33(5), 555–580. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1062798725100240

Published

2026-06-09

How to Cite

Плескач, А. В. (2026). ANTI-CORRUPTION POLICY IN THE SYSTEM OF EU INTERNAL MARKET LAW: CONCEPTUAL BASIS. Expert: Paradigm of Law and Public Administration, (1(37), 51-57. https://doi.org/10.32689/2617-9660-2026-1(37)-51-57

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Obs.: This plugin requires at least one statistics/report plugin to be enabled. If your statistics plugins provide more than one metric then please also select a main metric on the admin's site settings page and/or on the journal manager's settings pages.