THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PSYCHOLOGICAL RESILIENCE AND INDICATORS OF PERSONAL DEVELOPMENT

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32689/maup.psych.2023.5.1

Keywords:

resilience, psychological stability, personality traits, coping strategies, mental health, psychological well-being, war, military conflict, military personnel

Abstract

The study of strategies for overcoming difficult life situations is an important part of the issues related to stress coping or coping behaviour. It is quite relevant to analyse the relationship between psychological resilience of an individual and personal traits and coping strategies as determinants of mental well-being and health. The essence of the phenomenon of resistance as the ability to overcome the adverse effects of risks and traumatic events is analysed. Theoretical models explaining this phenomenon are considered. It is noted that these models explain the mechanism of resilience through the ability of protective factors to change the trajectory from risk exposure to negative outcomes. It is emphasised that resilience is not limited to recovery from difficult life situations, but also includes overcoming the difficulties themselves. It is stated that there is a connection between basic personality characteristics (extraversion, conscientiousness, benevolence, neuroticism, openness to experience) and psychological resilience. These characteristics can be used to explain, predict, and generalise individual behaviour. Traits such as openness, extraversion, and agreeableness are hypothesised to be "resilience-conducting" traits and predict adaptive responses to stress. personality characteristics explain about one-seventh of the variation in coping strategies, and the underlying coping and personality axes are interrelated. The main components of resilience are higher levels of self-control, achievement motivation, positive emotions, social activity and emotional stability. It is emphasised that the coping strategies chosen by a person are closely related to his or her personal characteristics. The choice of strategy will depend on a person's perception of a stressful situation. The factors underlying the choice of certain coping strategies are allocated: problem-oriented; emotionoriented; social-oriented; avoidance. It is concluded that the stress resistance of an individual is an indicator of mental health and may potentially indicate an improvement in the mental and physical condition of a person.

References

American Psychological Association, In APA dictionary of psychology. 2018. URL: https://dictionary.apa.org/coping.

Bonanno G. A., Romero S. A., Klein S. I. The temporal elements of psychological resilience: An integrative framework for the study of individuals, families, and communities. Psychological Inquiry. 2015. 26(2). Р.13 –169.

Cunningham M., Francois S., Rodriguez G., Lee X. W. Resilience and coping: An example in African American adolescents. Research in Human Development. 2018. 15(3–4). Р. 317–331.

Gárriz M., Gutiérrez F., Peri J. M., Baillés E., Torrubia R. Coping strategies within a personality space. Personality and Individual Differences. 2015. 80. Р. 96–100.

Hu T., Zhang D., & Wang J. A meta-analysis of the trait resilience and mental health. Personality and Individual Differences. 2015. 76. Р. 18–27.

Hutnik N., Smith P., Koch T. Using cognitive behaviour therapy to explore resilience in the life‐stories of 16 UK centenarians. Nursing open. 2016. 3(2). Р. 110–118.

Kalisch R., Müller M. B., Tüscher O. A conceptual framework for the neurobiological study of resilience. Behavioral and brain sciences. 2015. 38.

Litman J. A. The COPE inventory: Dimensionality and relationships with approach-and avoidancemotives and positive and negative traits. Personality and Individual differences. 2006. 41(2). Р. 273–284.

Lü W., Wang Z., Liu Y., Zhang H. Resilience as a mediator between extraversion, neuroticism and happiness, PA and NA. Personality and Individual Differences. 2014. 63. Р. 128–133.

McCrae R. R., Costa P. T., Jr. Toward a new generation of personality theories: Theoretical contexts for the five-factor model. In J. S. Wiggins (Ed.), The five-factor model of personality: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 51–87). New York: Guilford. 1996.

Oshio A., Taku K., Hirano M., Saeed, G. Resilience and Big Five personality traits: A meta-analysis. Personality and Individual Differences. 2018. 127. Р. 54–60.

Padesky C. A., Mooney K. A. Strengths‐based cognitive–behavioural therapy: A four‐step model to build resilience. Clinical psychology & psychotherapy. 2012. 19(4). Р. 283–290.

Rettger M. B. Finding the silver lining: How positive psychology can help you use critical feedback to flourish. 2018.

Semenets-Orlova, I., Mykhailych, O., Klochko, A., Nestulya, S., & Omelyanenko, V. (2019). Readiness of the education manager to provide the organizational development of institutions (based on the sociological research). Problems and Perspectives in Management, 17(3), 132-142.

Semenets-Orlova, I. A. (2018). Derzhavne upravlinnia osvitnimy zminamy v Ukraini: teoretychni zasady [Public Management of Educational Change in Ukraine: Theoretical Principles]. Kyiv: YuSPTON.

Ungar M. Practitioner review: diagnosing childhood resilience–a systemic approach to the diagnosis of adaptation in adverse social and physical ecologies. Journal of child psychology and psychiatry. 2015. 56(1). Р. 4–17.

van der Werff S. J., van den Berg S. M., Pannekoek J. N., Elzinga B. M., Van Der Wee N. J. Neuroimaging resilience to stress: a review. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience. 2013. 7. Р. 39.

Wang J. L., Zhang D. J., Zimmerman M. A. Resilience theory and its implications for Chinese adolescents. Psychological Reports. 2015. 117(2). Р. 354–375.

Wiley R. «Who Am I Now?»: Distress and Growth After Trauma (Doctoral dissertation, Arizona StateUniversity). 2013.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-30

How to Cite

ДРУЗЬ, О., РОДЧЕНКО, Л., РУДЕНКО, Л., СЕМЕНЕЦЬ-ОРЛОВА, І., & ВЕЛЬГАН, О. (2023). THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PSYCHOLOGICAL RESILIENCE AND INDICATORS OF PERSONAL DEVELOPMENT. Scientific Works of Interregional Academy of Personnel Management. Psychology, (5(61), 5-11. https://doi.org/10.32689/maup.psych.2023.5.1

Most read articles by the same author(s)