PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF LEADERSHIP IN MILITARY UNITS: STATE MANAGEMENT AS A FACTOR IN FORMING EFFECTIVE LEADERSHIP

Abstract

Abstract. The purpose of the article is to analyze the factors that contribute to the formation of effective leadership in military units and to develop recommendations for optimizing management decisions in this area. Methodology. Obtaining results is based on the fundamental principles of public administration science, psychology. The methodological tools of using both general scientific methods of cognition and special ones. The study used such research methods as dialectical, systematization method, analysis and synthesis method, generalization method. Scientific news. Leadership in military units is critically successful for the successful completion of combat missions and ensuring the overall effectiveness of the armed forces. Particularly vulnerable to the development of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) are individuals who have sometimes noted the impact of traumatic events or witnessed them. In the context of the current conflict, military personnel represent one of the most vulnerable groups of the population. Constant exposure to life-threatening situations, participation in combat, and exposure to extreme conditions significantly increase the risk of developing PTSD in this cohort. Conclusions. Modern challenges, such as the complexity and multidimensionality of military operations, highlight the significance of the psychological aspects of leadership. Military leaders are expected to not only possess professional competence but also make quick, informed decisions in uncertain conditions, motivate subordinates, and maintain their morale in critical situations. Effective leadership in military units involves consideration of psychological factors such as motivation, fears, emotional states, and stress responses. This ensures the combat readiness of units and promotes cohesion and effective interaction among servicemen. State management plays a crucial role in shaping effective military leadership through regulatory support, creating conditions for the professional development of military personnel, and providing access to modern knowledge in military psychology. The article offers recommendations for optimizing management decisions through the integration of innovative training methods such as case technologies, emotional intelligence, and stress resilience training, as well as consideration of individual servicemen’s characteristics. The adaptation of military leadership doctrine to new conditions, particularly in the context of hybrid threats, is essential. The conclusions emphasize the need to modernize approaches to military leadership with a focus on flexibility, individualization, and the integration of advanced psychological methods. This will enhance leadership effectiveness in military units and address contemporary challenges.