THE INFLUENCE OF ARCHETYPES ON SOCIAL TRANSFORMATIONS
Keywords:
archetypes, archetype-institutional mechanism, social transformations, socio-economic relationsAbstract
The vision of social transformations, which is a component of the stage of modernization of society, is presented. It is proposed to consider the influence of archetypes on social transformations through the formation of an archetypical and institutional mechanism for regulating socio-economic relations, which is proposed to be considered as an ordered set of institutional levers, incentives and measures aimed at ensuring the effective use of archetypes on the basis of a combination of factors of the micro- and macroeconomic environment by means of public administration. The emphasis is placed on the strengthening of the role of state and supra-national regulatory archetypical-institutional entities in the design of social transformations. Based on the existing theoretical and conceptual provisions for determining the content of the process of institutionalization of archetypes, it has been determined that the mechanism of regulation of institutional transformations of the national market should be considered in three main aspects, corresponding to the economic and social nature of the inter-subjective interaction of market participants. It is noted that the system-reflexive paradigm of regulation of the development and management of transformational changes of complex open socio-economic systems is based on the definition of the active nature of the influence of archetypes, subjects, as well as the reflexive procedures of their interaction, both on the choice of directions and ways of implementation, and on the dynamics of the flow of these processes. The composition of the main provisions that determine the feasibility of using a system of reflexive paradigm in the field of regulation of socio-economic relations, includes a set of assumptions. The main provisions defining the expediency of using the system-reflexive paradigm in the sphere of regulation of socio-economic relations are determined. It is established that the main institutional conflicts are manifestations of inconsistency between archetypes and elements of institutional environment.
References
Bromley D. W. Economic Interests and Institutions: The Conceptual Foundations of Public Policy / D. W. Bromley. — New York ; Oxford : Basil Blackwell, 1989. — 274 р.
Buchanan J. M. Economics from the Outside // “Better than Plowing” and Beyond / J. M. Buchanan. — Texas : Texas A&M University Press; Texas A&M University Economics Series, 2007. — 254 р.
Commons J. R. Institutional Economics: Its Place in Political Economy. Vol. I. / J. R. Commons. — Б/м : Transaction Publishers, 1990. — 648 р.
Davis L. Institutional Change and American Economic Growth / L. Davis, D. North. — Cambrige, 1971. — P. 5–6.
Gavkalova N. The paradigm of the state regulatory policy / N. Gavkalova, K. Wackowski // Економіка розвит- ку. — Харків : ХНЕУ ім. С. Кузнеця, 2016. — № 2. — С. 40–44.
Hanisch M. Institutional analysis and institutional change: What to learn from the case of bulgarian land reform? / M. Hanisch, A. Schlüter // Land Ownership, Land Markets and their Inuence on the Efficiency of Agricultural Production in Central and Eastern Europe / P. Tillack and E. Schulze (eds) ; Vauk ; Kiel, 2000. — Р. 152–170.
MacLeod G. Globalizing Parisian thought-waves: recent advances in the study of social regulation, politics, discourse and space / G. MacLeod // Progress in Human Geography. — 1997. — № 4 : Vol. 21. — Р. 530–553.
Mainwaring S. Party system institutionalization and party system theory after the third wave of democratization / S. Mainwaring, M. Torcal // Handbook of Party Politics / R. S. Katz and W.Crotty (eds). — London : Thousand Oaks ; CA and New Delhi : Sage, 2006. — Р. 204–227.
Ostrom E. Understanding Institutional Diversity / Е. Ostrom. — Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2005. — 376 р.
Rodrik D. Goodbye Washington Consensus, Hello Washington Confusion? / D. Rodrik // Journal of Economic Literature. — 2006. — № 44 (December). — Р. 973–987.
Savchuk N. Institutional budget architectonics in the structure of budget system of Ukraine / N. Savchuk // The New economy. Scientific Journal. — Bratislava. — 2014. — № 1 : vol. 7. — Р. 109–116.
Schotter A. The economic theory of social institutions / A. Schotter. — Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 1981. — 192 р.
Simon H. Rationality in Psychology and Economics / H. A. Simon // The Journal of Business. — 1986. — № 4 : Vol. 59 : Part 2: The Behavioral Foundations of Economic Theory. — Р. 209– 224.
Stiglitz J. E. The economic role of the state / J. E. Stiglitz. — Б/м : Blackwell Pub, 1989. — 128 р.
The Global Competitiveness Report 2016–2017 [Електронний ресурс]. — Режим доступу: https://www.weforum.org/reports/the-global-competitiveness-report-2016-2017-1
The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development. — 2007. — 92 p.
Tversky A. Advances in prospect theory: cumulative representation of uncertainty / A. Tversky, D. Kahneman // Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. — 1992. — № 5. — Р. 297–232.
Understanding the Process of Economic Change / D. C. North. — Princeton, NJ : Princeton University Press ; The Princeton Economic History of the Western World, 2010. — 200 р.
